Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajni KC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:01, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rajni KC

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Alternate speling of "Rajani KC": Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NPOLITICIAN says that unelected candidates are not inherently notable, nor does her educational position make her notable. Also fails WP:GNG. —C.Fred (talk) 13:21, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —C.Fred (talk) 13:21, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. —C.Fred (talk) 13:21, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Nothing but routine coverage on the recent candidacy, it's not even a major party. Nothing suggesting the subject yet meets GNG, NPROF or NPOL, in english or Nepali sources. Quite certainly a PR campaign aimed at the election (created by a COI editor). Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 16:11, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they did not win, but this makes no other strong claim that she has any preexisting notability for other reasons: neither being deputy administrator of a university, nor being on her political party's organizing committee, are instant notability freebies that would exempt a person from having to have a lot more reliable source media coverage than just a couple of short blurbs verifying and reverifying and rereverifying her unsuccessful candidacy. Bearcat (talk) 18:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bearcat, unsuccessful-- the candidacy is for a new election, a seat made vacant prematurely, not that it makes a difference to the point. Cheers! Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 18:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment She was "deputy administrator" of Pokhara University. That is a title to sounds to me like it could be something quite high up in faculty (potentially indicating notbability), or it could be very minor. I don't know anything about how Nepali universities are organized, but it seems like something worth looking into. LadyofShalott 15:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
LadyofShalott, it looks like she was a deputy administrator at the Uni. This list is probably of the ones that have NPROF claims, while this list looks like the kind she might have belonged to. I am quite certain the position doesn't accord her inherent notability. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 13:25, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. --SalmanZ (talk) 16:09, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.