Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock-Ola
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep because I, the nominator, withdraw my nomination and there are no delete votes.
--דניאל ~ Danielrocks123 talk contribs Count 22:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non notable. Was deprodded by the author. --דניאל ~ Danielrocks123 talk contribs Count 00:15, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Yes. [1] < Isn't a hoax after all. ResurgamII 01:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A historic and well-known brand of jukebox. Over 300,000 google hits. Irongargoyle 01:44, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. Not a hoax, as google and lexis show (search for "rock-ola jukebox"). Seems to be on the tongues of old folks nostalgiac for the good ol' days (no offense, I may or may not be an old folk myself). Don't know if it belongs on WP or not, but wd guess so, unfortunately. Pan Dan 01:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Remember this is a stub. Hopefully somebody will expand it with a short history of the Rock-Ola company. Greensburger 02:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand. Buckner 1986 05:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This stub is woefully incomplete, but the subject matter is notable. The brand is highly regarded among music fans, and Google gives ~773,000 hits on "Rock-Ola". Lazybum 06:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, clearly notable, and with references. -- Whpq 10:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand per above; important bit of Americana. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- very famous, I'm quite surprised there isn't a more extensive article already. Pinball22 15:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keeparticle just needs to be expanded. Ramsquire 18:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: apart from Wurlitzer probably the only jukebox company I've ever heard of, and I'm normally not interested in those things... Has its own collectors[2], [3]. Apparently, they made more than 400,000 jukeboxes (so definitely not a small company)[4]. Enough info, Google hits, and notability to warrant inclusion as a well-known brand of a long gone era (to me at least :-) ) Fram 19:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep requires improvement. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 20:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Historically significant and notable. --Pinkkeith 21:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.