Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocker Vybz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rocker Vybz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP: NMUSICIAN in that I can find no published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject and the article makes no claim of notability either. The AfC was declined for lack of notability but the article was published anyway. Two conflict of interest, single purpose editors seem to be involved. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:41, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:41, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:41, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As per nominator, AfC declined, and the editors involved in creating the account are single-purpose accounts (at least one likely the musician himself, judging by the name). Greenman (talk) 14:17, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Highly searchable name, but I too could find nothing WP:RS. Narky Blert (talk) 12:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find anything that suggests the guidelines for inclusion set out at WP:MUSICBIO are met. Agree that this looks like self-promotion by a single purpose account with a WP:COI. — sparklism ^hey! 07:13, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.