Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Potts
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 00:13, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable, possible vanity. Mtiedemann 00:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
sounds very un notable please delete it--Cr0w bar 00:28, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete imagine we had an article on every single political party activist. Not notable enough, I'm afraid. Camillus (talk) 00:36, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn & vanity. Mikker ... 02:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete minor political functionary Ruby 02:55, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. --Terence Ong 03:39, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn/vanity. Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 03:43, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Richard F. 04:29, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vanity. Car salesman 14:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Vanity article, does not merit inclusion or meet WP:BIO. Thor Malmjursson 18:20, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete seems nn, but maybe this guy actually consulted for someone famous? The current article doesn't mention any such work so I would delete. If kept, it needs serious cleanup in terms of spelling/grammar. --ʀ6ʍɑʏ89 18:20, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I am actually a member of the Liberal Democrat party, and I've never heard of him! Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 20:41, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Definetly vanity --† Ðy§ep§ion † Speak your mind 00:06, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn vanity. Blnguyen 03:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Ardenn 22:32, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.