Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TEKTON

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:18, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TEKTON

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references does not display the articles notabily. Plus that it looks like it is written a little bit like an ad. (t) Josve05a (c) 20:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence provided or found that this product line is notable. (Note that there are construction firms of similar names for which coverage can be found.) AllyD (talk) 07:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Although the brand may not be in many articles, it is one of the top selling brands in Amazon.com's Hand Tools department.[See here] The brand is also sold on Sears.com and Lowes.com. And it is an oft-mentioned brand in Garage Journal, which is a popular blog among tool users and mechanics. [See here]. I can understand if you still have to delete it because there aren't scholarly articles on the brand, but I believe it is a product line that is notable. Mjdeboer52 (talk) 19:51, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not because it isn't notable, but because this is an ad. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:24, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.