Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tara hinds
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete by WP:SNOW as failing the biography rules generally and the guidelines for biographies of living persons specifically. Bearian (talk) 18:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable choir director. Claims of notability. Corvus cornixtalk 21:36, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless it can be explained why these awards are significant.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 21:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No context in the article, much less evidence of notability. --Orlady (talk) 21:57, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, practically the first word is "accomplished" but as I frequently point out accomplishment is not notability, otherwise we'd be a directory of everyone who does their job well enough to not get fired. Also, "friends with renowned X Joe Blow" is one of those telltales of desperation. Fails WP:BIO. --Dhartung | Talk 23:32, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:12, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- comment After googling "Alexander Huseman", I deleted the sentence "Tara is great friends with world renound airport builder, scientist, muscian, musical artist, and athlete Alexander Huseman.". Call me bold... Pete.Hurd (talk) 06:38, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete googling "Tara hinds" "mount carmel" generates one lone blog hit. I'm not convinced this isn't a hoax, and I'd hate to have to falsify Geogre's_Law. Pete.Hurd (talk) 06:38, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:BIO. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 06:54, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If people hesitate whether this may be a hoax, then this clearly does not concern a notable person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crusio (talk • contribs) 10:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.