Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Cummings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 06:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Cummings

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable. His film and television roles are extremely minor. His stage work seems to consist of almost entirely non-notable productions with one or two understudy roles in notable productions. None of his writing seems to be notable. All of his awards seem to be minor awards that aren't enough to establish notability.

There have also been a lot of edits done to the article by IP addresses who seem to have a conflict of interest. One IP address admitted as much,[1] and the edit histories of 76.251.201.46 and 75.141.125.234 suggest they have a conflict as well. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 23:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 23:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 23:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Unless I'm being completely misled by what I'm finding online, the subject seems to have been in a lot of theatre productions, often playing lead roles, and is getting significant coverage in articles by Los Angeles Times, Variety and more. I believe he passes the notability requirements for actors. Dflaw4 (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He meets the creative artist criteria. Roles in notable productions, with significant reviews (e.g. LA Times). I agree media coverage is not the best, but he is a notable actor nonetheless. Best, PK650 (talk) 23:06, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Lots of roles. The Huffington Post and Broadway World articles are good quality. There's some CoI-style puff language, but per WP:ARTN, a poorly-written article (or CoI IP editors) doesn't make a notable subject less notable. -- Toughpigs (talk) 06:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The subject meets the WP:GNG. I understand the fact that there was one IP address involved with COI, but the subject is notable enough to be included in the Wikipedia. Angus1986 (talk) 11:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.