Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UniVerse
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 11:41, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is so happy about this piece of software I think it's an ad Ruby 02:38, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I have to agree with the above —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Acebrock (talk • contribs) 2006-02-09 18:40:34.
- Delete Definetly an ad --† Ðy§ep§ion † Speak your mind 02:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. And a lame-o ad at that. Grandmasterka 04:06, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as ads per nom.Blnguyen 05:44, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as advertising. JIP | Talk 09:02, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as ad. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 10:29, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not only is it an ad, it's pure marketspeak as well.--み使い Mitsukai 13:49, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as ad. --Andrew c 15:15, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 18:11, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, pure promo. Daniel Case 19:53, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete d Avi 18:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Dont Delete Shelvin 10:04, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Preceding comment actually by 210.55.69.40 (talk · contribs) at 21:05, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.