Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wellz Fargoe
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SPEEDY DELETE. Just to note that I had already deleted the article before Arxiloxos posted their comment. SpinningSpark 19:40, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Wellz Fargoe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not sure if this really deserves a page-he was accepted into these sports but never played the games. also a odd add on the top not sure why a sound cloud is there Wgolf (talk) 16:46, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Just noticed that oddly the name is different even in the article. Wgolf (talk) 18:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Borderline WP:CSD#A7 candidate. Nothing here that would support a finding of notability even if verifiable, and as best I can determine, it isn't verifiable either. --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:55, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as having no credible assertion of notability: notice that the user who created this (autobiog?) has had a page with the same content rejected several times as AfC: see User talk:Denfield21 and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Denfield baptiste. PamD 18:59, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- I think a speedy be good also, or just close this AFD now even be great. Wgolf (talk) 19:02, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- I'm OK with speedy here, but keeping in mind that CSD#A7 requires that there be no credible assertion of "importance or significance", not "notability", and the claim that he was in the NBA D-League might get over that lower barrier--but then there's only a vague assertion that he was on a "skills team", not an actual D-League roster, so even though playing in the D-League probably can get you past the A7 line, the assertions here don't make it. A WP:SNOW delete close of the AfD would be OK too, but I've read somewhere in the past that unless there's an urgency, one should wait at least 24 hours before snow-deleting an article, just to make sure all time zones have a chance to chime in. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:36, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- I think a speedy be good also, or just close this AFD now even be great. Wgolf (talk) 19:02, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.