Talk:1994 bond market crisis

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2021 and 8 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jvalle58. Peer reviewers: NatashaVij.

The article was featured in a WikiEdu article blog on February 17, 2022.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very impressed by Jvalle58's work. I created this stub in 2017, after reading about it in chapter 10 of More Money Than God: Hedge Funds and the Making of a New Elite. I didn't know much about it so watched it sit as a stub for a long time. A series of WP:SPA editors (or the same person) greatly expanded the article during 2020, but I ended up removing their work as it contained copyright violations, non-neutral opinionated wording, lacked sources and didn't appear to be reliable. Back to a stub! That's good because it freed up the space so that when User:Jvalle58 found it in 2021, he saw a blank slate opportunity. When I first saw WikiEd was staking a claim, I wasn't sure what would happen and was cautiously optimistic. I watched as Jvalle58 made one impressive edit at the next. Sometimes it takes the right person, right time, and this was it. Now we have a reliable history that should last for a long time. And a good blog article too! Nice work Jvalle58. -- GreenC 21:03, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]