Jump to content

Talk:Alibaba Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 July 2020 and 14 August 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Xwang2182.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2019 and 8 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dw2460.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

is there anything like this website ? are there other global market "hub" sites ? anything comparable to alibaba (even if on a smaller scale)

In Spanish speaking markets the word associated to "Alibaba" is not "Open Sesame" but the phrase "and the forty thieves" (Alí Baba... y los cuarenta ladrones". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.4.23.10 (talk) 15:54, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alibaba, Yahoo!, shark controversy

[edit]

Alibaba Group, China's biggest e-commerce firm, is no longer engaged in the business of allowing sellers of shark fins to list their products on its platforms. Alibaba Group banned the sale of shark fin on its platforms as of January 1, 2009.

Environmentalists, ocean lovers and a growing world-wide scuba diving community who were aware of the decision applauded Alibaba for the ban.

Yahoo! has a US$1 billion stake in Alibaba representing a 40% shareholding.

Activist groups, thousands of petitioning individuals from all over the world and media organizations had approached both Alibaba and Yahoo! to induce them to drop the shark fin trade. The conclusion of internationally renowned marine experts is that the indiscriminate mass killing of well over one hundred million sharks per year, mostly for their fins, is driving many species into extinction with catastrophic consequences for the biodiversity of the world's oceans.

[1]

78.86.182.168 (talk) 12:18, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


  • Alibaba have no involvement with what their members buy and sell, they just bring buyer and seller together. I think it's a bit of stretch to say that Yahoo is the world's largest online shark fin trader. --Spuzzdawg (talk) 10:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The logo on this page is incorrect. Alibaba Group is the holding company that includes Alibaba.com. I would change it if I knew how, but if someone who knows how can do it, Alibaba Group logo can be found at http://img.alibaba.com/aboutalibaba/images/alibaba_group1.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwspelich (talk • contribs) 23:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Alibaba.com and Yahoo! Back Shark Fin Traders

Alibaba Hires Ex-U.S. Official to Aid Washington Lobbying

[edit]

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-17/alibaba-hires-ex-u-s-official-to-aid-washington-lobbying.html Ottawahitech (talk) 04:43, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See headers to last edits of "...Related Controversies" section...

[edit]

by "LeProf", to see what was edited and why, in this section. One cannot use verbatim text from citations without constructing quotations, and cannot add material facts, like stock depreciations of 15% that do not appear in the cited source, etc. And one cannot have closing, opinion-laden laden text, without that also being sourced. This is not a platform for editor opinion, but for reporting published opinion on important matters from reliable business sources. (Economist-derived information was expanded, and Forbes-derived information was added to create a replacement summation.) LeProf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.123.248 (talk) 23:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed foregoing edits, and cleaned up paragraph opening adding places where citations are needed to support earlier (other editor-written) text. LeProf

What are B2C and C2C?

[edit]

Acronyms should be defined when first used, with exceptions of those that have become common English words such as laser, radar and led. David R. Ingham (talk) 19:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added definitions. Did I get everything?--Nowa (talk) 00:40, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

business to costumers 185.139.137.200 (talk) 04:27, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uranium

[edit]

Yellowcake is not raw uranium ore; it is processed uranium ore. It is not illegal to possess raw uranium ore, which, according to Wikipedia, is "weakly radioactive" and emits only alpha particles (helium nuclei) rather than the more serious gamma rays. Patrick Campbell was not arrested for smuggling, nor for possession of uranium; he was charged with knowingly brokering goods (yellowcake, in this case) destined for Iran. Most of this is irrelevant to Alibaba: I removed the misleading reference to the concealment of uranium in Campbell's shoes. C. Cerf (talk) 22:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Please remove the affiliate links, instead use direct links to Alibaba pages. Silly filters won't let me change it myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.104.91.128 (talk) 08:50, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Alibaba Group/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Some of the figures regarding the traffic has now changed/improved.The traffic on alibaba from China has gone from 65 % to 50 %. Source is on alexa

Last edited at 18:59, 16 July 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 07:18, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alibaba Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alibaba Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:36, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Factual errors? 'Largest company by revenue'

[edit]

This page lists Alibaba's revenue as $56bn but states "Its online sales and profits surpassed all US retailers (including Walmart, Amazon, and eBay) combined since 2015." yet on Walmart's page, revenue is listed as $514bn. The reference also restates this point but it seems entirely nonsensical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.129.101.143 (talk) 20:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible EL: CNBC video on Alibaba not succeeding in the US market

[edit]

Found this:

  • "Why Alibaba Gave Up On U.S. Consumers". CNBC. 2019-03-05.

WhisperToMe (talk) 09:38, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 January 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. There is consensus that this page should not be moved. There also appears to be consensus that Alibaba should be retargeted to Ali Baba (disambiguation). (closed by non-admin page mover) Jack Frost (talk) 12:40, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Alibaba Group → Alibaba – Requesting move for potentially controversial renaming. Alibaba is the WP:COMMONNAME of the company. "Alibaba" already redirects here and distinguish templates are already placed on the page for other articles with that name. Also, tech giant articles like Google, Microsoft, and Huawei use the common term instead of the official company name. (Except of course Apple and Amazon for obvious reasons. And Facebook which directs to the website article rather than the company) PyroFloe (talk) 08:43, 9 January 2021 (UTC) PyroFloe (talk) 08:43, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"阿裡巴巴公司" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 阿裡巴巴公司. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 30#阿裡巴巴公司 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Deryck C. 09:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

alibaba trade assurance is nor worth the paper it written on

[edit]

why i live in new zealand I bought some chairs on Alibaba that where faulty I a made a claim I was told it was not made in 30days

there is now can you buy from alibaba ship from china to new zealand and make a CLAIM in 30 days it is impossible

On the acquisition ot the South China Morning Post

[edit]

I believe there to be an error in section 3.6

In December 2015, Alibaba agreed to acquire the South China Morning Post and other media assets belonging to the group for a consideration of $266 million. Although Alibaba promised editorial independence, vice-chairman Joseph Tsai said that Alibaba believes that "the world needs a plurality of views when it comes to China coverage. China's rise as an economic power and its importance to world stability is too important for there to be a singular thesis." The acquisition attracted media concerns over what this would mean for the newspaper's coverage.

I don't see how an Alibaba vice-chairman assuring the South Chhina Morning Post will keep publishing articles with views that don't follow the rules of typical articles from the mainland is something that could attract concern for the newspaper's future coverage, since that's already what the newspaper was doing. Could someone fix this? Right now it doesn't make sense that this statement would have attracted media concerns, it must've been about something else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.134.78.214 (talk) 15:51, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hereby I propose to add the figures of Revenue, Net profit and Employees for the years 2016-2023 as these are neutral data and shown in other company's articles, too. WikiPate (talk) 16:52, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trendyol?

[edit]

missing information about trendyol, they basically own it 159.146.49.123 (talk) 08:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alibaba_Group&oldid=1234425635"