Jump to content

Talk:Andrea Dworkin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAndrea Dworkin has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 30, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 19, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
March 16, 2016Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

26 March 2024

[edit]

I quote from the article:

> But their love was expressed sexually on occasion, intimately and with affection and passion.

What on God's green earth is this doing in an encyclopedia article? This entire article is not written from an encyclopedic, neutral point of view. This needs to be fixed. — goethean 17:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Goethean: JFYI, the content in question was added by PaulThePony on May 6, 2022. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 13:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy, criticism

[edit]

§ Criticism says there has been sharply polarizing debate about Dworkin's views. This looks like original research since all the subsequent sources are individuals either criticizing or defending Dworkin. For WP:BALANCE we should be looking for sources that describe the "debate" itself from a disinterested viewpoint. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 13:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This is a common problem in sections titled "Criticism" which is why WP style guides discourage them. Ashmoo (talk) 17:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]