Talk:Battle of Wytyczno

Military history: European / Polish / Russian & Soviet / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Polish military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Result

Why is the result field empty in the infobox? --Irpen 23:31, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To make you feel better adding it yourself? Nyah, only joking. In fact I was weavering between "Soviet victory" and "Polish defeat", with the latter being IMO a tad more correct. Halibu tt 13:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will leave this to you first. Almost every time I changed or wrote anything in the outcome rather than a "Polish victory", I was almost accused in being a Polonophobe. When someone comes here wanting to change this to a "Polish victory" in line with most other battles the fact the "Polish defeat" was written by a Polish editor may be helpful to preseve some resemblance to the reality. --Irpen 17:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]