Talk:Chuck Dixon

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comics: Creators / United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comics creators work group.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Dr Light?

In the Marvel section there is a listing for Dr. Light. Since a character of this name has been in use by DC for many years it seems unlikely there was ever a Marvel comic with this name, and the only solo Dr. Light story I can find in DC (in Showcase '96 #8) was written by someone else.

Reply to above: This is erroneous information. There was no comicbook called Dr Light published by Marvel comics. Sadly, the official dixon site even picked up the snafu, beleived it to be true, and lists this non-existant comic. The listing for Dr Light should be deleted.

Dixon's statements on the issue of homosexuality should be discussed on his wiki. He claims not to be homophobic, but his statements that comics are for kids and should not have complicex social issues such as homosexuality goes against his own previous body of work which did bring up complex real-life issues from time to time.

I agree. A specific (and very recent) example is the Grifter/Midnighter 6-issue miniseries published earlier this year, written by Dixon. The book is clearly not for "kids", if the criteria for kid material means a series has no homosexuality, no complex social issues, etc. I mean, how could you really write a "kid's book" involving the Authority (And specifically a gay member/the most violent member)? When did Dixon ever say that comic books should be for kids? I'd like to see the source on that. Also, don't forget to sign your posts. Zebraic 07:12, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too Coloquial

Anyone feel as if the main article is too coloquial. Also, what's up with the capitalisations? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.60.173 (talk) 17:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Political controversy

WP:BLP won't allow that section to stand for long - it needs sourcing or removing. (Emperor (talk) 17:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

All claims have now been given appropriate citations, including the mentioned post by Dixon himself. --CmdrClow (talk) 03:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed, "In the first page of Huntress #1, he also cited labor unions as "maybe" an example of organized crime, comparable to dope, prostitution, and gambling."

That issue came out way back in 1994 and there was NOOOOOOOOOOOOO controversy. And Dixon did not suggest that labor unions were part of organized crime. Huntress narrates on the first page, "Most people think of organized crime and they think of dope. Or gambling. Or prostitution. Or maybe unions. Daffodils don't normally come to mind."

The unions were no more upset over this quote that the casinos where. Some editor's just trying to create a controversy were one never existed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.89.143.78 (talk) 15:46, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the 'controversy' section of this article, as it was poorly sourced (see WP:BLP) and in any case pretty trivial. Unless anyone can demonstrate that his political opinions are significant or have caused some notable controversy, they don't belong in the article. Robofish (talk) 00:44, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chuck Dixon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130717180131/http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17962 to http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17962

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alt-White

No treatment on his recent collaborations with Vox Day, such as his book where President Trump is a superhero defeating aliens with a Space Force, or his Alt-Hero Q, about a shadowy group of anonymous bureaucrats are methodically tanking and spoiling each of President Trump's actions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.32.137.98 (talk) 00:45, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this looks like a major oversight. Reliable sources are required, that cover this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.97.170.112 (talk) 10:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]