Jump to content

Talk:Daṇḍin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Well, the question is: Is the form Dandi more preferable than Dandin? In my opinon, it is not.

Why? Dandi in Sanskrit is the nominative singular of the stem form Dandin. However, it is quite common in Western language works on Indian literature to use the stem form, that is Dandin. Look into the standard reference works of Sanskrit literature, e.g. Arthur A. MacDonell: "A history of Sanskrit literature", London 1900 (often reprinted)

Moriz Winternitz: "Geschichte der indischen Litteratur", Leipzig 1908-20, 3 vols. (Engl. transl. under the title: "A history of Indian literature", 1927-33, often reprinted)

Arthur B. Keith: "A history of Sanskrit literature", Oxford 1928

Surendranath Dasgupta: "A history of Sanskrit literature: classical period", 2nd ed., Calcutta 1962

Helmuth von Glasenapp: "Die Literaturen Indiens", Stuttgart 1961

and many others.

One point more: If you dare changing Dandin into Dandi than it would logically involve to change all occurrences of Sanskrit names and titles in the Wikipedia into the nominative singular forms, too. Look into the Wikipedia article Sanskrit Literature; you have to change Ramayana into Rāmāyaṇam, Mahabharata into Mahābhāratam, Valmiki into Vālmīkiḥ, Rama into Rãmaḥ, Ravana into Rāvaṇaḥ, Panini into Pāṇiniḥ, Bhasa into Bhāsaḥ, Kalidasa into Kālidāsaḥ and so on. I have used UTF-8 encoding here for the diacritics; without diacritics it would look like Ramayanam, Mahabharatam, Ramah, Ravanah, Paninih, Bhasah, Kalidasah.

If you write in an Indian language like Sanskrit than you may use the nominative form, i.e. Daṇḍī, because it is the custom there to use an inflected form of a name. Modern Indian languages like Hindi, Bengali, Marathi stick generally to this custom and use the nominative. But here we are in the English language Wikipedia! So let's stay with English language customs.

Let's sum up: 1. Dandin is used in nearly all Western language reference works (I have named only a few here). 2. Switching to Dandi would involve changing a lot of other entries, too. 3. English language custom of using Sanskrit terms.

Bye Peter

I agree with Peter's argument above wholeheartedly. I would even take out "Sri" from the title. Gomukha.

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enumeration of metahpor

[edit]

I would very much be grateful if someone could add a discussion of the types of metaphor mentioned in chapter 2 of the Kavyadarsa. Tibetologist (talk) 15:20, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daṇḍin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:08, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daṇḍin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Daṇḍin&oldid=1194928290"