Talk:Indiana Jones (comics)
| Indiana Jones (comics) was a Language and literature good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
[edit]This review is transcluded from Talk:Indiana Jones comic books/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is a good start, but it's only that and nothing more. Hardly any in-depth information or background history. Needs expansion.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- Dark Horse Comics 1990 section is mostly unreferenced
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Main problem is that the article is very short, includes little in-depth information. Needs serious expansion, especially since the comics go back to the 1980s. Check your library, online archives and other reliable sources such as books, journals, newspapers and magazine articles.
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wackymacs (talk • contribs)
Indiana Jones extended universe?
[edit]Do the Indiana Jones comics (at least one of either publishers) form a continuity?--Baruch ben Alexander - ☠☢☣ 23:51, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indiana Jones (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080410031742/http://indianajones.ugo.com/?cur=comic-books to http://indianajones.ugo.com/?cur=comic-books
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Update needed
[edit]The article's introduction ends with a reference to something that was expected to happen in 2008. That was 12 years ago.
Since I don't know enough about the franchise to be able to update the page, I have added the "Update" template to the page.
--Rob Kelk 14:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Newspaper Strip
[edit]There was a Young Indiana Jones strip serialized weekly in the Young Telegraph section of the UK Daily Telegraph newspaper. Was it an adaptation of the comics or an original series..? ntnon (talk) 01:35, 16 October 2022 (UTC)