Talk:Journal Editorial Report

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

There is no evidence to back up the claim that the PBS incarnation of this program was on the air for the reason that it was a countebalance to a liberal program. That sounds more like a POV speculation than a fact - since there are no sources cited. It was added by an editor user:Calwatch who has since "quit" Wikipedia.

The later statements that the program is "soley conservative" because its panel is "conservative OR libertarian" contradicts itself - libertarians are not a subset of conservatives - and the statement is not supported by any facts or cited sources. This was part of the expanision of the article by user:Clindhartsen, who identifies his political leanings as "to the right".

The statement "since the show has aired" is too open ended since the show continues to air (as of September 2007). That text was written in June 2006, so it can only state that "up until June 2006" - even if the statement is true and verifiable. This consideration about not using words that convey "as of when I wrote this" without saying when it was written is contained in section 10 of the Wikipedia style guide

I'll take a stab at adding in more information and keep my head down.-StreamingRadioGuide 16:45, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Loose ends... the program was classified as a "Political Debate" show, which is clearly wrong. Not being familiar with existing categorization of TV shows, it might need some tweaking... but it definitely is not a "here are two sides of the issue and argue over who is right" type of show.

I removed the link to Paul Gigot's bio. External links should be related to the topic of the article (the show), not its host. The right place for that link is on Paul Gigot's page.StreamingRadioGuide