Talk:Most Gracious Majesty

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Royalty Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Merge

I personally don't know whether this article can stand up on its own given the existence of Forms of address in the United Kingdom SGGH ^speak! 17:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Tanthalas39 (talk) 17:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Info will be added over time, dont be to hasty. Besides it more than merits its own article! --Camaeron (talk) 18:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the similarities in the comparison between this article and Forms of address in the United Kingdom. This one is more anagolous to Majesty, Royal Highness, Serene Highness and the like, and if they exist, there's no reason for this one not to. --G2bambino (talk) 18:41, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We should at least allow the article a chance to expand. GoodDay (talk) 18:43, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with both G2 and GoodDay...--Camaeron (talk) 18:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The first poster is inviting you to justify your article. He's right to. Please tell us why it can't or shouldn't be dealt with in Your Majesty. It's fine to add more info later but you still need to justify it. It is a variant of Your Majesty, after all.--Gazzster (talk) 18:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Gracious Majesty is a destinctly British and Commonwealth version of Your Majesty. Your Majesty has much wider usage (it is used throughout Europe and the world). Before this article was created Your Gracious Majesty didn't even have a mention in Your Majesty. Also, Britannic Majesty has its own article also although one could argue that it too is "only" a variant of YOur Majesty. --Camaeron (talk) 19:02, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Satisfies me.--Gazzster (talk) 19:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If we do have to merge this page I would prefer it being merged with Your Majesty, as opposed to Forms of address in the United Kingdom. It makes more sense..--Camaeron (talk) 19:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As of now the article has been improved. When am I allowed to delete the merger template? --Camaeron (talk) 21:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever you like, IMHO. GoodDay (talk) 16:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO? --Camaeron (talk) 19:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, In My Humble Opinon. It's internet jargon. GoodDay (talk) 17:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the page is safe for now! yay! --Camaeron (talk) 15:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]