Jump to content

Talk:Puget Sound region

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Created page per consensus Talk:Puget_Sound#Split_article.3F - Michael J Swassing (talk) 04:04, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll check that discussion, but is it just me or is this article near-identical with Puget Sound? Also, given that the capital-R name designation does exist, wouldn't Puget Sound Region be a more appropraite title?Skookum1 (talk) 14:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Port capacity

[edit]

The line about the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma being the largest after Long Beach needs reconciling, and comparison, with information on Port of Vancouver and Port Metro Vancouver.....Skookum1 (talk) 17:45, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was skeptical too, once you pointed it out. But looking into it, it seems to be true. The PDF reference I added, here, does not say so explicitly, but a quick glance makes it clear. Measured in terms of metric tons of containerized cargo, Seattle + Tacoma appears to come in second for the continent, after Los Angeles + Long Beach. Vancouver is about tied with Seattle in this regard. Measured in terms of total containers, it looks like New York/New Jersey comes in second and Seattle/Tacoma third (4,792,922 vs. 4,154,376, if I have my math right). Perhaps I should add that factoid to the page (only just realized it writing this now). Pfly (talk) 04:55, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oop, third largest on both counts. Edited page to say so. Pfly (talk) 04:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Physical geography section

[edit]

I tagged this section as off-topic. Most of the material here is about Puget Sound and it belongs there. In fact, a main article link to Puget Sound is probably appropriate. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 12:34, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Puget Sound region. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:50, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Puget Sound region. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Puget Sound region. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:48, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Puget_Sound_region&oldid=1201358726"