Talk:Tikvah Alper

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tikvah Alper article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 7 June 2013 by reviewer Anne Delong (talk · contribs).

Women scientists Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Central Dogma

This is a very nice article but it contains an error.

The article states: "Alper and colleagues[10] reported these properties of the scrapie agent - a finding that was greeted with astonishment in many quarters, for it appeared to contravene the central dogma that holds that replication (and hence the growth of the disease and its infectious properties) can only proceed via DNA."

This is a misunderstanding of what the Central Dogma is and I would not include any reference to the central dogma here. What the article author may be thinking of is a combination of the cell theory and Koch's postulates. I'm not sure. But to be safe, just stick to the facts of the matter.

Instead write something like this: Alper and colleagues[10] reported these properties of the scrapie agent - a finding that was greeted with astonishment in many quarters, for it contravened the belief that all infectious diseases propagate in the body through the multiplication of cells or viruses by means of DNA or RNA."

Eperotao (talk) 01:10, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I want to retract this suggestion to omit reference to Central Dogma. But the statement still seems wrong to me as written. Wasn't it the discovery that the beta sheet version of the scrapie prion protein could TURN normal the alpha helix version into a beta sheet what contravened the central dogma? The idea that the information in the folding of a protein could change the folding of another version of the same protein violated that idea that information can only flow from DNA to RNA to protein (not protein to protein).

Eperotao (talk) 20:00, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]