Jump to content

Template talk:ISO standards

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I changed the numbering

[edit]

The template was grouped by

  • 1-9k
  • 10k-20k
  • 20k-

but I changed it to say

  • 1 to 9999
  • 10000 to 19999
  • 20000+

It looks a little uglier but it is more correct. Jason Quinn (talk) 20:13, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There may be some merit in splitting the numbers up the same was as in the List of International Organization for Standardization standards article, for the sake of consistency, ie:
    • 1-999
    • 1000-9999
    • 10000-19999
    • 20000-29999
    • 30000-39999
    • 40000+ (This doesn't match the article, which only has 80000)
Mitch Ames (talk) 04:39, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding ISO 21500 Guidance for Project Management

[edit]

I am writing several articles on project management as part of the ASCE Body of Knowledge project ( or ASCE BoK) as well as the Project Management Institute Body of Knowledge project ( or PM BoK). ISO cites and parallels a lot of the materials.... Thanks ...

Risk Engineer (talk) 17:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2019

[edit]

Include ISO 26262 Standard in the list (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_26262) Cynosure1 (talk) 23:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ย Done โ€“ Jonesey95 (talk) 07:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BRINT for 14496-10

[edit]

Can we get 14496-10 updated for WP:BRINT? The article seems to have been renamed. It should link directly to Advanced Video Coding (avoiding the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC redirect). Thank you. 50.53.23.14 (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ย Done ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿค๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿบ๐ช๐‘ค๐’†๐“‡๐Ÿท๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿœ๐“บ๐”ด๐•–๐–—๐Ÿฐ (๐—๐—ฎ๐˜ญ๐™ ) 22:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4: Thank you. 50.53.23.14 (talk) 23:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can we get 23090-3 added? It should link to Versatile Video Coding. This can be seen at MPEG-I โ€” MPEG. Thank you. 50.53.23.14 (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page you linked does not mention the standard, so I don't know if this should be done yet. ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿค๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿบ๐ช๐‘ค๐’†๐“‡๐Ÿท๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿœ๐“บ๐”ด๐•–๐–—๐Ÿฐ (๐—๐—ฎ๐˜ญ๐™ ) 22:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4: Well if you won't take that one how about this one which certainly means it is published ("Stage: 60.00 (Under publication)" as of 2021-01-20): https://www.iso.org/standard/73022.html 50.53.23.14 (talk) 22:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ย Done ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿค๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿบ๐ช๐‘ค๐’†๐“‡๐Ÿท๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿœ๐“บ๐”ด๐•–๐–—๐Ÿฐ (๐—๐—ฎ๐˜ญ๐™ ) 12:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]