Jump to content

User:Cassiopeia/NPPS/WikiLinuz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, welcome to your New Page Patrol School page! Every person I instruct will have their own page on which I will give them support and tasks for them to complete. Please make sure you have this page added to your watchlist. Your NPP School page has been specifically designed according to you and what you have requested instruction in - for that reason, please be as specific as possible when under my instruction, so that I know the best ways to help you (and do not be afraid to let me know if you think something isn't working).

Make sure you read through Wikipedia:Notability as that's the knowledge which most of the questions I ask you and tasks you do will revolve around.

How to use this page

This page will be built up over your time in the Academy, with new sections being added as you complete old ones. Each section will end with a task, written in bold type - this might just ask a question, or it might require you to go and do something. You can answer a question by typing the answer below the task; if you have to do something, you will need to provide diffs to demonstrate that you have completed the task. Some sections will have more than one task, sometimes additional tasks may be added to a section as you complete them. Please always sign your responses to tasks as you would on a talk page.

If both the instructor and student make completing the course curriculum a top priority, it will generally take around a month to go through the entirety of the curriculum. This pace is not required or necessarily expected, but rather is provided in order to give participants an idea of what to expect.

Notability

[edit]

PART 1

When patrolling or reviewing an article, you may often come across articles do not meet the WP:N guidelines, but the editors make the edits in good faith. Please read WP:AGF and do not WP:BITE the new editors.

A. Notability is a test guidelines to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article in Wikipedia mainspace. Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, General Notability Guidelines, Specific Notability Guidelines, Stand-alone list before completing the following tasks.


General notability guidelines

[edit]

1. In your own words, why it is important to WP:AGF and not WP:BITE new editors.

Answer: Most of the newcomers who join Wikipedia isn't necessarily familiar with the WP:POLICIES, followed convention and culture of Wikipedia. We all are, somepoint in the past, newcomers ourselves. Since Wikipedia a community of WP:VOLUNTEERs, every newcomers has potency to make significant contribution to the project and biting newcomers, who contribute in good faith, isn't helping anyone, rather it's discouraging them from making valuable contributions in future. WikiLinuz (talk) 10:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. Neweditors might not aware of Wikipedia guidlines/policies and if the edit is not helpful but contribute in good faith, it is best to behave in a civilized manner to explain the edit instead of biting the editor so the new editors would learn about Wikipedia and continue to edit Wikipedia. Cassiopeia talk 04:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


2. In your own words, how is notability defined in Wikipedia?

Answer: General notability in Wikipedia is defined as a topic which had received a significant coverage i.e. a WP:RELIABLE WP:SECONDARY source material, which is WP:INDEPENDENT of the subject being mentioned, gives WP:DUE weightage to a topic which the subject addresses. Although, there are subject specific guidelines, the general idea of notability remains the same. WikiLinuz (talk) 10:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. In Wikipedia, notability means "worthy to be noted" - it is defined as a topic is "presumably" notable for stand-alone article or list if (1) it has received significant coverage with reliable sources that are independent of the subject where by the sources talk "directly" about the subject in depth and in length and not only passing mentioned and (2) it is not excluded under the What WP:Wikipedia is not policy. Cassiopeia talk 04:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)



3. Does a step by step instructions on how to "Change a car tire" considered a notable topic in Wikipedia?

Answer: No, Wikipedia is WP:NOTGUIDE. Although inclusion of car tire as a descriptive one is within the context of an encyclopedia, having a "guideline", "tutorial" or "step by step instruction" goes against what an encyclopedia is and violates Wikipedia's policies. WikiLinuz (talk) 10:31, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 04:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


4. What are the differences between A WP:GNG and a specific notability guidelines? how do we determine which one to use when patrolling an article?

Answer: I view subject specific notability as a subset or extension to general notability guidelines. Some topics, such as a dedicated article on a book or a WP:COMPANY, have a specific community consensus which gets added as policies to help patrollers determine notability. When patrolling an article, once we figured which subject specific category an article falls into, we shall consider those specific guidelines along with WP:GNG to estimate notability. WikiLinuz (talk) 10:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. Both can be used when patrolling but those subject falls under SNG/SSG (sport specific guidelines) but fails to meet the WP:GNG guidelines would sometimes nominated for deletion WP:AfD for discussion to determine the status of the article and often time the aritcles would be voted for keep as some subject would hard to meet the indepdend sources requirement such as WP:NACADEMIC. (We will cover AfD in later assignment). Cassiopeia talk 04:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


Specific notability guidelines

[edit]

5. If an editor creates an article about "2024 Summer Olympics" in 2019 without providing any sources, is the subject considered not notable and why?

Answer: This specific article falls under WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:NEWSEVENT categories, hence I shall consider those subject specific relevant policies. If there is no verifiable reliable sources cited in support of the event, it goes against Wikipedia's policies on notability. Since Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL, every WP:FUTUREEVENT must meet notability criteria. So, yes, the subject is not notable. WikiLinuz (talk) 11:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. However, for such reputable event for 2024 we would be able to find plenty of sources to support the subject (the event). As a good practice, if the reviewer familiar with the subject, we would find sources and place it in the article (inline citation) (I have done it countless of time), so the article can be accepted and place it on the main space of Wikipedia. Cassiopeia talk 04:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


B. Without considered of sources/content policies and review just based on "subject specific notability" (SSN) "alone" for sake of the exercises below, please answer if the subject meets the SSN guidelines, based on the given content below, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.


6. A New York city based 2021 start up software company , specializing in data mining, has just received a USD 200K investor fund.

Answer: Does not meet WP:CORP notability. Because, numeric figures like funds doesn't establish notability. WikiLinuz (talk) 11:28, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY.


7. Tagir Ulanbekov who is a Ultimate Fighting Championships fighters with the undefeated mixed martial arts record of 10-1.

Answer: Does meet WP:ATHLETE notability. Because, as per WP:NMMA, Ulanbekov fought more than three professional fights and Ultimate Fighting Championships meets WP:MMATIER top-tier MMA organization criteria. WikiLinuz (talk) 11:33, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

☒N Subject fails WP:NMMA for not secure at least 3 fights under top tier promotion. At the moment he has only one fight under UFC. Cassiopeia talk 04:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


8. A upcoming action drama title "Suleiman the Great" based on the the life of Suleiman the Magnificent, was reported will be in production in December 2021 and to be released on August 2022 in the cinemas.

Answer: Does meets not WP:NTV notability. Because, as per WP:TVSHOW, a series or drama only meets notability if it had already started fliminig. But since the report only states will be in production in December 2021, it doesn't meet the criteria. WikiLinuz</spa n> (talk) 11:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY If the action drama is a film, it is also fails WP:NFF - it is because the production start date in December 2021. Cassiopeia talk 04:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)



9. A political candidates, without any previous or current political position, who is running for November 2021 election for a Senator position in United States with multiple local newspapers coverage of his candidacy.

Answer: Does not meet WP:BIO notability. Because, an unelected WP:POLITICIAN candidate for office, such as a Senator position, doesn't meet criteria of its own article. WikiLinuz (talk) 11:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. Fails WP:POLITICIAN as just running for a position is not enough. Cassiopeia talk 04:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


10. A singer who self produced his first album in May 2020 and his songs are listed in Spotify.

Answer: Does not meet WP:NMUSIC notability. Because, as per WP:NALBUM#1, self-published works of a singer isn't notable, since they also fail WP:ENTERTAINER criteria on WP:BIO notability. The subject also fails WP:SINGER#1 since they only produced self produced album. WikiLinuz (talk) 12:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. Subject fails all WP:SINGER SSN notability guideline Cassiopeia talk 04:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


C. Based on which SSN guidelines the below subjects are notable under (1) which notability criteriaMUSICBI#1 (if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations

11. Carlos Alós-Ferrer

Answer: Meets WP:NACADEMIC#8. The subject was editor in chief of Journal of Economic Psychology, which meets the criteria since any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable. WikiLinuz (talk) 12:13, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. Subject meets criteria 1 for WP:NPROF #1 [1] for being highly cited and #8 as the chief editor of Journal of Economic Psychology [2]. Cassiopeia talk 04:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


12. Alistair Overeem

Answer: Meets WP:NKICK and WP:NMMA. The subject has was a fighter in multiple top-tier MMA and kickboxing organizations that passes WP:MMATIER, additionally, they also holds world titles in MMA and K-1 which meets WP:NKICK#1. WikiLinuz (talk) 12:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)


13. Jennifer Lopez

Answer: Meets WP:ENTERTAINER#1 and WP:NSONG. The subject had acted in multiple notable films, such as Anaconda_(film) and Out of Sight. They also casted with multiple singers, such as Selena Quintanilla-Pérez and sung in notable songs and music videos. WikiLinuz (talk) 12:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY - WP:NSONG is about the song and not the singer. Subject meets WP:ENTERTAINER - 1,2,3; WP:SINGER - almost all criteria and WP:NACTOR as she has featured in major roles in many movies. Cassiopeia talk 04:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


14. Three Mile Island accident

Answer: Meets WP:EVENTCRITERIA since it's mentioned as the most significant accident in U.S. commercial nuclear power plant history by multiple reliable sources. WikiLinuz (talk) 12:51, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. WP:EVENTCRIT - 1, 2; WP:EFFECT and WP:GEOSCOPE. Next time, pls provide "which specify which notability criteria" of the SSN as mentioned in the section B instructions. Cassiopeia talk 04:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


15. Persepolis

Answer: Meets WP:GEOFEAT since it's both recognized as a cultural heritage by UNESCO and notable as a result of its history. WikiLinuz (talk) 12:51, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. Populated as a historical city of its civilizations. Cassiopeia talk 04:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


Communications

[edit]
WikiLinuz, Good day. See assignment 1 above.
(1) For all the assignments, pls provide hist diffs of the articles, reverts, edits, reports, results of the reports, talk page messages that are applicable.
(2) Pls provide guidelines where applicable and justify/explain in details of your application or analysis.
(3) Pls ping me if you need assistance (here in this program page at the communication section of every assignment).
(4) Please book mark this page and ping me when you have finished the assignment for me to review.
(5) If you need to take a break from editing Wikipedia for more than 2 weeks, pls inform me so I may know. If you Stay safe and best. Welcome to NPPS.
Cassiopeia talk 08:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
@Cassiopeia: I've published my answers to the above assignment. Please check it out at your earliest convenience. Thanks, WikiLinuz (talk) 12:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
WikiLinuz, See comments above and pls let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to the next assignment. (Note: pls add additional ":" (colon) from the previous message thread for one space indentation to the right to separate the messages as this is the Wikipedia communication protocol. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 04:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
@Cassiopeia: Thank you for your remarks. I'm ready to move on to the next assignment. WikiLinuz (talk) 12:27, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


Sources

[edit]

Background for trainees

[edit]
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for such content claimed should be supported by independent (secondary), reliable sources for verification. Please read WP:RS, WP:IS, WP:RSP, WP:V, WP:PROVEIT, WP:Primary, WP:Secondary, and WP:Tertiary and answered the the below questions in your own words.
You could contact WP:RX if you could not find the sources yourself either on web due to Paywall content or printed books.


Exercises

[edit]
1.
Topic Explanation 5 Examples Comment by Cass
Reliable source Common way to classify a source's reliability is to determine if a WP:PUBLISHED, verifiable and has a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Determining a particular source's reliability is subjective to the type of source. If it's an academic journal, we make sure it's not a predatory or non-peer-reviewed journal. If it's a published work in magazines, we check for the reputation of the author. If it's a book, we make sure it's published through scholarly printing presses and the scholar have a reputation for their scholarships. WikiLinuz (talk) 22:12, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
  1. The Guardian
  2. The Washington Post
  3. JSTOR
  4. IEEE Intelligent Systems
  5. The New York Times
  6. Princeton University Press
 checkY. JSTOR is digital library and it can not be the source. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
User-generated sources User-generated sources are the ones whose content is largely composed of users' opinions, thoughts, etc. which are neither subjected to peer-review nor fact-checking. Some websites act as a medium to host their user's content for their online presence. These sources should not be considered reliable, since any user could post anything which includes false information, unsubstantiated medical claims, etc. However, few sources, such as a Tweet from an academic which is posed under a verified Twitter account can be considered as WP:PRIMARY, although care should be given when using such sources on Wikipedia. WikiLinuz (talk) 22:12, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
  1. Twitter
  2. Facebook
  3. 4Chan
  4. Stack Overflow
  5. 9GAG
 checkY. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Non-Independent source A source is considered non-independent if it is closely affiliated with the subject. Many reliable publications publish paid articles that are WP:SPONSORED by third-party and mostly written by authors with conflict of interest. These sources are not considered reliable since it's explicitly paid to bypass the editorial process to promote a particular POV for the purposes of advertisement and promotion. WikiLinuz (talk) 22:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
  1. Global Times is closely affiliated with Chinese Communist Party
  2. National Herald is closely affiliated with INC
  3. Sputnik is closely affiliated with Russian govt.
  4. Vatican News is not independent of Pope Francis
  5. The New York Times is not independent of A. G. Sulzberger
 checkY. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)



2.
Type Explanation Sources (15 Primary ; 5 Secondary ; 5 Tertiary) Comment by Cass
Primary A first-person narrative of an event, which is written by people who are directly involved or witnesses. A research paper of an independent study of a phenomenon. WikiLinuz (talk) 23:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
  1. (example) scientific journal articles reporting experimental research results
  2. The original diary of Anne Frank is a primary source on her.
  3. The Story of My Experiments with Truth is a primary source on Mohandas Gandhi.
  4. A YouTube video of Steve Jobs's Commencement address at Stanford University is a primary source one him.
  5. An English translation of the verses of the Bhagavad Gita is a primary source for Mahabharata.
  6. A research paper from Oxford University is a primary source for AstraZeneca Vaxzevria.
  7. A press release from the director of the National Security Agency regarding leak of NSA documents by Edward Snowden is a primary source on the event.
  8. The personal website of J. K. Rowling is a primary source for materials on her.
  9. The report produced by Facebook's engineering team is a primary source for the 2021 Facebook outage.
  10. A Tweet released by Bill Gates regarding the divorce is a primary source on the event.
  11. The activities on Jehovah's Witnesses's website is a primary source for their works.
  12. The document from Vatican's website regarding the sixtieth Perugia-Assisi March for Peace is a primary source for Pope Francis.
  13. Mein Kampf is a primary source for the manifesto of Hitler.
  14. Boulevard of Broken Dreams's audio song is a primary for Green Day.
  15. Linus Torvalds's 2016 Ted talk on the Linux is a primary source for the history and evolution of Linux.
  16. An interview between Richard Stallman and David Pakman in his podcast is a primary source for Free Software Foundation.
  17. An interview of Sam Esmail on Upcoming is a primary source for the show Mr. Robot.
 checkY. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Secondary A source that interprets and analyzes the primary and provides the author of the source's own thinking based on the primary source is a secondary source. WikiLinuz (talk) 23:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
  1. (example) newspaper
  2. The Washington Post article regarding Facebook outage.
  3. The New York Times article on Frances Haugen's U.S Congres testimony.
  4. Peer-reviewed journals such as JSTOR and IEEE Intelligent Systems.
  5. Biography of Alan Turing by Anna Revell.
  6. The Rāmāyaṇa of Vālmīki by Robert P. Goldman.
 checkY. Note: JSTOR is a digital library so it can not be the source. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Tertiary Sources which are encyclopedic, such as other scholarly publications which summarize primary and secondary sources. WikiLinuz (talk) 23:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
  1. (example) encyclopedias
  2. Encyclopædia Britannica
  3. Lexico
  4. Introduction to Algorithms by Thomas H. Cormen
  5. Encyclopaedia of Islam
  6. Academic American Encyclopedia
 checkY. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)



3.


Subject Primary Secondary Tertiary Comment by Cass
Example: Art Example:Sculpture Example:Article critiquing the sculpture Example:Encyclopedic article on the sculptor
History Mark Twain's own autobiography, 1906 by Mark Twain A review by Tim Adams for The Guardian. Autobiography of Mark Twain Wikipedia article checkY. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Science Original paper on perception by Frank Rosenblatt Scholarly report by University of Massachusetts. Britannica article on preceptron. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Athletes Usain Bolt's original video clip of 100m world record. Report by Ollie Williams for BBC. People.com profile for Usain Bolt which summarizes his achievements. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)



4. Please explain in your own words why the content claimed needs to be verified?

Answer: Since Wikipedia is not a platform for original thoughts, any readers of the encyclopedia should be able to verify where the piece of information that's included comes from in order to trust that it comes through a reliable medium. It's also important to WP:NPOV, one of the core content policies. WikiLinuz (talk) 22:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. Content needs to verifiable so we may know where the info/source from for we could know if the source is independent and/or reliable; however, NPOV has nothing to do with verifiability. (note: We will discuss NPOV in Assignment 3). Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)


5.Could we used Wikipedia as the source? and why?

Answer: No, Wikipedia is not a reliable source and using Wikipedia article as a source in another article is WP:CIRCULAR. WikiLinuz (talk) 22:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)


6.Give an example and explain why a source is reliable but not independent of a subject?

Answer: The Washington Post is reliable per WP:RSP, but it's owned by Nash Holdings LLC, the company now owned by Jeff Bezos, hence it's neither independent of Nash Holdings LLC nor Bezos. I'd take reports by The Washing Post about its parent companies such as AWS, Amazon, or Twitch with a grain of salt too. WikiLinuz (talk) 22:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)


7.Give an example and explain why a source is independent source but not reliable?

Answer: Reports produced by The Canary about English Defence League, since it's evidently proven as a left-wing news publication, it is unreliable for the reports on EDL although it's independent of the subject. WikiLinuz (talk) 22:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY It doesnt matter if the left or right wing publication. The point here is that the source is not a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)


Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" for no or "?" after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".

Example Article about Bill Gates

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/williamhgates/ No Linkedin is considered not independent as the info is provided by the subject. No Since the content is self-published, thus it is considered not a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy source Yes The source provide significant info about the subject ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.


8.
David Petraeus

David Howell Petraeus AO (/pɪˈtreɪ.əs/; born November 7, 1952) is a retired United States Army general and public official. He served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011,[1] until his resignation on November 9, 2012[2] after his affair with Paula Broadwell was reported.[3]

Petraeus was born in Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, the son of Sixtus Petraeus (1915–2008),[4] a sea captain from Franeker, Netherlands.[5]


In 2003, Petraeus commanded the 101st Airborne Division in the fall of Baghdad[6][7]


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/09/david-petraeus-cia-resign-nbc/1695271/ Yes Source is independent of the subject being covered. Yes Reliabel per WP:RSP for its robust editorial process. Yes Source provides significient coverage about the subject. ✔ Yes
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2011/09/06/petraeus-sworn-into-cia.cnn?iref=allsearch Yes Independent of subject. Yes Reliable. Yes Source provides significient coverage about the subject. ✔ Yes
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/david-petraeus-paula-broadwell_n_2118893 Yes The source is independent of the subject being covered. No The politics section of HuffPost is considered to be biased and marked as "no consensus" at WP:RSP Yes The source provides significant coverage about the subject. ✘ No
https://www.geni.com/people/Sixtus-Petraeus/6000000015418360012 No Geni is an open wiki which is a type of self-published source. No The sources is considered to be generally unreliable per WP:RSP. Yes The source provides significant coverage about the subject. ✘ No
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/05/petraeus-exclusive-201005 Yes The source is independent of the subject being covered. Yes WP:VANITYFAIR reliable per WP:RSP. Yes The source provides significant coverage about the subject. ✔ Yes
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/beyond/interviews/petraeus.html No The source is not independent because the subject is the interviewee. No Interview is a self-published sources about the subject. Yes The source provides significant coverage about the subject. ✘ No
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/david-petraeus-general-surge-401740.html Yes The source is independent of the subject being covered. Yes Reliable per WP:RSP Yes The source provides significant coverage about the subject. ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "Petraeus sworn in as CIA director". CNN. Retrieved October 11, 2019.
  2. ^ Johnson, Kevin (November 9, 2012). "David Petraeus resigns from CIA". USA Today. Retrieved November 9, 2012.
  3. ^ "Petraeus Shocked By Girlfriend's Emails". HuffPost. 2012-11-12. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  4. ^ "Sixtus Petraeus". geni.com.
  5. ^ "David Petraeus' Winning Streak". Vanity Fair. March 30, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2019.
  6. ^ "beyond baghdad". www.pbs.org. 2004-02-12. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  7. ^ "David Petraeus: General Surge". The Independent. 2007-09-08. Retrieved 2019-10-11.



9. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: WP:DEPTH—CIA director's affair had received in-depth coverage in multiple major news magazines; WP:ANYBIO#1—Per the Independent UK source, Petraeus had awarded General George C Marshall Award for the top graduate of the US Army Command; meets WP:SOLDIER#4 since commanded the 101st Airborne Division. WikiLinuz (talk) 06:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY (1) PBS is generally considered a reliable source but since the article is a interview the source is reliable but not independent. 2. Huffpost - Although HuffPost contributors is considered not reliable in WP:RSP but if we look closely, the piece is written by By ANNE FLAHERTY, KIMBERLY DOZIER AND ADAM GOLDMAN, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. The Associated press is considered reliable source as they sell their news to other news agencies. However, the content is based on many individual opinions, for such I would talk it as not reliable sources. (3) WP:DEPTH - Is more about an event and not for person - but he passes Military history/Notability guide#2 as a U.S Army general as per the content above. Cassiopeia talk 06:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)


10.

Martina Hingis is a Swiss former professional tennis player.[1] She won five Grand Slam singles titles.[2] Hingis was one of the highest-paid female athletes in 2000.[3] She retired in November 2007 after being hampered by a hip injury for several months and testing positive for a metabolite of cocaine during that year's Wimbledon Championships,[4] which led to a two-year suspension from the sport.[5]

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.instagram.com/martinahingis80/ No The source is not independent of the subject. No Instagram falls under WP:USERGENERATED content. Yes The source provides significant coverage into the subject. ✘ No
https://www.latimes.com/sports/more/la-sp-us-open-hingis-20170910-story.html Yes The source is independent of the subject. Yes WP:LATIMES is reliable per WP:RSP. Yes The source provides significant coverage into the subject. ✔ Yes
[3] Yes The source is independent. Yes Reliable. No Doesn't provide significant coverage since the source only mentioned about the subject in single sentence. ✘ No
https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/21171438/tennis-another-twist-bizarre-career-martina-hingis Yes Independent of the subject. Yes Reliable per RSP. Yes Source provides significant coverage. ✔ Yes
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2007/nov/01/tennis Yes Independent. Yes Reliable per RSP. Yes Does provide significant coverage. ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "Martina Hingis (@martinahingis80) • Instagram photos and videos". www.instagram.com. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  2. ^ "Martina Hingis wins her 25th Grand Slam championship, the women's doubles crown at the U.S. Open". Los Angeles Times. 2017-09-11. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  3. ^ a b Paul Fein (30 January 2003). Tennis Confidential: Today's Greatest Players, Matches, and Controversies. Potomac Books, Inc. pp. 197–. ISBN 978-1-57488-526-2.
  4. ^ "Done again? Why Martina Hingis decided to retire for a third time". ESPN.com. 2017-10-26. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  5. ^ Staff; agencies (2007-11-01). "Tennis: Martina Hingis retires amid cocaine controversy". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
11. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Subject meets WP:NTENNIS#3 since they've won five Grand Slam tournaments. WikiLinuz (talk) 21:30, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY Instagram is not independent nor reliable source. Subject pass WP:NTENNIS SSN (sport specific notability) - Full content from the article Martina Hingis would pass all the WP:NTENNIS criteria. Cassiopeia talk 06:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)



Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" or "?" for no after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".
12.
Fallingwater, Mill Run, Pennsylvania (1937)

Frank Lloyd Wright (June 8, 1867 – April 9, 1959) was an American architect, interior designer, writer, and educator. Wright believed in designing structures that were in harmony with humanity and its environment, a philosophy he called organic architecture. His creative period spanned more than 70 years. He works includes The Guggenheim, swirling, snail-shaped museum in the middle of Manhattan.[1][2] Fallingwater, which has been called "the best all-time work of American architecture."[3] This is one of Wright's most famous private residences (completed 1937), was built for Mr. and Mrs. Edgar J. Kaufmann, Sr., at Mill Run, Pennsylvania. Constructed over a 30-foot waterfall, it was designed according to Wright's desire to place the occupants close to the natural surroundings. The house was intended to be more of a family getaway, rather than a live-in home.[4]


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://nypost.com/2017/06/07/frank-lloyd-wright-was-a-house-builder-and-homewrecker/ Yes Source is independent of the subject. No WP:NYPOST is not reliable per consensus. Yes Provides significant coverage. ✘ No
https://franklloydwright.org/work/ No Not independent of the subject. No self-published doesn't pillar notability. Yes Provides significant coverage. ✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20080302053743/http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jul2004/nf20040728_3153_db078.htm Yes Independent of the subject. Yes Reliable per RSP. Yes Provides significant coverage. ✔ Yes
https://books.google.com/books?id=KSA1HTTU-eMC Yes Independent of subject. Yes Published by reliable publishing house. Yes Provides significant coverage. ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ Hoffman, Barbara (2017-06-07). "Famed architect Frank Lloyd Wright had a dark side". New York Post. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  2. ^ "Frank Lloyd Wright's Work". Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  3. ^ "BW Online | July 28, 2004 | Frank Lloyd Wright: America's Architect". 2008-03-02. Archived from the original on 2008-03-02. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  4. ^ Robert C. Twombly (24 April 1987). Frank Lloyd Wright: His Life and His Architecture. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-85797-6.


13. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Meets WP:ARCHITECT#4 since their work had critical reception and The Guggenheim work is represented in notable galleries, whose work is also portrayed as the best all-time. WikiLinuz (talk) 21:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. Subject passes WP:ARCHITECT – criteria 1, 3 and 4. Full content from the article of Frank Lloyd Wright, he would pass all the all (1-4) WP:ARCHITECT criteria. Cassiopeia talk 06:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)



14.

Jordan Lennon (born February 22, 2000), is a British film producer and actor. [1] Lennon is currently a member of BAFTA.[2] He continues to work aside 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros, Wicked Wales, Capture Studios, Cineworld, Paramount Pictures, and Rockefeller Foundation.[3]

At age 16, the Vice President of 20th Century Fox, Paul Higginson. Who previously worked on Star Wars, Titanic, and Independence Day took on Jordan and Rowan Snow as a mentor.[4] In December 2018, Jordan and Rowan finished British Film Academy.[5] Jordan lived in Skelmersdale for 10 years before moving to Rhyl, North Wales. He's currently writing 'Stranger in the Night' scrreenplay for Warner Brothers.


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8902348/ No Not independent. No WP:IMDB not reliable per consensus. Yes Provides significant coverage into their work. ✘ No
http://www.bafta.org/wales No Not independent since the subject is a member of BAFTA. Yes Reliable. No Doesn't provide significant covarage. ✘ No
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordan-d-98111a125 No Not independent. No Self-published and not reliable. Yes Provides significant covarege. ✘ No
https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/Jordan-David/ No Not independent since the subject was a member of several projects that the org. produced. No Not reliable. No Doesn't mention the source at all. ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "Jordan D. Lennon". IMDb. Retrieved 2019-01-21.
  2. ^ "BAFTA Cymru". www.bafta.org. 2014-06-16. Retrieved 2019-01-21.
  3. ^ Lennon, Jordan. "LinkedIn Account". LinkedIn. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)
  4. ^ "Jordan David - 2 Character Images". Behind The Voice Actors. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  5. ^ "BFI Film Academy". Tape Community Music & Film. 2016-08-24. Retrieved 2019-01-21.


15. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Fails general notability WP:GNG criteria. Fails WP:MUSICBIO, WP:BASIC and WP:FILMMAKER#3. WikiLinuz (talk) 22:06, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. Subject fails all notability guidelnes. Cassiopeia talk 06:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)


16.
Sonny Bill Williams 2010

Sonny William Williams (born 3 August 1985), who is a Muslim[1], is a New Zealand All blacks rugby union footballer,[2] Williams was a Marist Saints junior when he was spotted playing in Auckland by Bulldogs talent scout John Ackland.[3] In 2002 he was offered a contract and moved to Sydney (as the youngest player to ever sign with an NRL club) to play in the Bulldogs' junior grades.[4]

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7505117/2019-Rugby-World-Cup-Sonny-Bill-Williams-expecting-fourth-child.html Yes Independent of the subject. No WP:DAILYMAIL not reliable per RSP. Yes Provides significant coverage. ✘ No
http://stats.allblacks.com/asp/Profile.asp?ABID=1108 No Not independent since subject is affiliated with allblacks. No Not reliable since self-published. Yes Provides significant coverage. ✘ No
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/warriors-league-team/news/article.cfm?c_id=360&objectid=10399308 Yes Independent. Yes Reliable per RSP. Yes Provides significant coverage. ✔ Yes
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/10/01/1096527943523.html Yes Independent of the subject. Yes Reliable per RSP. Yes Provides significant coverage. ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "2019 Rugby World Cup: Sonny Bill Williams is expecting a fourth child". Mail Online. 2019-09-25. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  2. ^ "Stats | allblacks.com". stats.allblacks.com. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  3. ^ Rattue, Chris (2 September 2006). "Jerome Ropati – Miracle in the making". New Zealand Herald. APN Holdings. Retrieved 10 October 2010.
  4. ^ "The King, Sonny and heir". Sydney Morning Herald. Fairfax. 2 October 2004. Retrieved 12 November 2011.


17. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Meets WP:NRU#1 since he played for All Blacks, a high performance union. WikiLinuz (talk) 22:19, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. nzherald.co.nz is a reliable source but since the article is an interview piece, it makes the source not independent. Subject passes WP:RLN criteria 1, 3. In Full article the subject also passes WP:NBOX criterion 1 and WP:NRU criteria 1, 2. Cassiopeia talk 06:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)



18.


Bryan Adams Guadalajara 2006

"Can't Stop This Thing We Started" is a song by Canadian singer and songwriter Bryan Adams. The song was written by Adams and Robert John "Mutt" Lange, and was the second single from Adams' 1991 album Waking Up the Neighbours where by the song was nominated for Grammy Award 1992 "Song of the Year"[1]


Weekly charts

Chart (1991-1992) Peak
position
US Mainstream Rock (Billboard)[2] 2
Denmark (IFPI)[3] 2
US Billboard Hot 100[4] 2

| class="col-break col-break-2" |

End-of-year charts

End-of-year chart (1991) Position
Canada Top Singles (RPM)[5] 3


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.nytimes.com/1992/01/09/arts/grammy-short-list-many-for-a-few.html Yes Independent of the subject. Yes WP:NYTIMES is reliable. Yes Provides significant coverage. ✔ Yes
https://www.billboard.com/music/Bryan-Adams/chart-history/RTT Yes Independent of the subject. Yes Reliable per consensus. Yes Provides significant coverage. ✔ Yes
https://www.billboard.com/music/Bryan-Adams/chart-history/HSI Yes Independent of the subject. Yes Reliable per consensus. Yes Provides significant coverage. ✔ Yes
https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/films-videos-sound-recordings/rpm/Pages/image.aspx?Image=nlc008388.2024&URLjpg=http%3a%2f%2fwww.collectionscanada.gc.ca%2fobj%2f028020%2ff4%2fnlc008388.2024.gif&Ecopy=nlc008388.2024 Yes Independent of the subject. No Not reliable since government reports are WP:PRIMARY. Yes Provides significant coverage. ✘ No
https://www.musicvf.com/song.php?title=Can%27t+Stop+This+Thing+We+Started+by+Bryan+Adams&id=7272 Yes Independent of the subject. No Not reliable. Yes Provides significant coverage. ✘ No
https://musicchartsarchive.com/singles/bryan-adams/cant-stop-this-thing-we-started Yes Independent of the subject. No Not reliable. Yes Provides significant coverage. ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ Pareles, Jon (1992-01-09). "Grammy Short List: Many For a Few". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-12-28.
  2. ^ "Bryan Adams Chart History (Mainstream Rock)". Billboard.
  3. ^ "Top 10 Denmark" (PDF). Music & Media. Retrieved March 21, 2018.[permanent dead link‍]
  4. ^ "Bryan Adams Chart History (Hot 100)". Billboard.
  5. ^ "RPM 100 Hit Tracks of 1991". RPM. Retrieved November 23, 2017.
19. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Passes WP:NALBUMS#1 and #2. WikiLinuz (talk) 23:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. The original source (RPM 100) of the image (photocopy) from the Candanian gov site is reliable and so are musicvf and musicharsarchieve.com. This article is about a song and not an album so your notability answer is incorrect instead it passes WP:NSONG criterion 1. Cassiopeia talk 06:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)



20.


Kamlesh Bhatt is a Solution Architect and a DevOps Engineer living in Singapore. I am a fan of technology, music, and entrepreneurship. He is interested in photography and travel. He could be reached at his blog and youtube channel.[1][2]


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://medium.com/@kamleshbhatt_ No The source is not independent of the subject. No Source is self-published and is not subjected to fact-checking. No Although Meduim articles may hint about the subject's works/interests/experties, it doesn't provide significient coverage. ✘ No
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kamlesh-bhatt-45392961/ No The source is not independent of the subject. No Source is self-published and is not subjected to fact-checking. Yes Source provides significient coverage about the subject. ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "Kamlesh Bhatt". Medium. Retrieved 2019-12-28.
  2. ^ Bhatt, Kamlesh (December 27, 2019). "Kamlesh Bhatt". Linkedin. Retrieved December 27, 2019.
21. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Doesn't meet WP:ANYBIO basic criteria. (1) Isn't received any award and such; (2) Their contributions aren't published in independent secondary sources; (3) Isn't made it to a biographical dictionary. Also doesn't meet WP:CREATIVE criteria's #1-4 (as a DevOps engineer). WikiLinuz (talk) 06:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 06:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)



WikiLinuz, See assignment 2 above. Note: Pls click "Show" on to see the source tables. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 09:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
@Cassiopeia: Hi, I've submitted my answers to this assignment. Thanks, WikiLinuz (talk) 23:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
WikiLinuz, Sorry for taking a little longer than usual to review the assignment. Pls see the comments above and let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to next assignment. Cassiopeia talk 06:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
@Cassiopeia: No problem! It's cordially appreciated that you're taking your time off Wiki in mentoring me through this. I've reviewed the markings for this assignment; I'm ready to move on to the next one. Thanks, WikiLinuz (talk) 06:35, 6 November 2021 (UTC)



Content Policy

[edit]

Article titles

[edit]
Please read WP:TITLE and answer the questions below


1. Article name "Hannibal Barca" - Does the article name need to be change? and Why? (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Hannibal Barca was a Carthaginian general and statesman who is widely considered one of the greatest military commanders in history. His father, Hamilcar Barca, was a leading Carthaginian commander during the First Punic War (264–241 BC).[1][2][3]

References

  1. ^ Eve MacDonald (24 February 2015). Hannibal: A Hellenistic Life. Yale University Press. pp. 48–. ISBN 978-0-300-21015-6.
  2. ^ John Whitaker; Hannibal (1794). The course of Hannibal over the Alps ascertained. John Stockdale, Piccadilly. pp. 1–.
  3. ^ Patrick N Hunt (11 July 2017). Hannibal. Simon & Schuster. pp. 214–. ISBN 978-1-4391-0977-9.

Answer: Yes. Per WP:COMMONNAME, we're advised to use a title that's commonly used in prominent English-language sources. Thus, the article needs to be renamed "Hannibal". WikiLinuz (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2021 (UTC)



2. Article name "Magic Johnson". Does the article name need to be change? and Why?(please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Earvin "Magic" Johnson Jr. (born August 14, 1959) is an American retired professional basketball player and former president of basketball operations of the Los Angeles Lakers of the National Basketball Association (NBA). He played point guard for the Lakers for 13 seasons.[1][2][3][4]

References

  1. ^ Roselius, J. Chris. (2011). Magic Johnson : basketball star & entrepreneur. Edina, Minn.: ABDO Pub. Co. ISBN 9781617147562. OCLC 663953248.
  2. ^ "Magic Johnson | Biography & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2019-10-23.
  3. ^ Stein, Marc; Deb, Sopan (2019-04-11). "Magic Johnson Always Set His Sights Beyond Basketball". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-10-23.
  4. ^ "Magic Johnson: Michael Jordan said Stephen Curry not Hall of Famer in fear of tampering fine". sports.yahoo.com. Retrieved 2019-10-23.



Answer: No. Prominent English-language sources use "Magic Johnson", thus per WP:COMMONNAME, shouldn't be renamed. WikiLinuz (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)



Biographies of living persons

[edit]
Please read WP:BLP and answer the questions below.
3. As per the texts below, pls explain the if the content is acceptable of inclusive and why. (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Conor Anthony McGregor (born 14 July 1988) is an Irish professional mixed martial artist and boxer. His is a former Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) featherweight and lightweight champion.[1]

On 15 August 2019, TMZ Sports published a video that appeared to show McGregor punching a man at The Marble Arch Pub in Dublin.[2] The incident happened on 6 April and was originally reported by Irish media, although without the video that showed the attack. Irish police stated in April that they had opened an investigation.[3] McGregor was charged with assault and first appeared in court on 11 October 2019.[4][5][6]

In April 2019, McGregor is the father of Terri Murray's son, Clodagh. Murray bedded McGregor in 2017 at his hotel after the Aintree Grand National just four weeks bofore McGregor's girlfriend Dee Devlin gave birth to their son.

References

  1. ^ "The most surprising stories behind Conor McGregor's incredible success". IrishCentral. 13 December 2016. Retrieved 3 September 2017.
  2. ^ "Video of Conor McGregor Punching Old Man in Head in Whiskey Dispute". TMZ. Retrieved 2019-08-22.
  3. ^ Gaydos, Ryan (2019-08-15). "Conor McGregor seen on video punching bar patron in face over whiskey". Fox News. Retrieved 2019-08-22.
  4. ^ "Conor McGregor charged with pub assault, to appear in Dublin court next week". RT International. Retrieved 2019-10-23.
  5. ^ "UFC: McGregor charged with assault for punching elderly man". South China Morning Post. 2019-10-05. Retrieved 2019-10-23.
  6. ^ "McGregor appears in court in assault case". ESPN.com. 2019-10-11. Retrieved 2019-10-23.


Answer: Per WP:BLPRS, the In April 2019, McGregor is the father of Terri Murray's son [...] should be removed since it doesn't include any inline citations. Per WP:BLPCRIME, accusations, investigations and arrests do not amount to a conviction, thus unless convicted, the information should not be included. Also, per WP:BLPREMOVE, we should include high-quality sources as defined by WP:RSP to cite the accusations, and avoid using poor sources. WikiLinuz (talk) 01:18, 29 November 2021 (UTC)



4. As per the texts below, pls explain the if the content is acceptable of inclusive and why. (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Diana Nyad (née Sneed; born August 22, 1949) is an American author, journalist, motivational speaker, and long-distance swimmer who lives in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW in Washington, D.C. and could be contacted at +0-202-456-6213.[1] Nyad gained national attention in 1975 when she swam around Manhattan (28 mi or 45 km) and in 1979 when she swam from North Bimini, The Bahamas, to Juno Beach, Florida (102 mi (164 km)). In 2013, on her fifth attempt and at age 64, she became the first person confirmed to swim from Cuba to Florida without the aid of a shark cage, swimming from Havana to Key West (110 mi or 180 km).[2]

References

  1. ^ Anne-Marie Garcia (September 2, 2013). "Diana Nyad completes Cuba-Florida swim". USA Today.
  2. ^ Alvarez, Lizette (September 2, 2013). "Nyad Completes Cuba-to-Florida Swim". The New York Times.


Answer: No. Per WP:BLPPRIVACY, we shouldn't include the phone number of the subject. The text also violates WP:PROMOTION, and should be written in adherence to WP:NPOV. WikiLinuz (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2021 (UTC)


[edit]
Please read Wikipedia:Image use policy and Wikipedia:Public domain image resources. Please answer the questions below and (1) with explanation based on Wikipedia guidelines and (2) provide the guidelines/links in your answer.


5. Could this image-1 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: Yes. The photo produced by the US Government is public domain.



Answer - link/guideline: Per WP:PDI, US govt. resources.



6. Could this image-2 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: Yes. The website hosts public domain images.



Answer - link/guideline: Per WP:PDI.


7. Could this image-3 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia?

Answer- Explanation: Yes. Commons file can be used.



Answer - link/guideline: Per WP:PDI.


8. Could this image-4 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: No. The images seems to be copyrighted.



Answer - link/guideline: Per WP:NONFREE.

Neutral point of view

[edit]

P;lease read WP:NPOV and MOS:PUFF. Point out the WP:NPOV words/pharses and rewrite the paragraph on Question 9& 10 from a neutral point of view.

9. She is a brilliant boxer with a rare and exceptional beauty. She turned Pro at the age of 19 after winning one amateur fight on December 14, 2013 where she destroyed her opponent in 20 seconds. Her talent and marketability made her a fighter to watch right out the gate and she fought under XXX promotion on her next fight on February 2014.

Answer: She was a boxer who turned into a professional after winning an amateur fight on December 14, 2013, at the age of 19. She also fought against XXX promotion on her next fight in February 2014.



10. He is a popular, acclaimed Bulgarian actor, who loves by all who have watched his films. He was born in Veliko Tarnovo and started working in the film industry since he was at the tender, innocent of the age of 14 and he has featured in 44 films.

Answer: He is a Bulgarian actor, who's born in Veliko Tarnovo and started working in the film industry at the age of 14. He has been featured in 44 films.



11. Please read WP:DUE and in your own words, please explain why it is important to provide balance and due weight content in an article.

Answer: DUE refers to the weightage given in the mainspace article text to a source. DUE weightage of the prominent viewpoint, i.e. a point of view acclaimed within the academic census, should be given in the mainspace article text to avoid violating NPOV. Fringe writing, although published in a reliable source, should be given a lower prominence (or weight) compared to a more prominent viewpoint. To achieve WP:BALANCE, we should include significant viewpoints from both sides by giving DUE weight to both in accordance with their eminence.

No original research

[edit]
Please read WP:OR and WP:NOT and answer the questions below
12. In your own words, why Wikipedia is not a platform to publish original research?

Answer: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and is not a platform to publish their own thoughts or personal feelings about a subject; we stick to reliable sources based on the community consensus about a subject. When someone reads the article text, they should be able to verify the piece of information, which is where citing sources come into the picture. Wikipedia's policies also state that mainspace texts should be verifiable and published under reliable secondary sources which are reputed peer-reviewed and fact-checked; thus, if things needed to be added/removed, we must in adherence to the site's policies.



13. In your own words, please provide one example with explanation when it is appropriate to insert an original research or an opinion in an article.

Answer: Per WP:TRANSCRIPTION, faithfully translating a non-English source into English for usage under English Wikipedia is not considered OR, nor does transcribing a video source into English text for the usage in articles. Examples include translating a German new organization's report on a recent event into English Wikipedia and transcribing a BBC report on a subject.



14. See this video and write the content in the in an article by using the video info as the source.

Answer: Sh. Shady ALsuleiman answered the question regarding dress code restrictions such as wearing jeans or trousers in Islam, which is published by Islam Net; and he answers that Islam demands men and women to wear clothes that are loose-fitting, non-colourful attractive, non-see-through and must be covering de aura.



Verifiability

[edit]
Please read WP:V and answer the questions below
15. If the subject has two sons and it is supported by three independent, reliable sources but in reality he has 3 sons. Could we change the content from "2" sons to "3 sons"? and why?

Answer: No. Unless 'latest' reliable sources say that he indeed has 3 children, we should not include that in Wikipedia, since it goes against OR and verifiability policies on BLP articles.


WikiLinuz See assignment 3 above. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 07:00, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
@Cassiopeia: Hi, sorry for taking longer than expected to complete this assignment. I've left my answers above. Thanks, WikiLinuz (talk) 04:16, 29 November 2021 (UTC
WikiLinuz, It has come to my attention that you had been previously warned on topic banned. And your recent warned of EW edits on Swastik article and eventually got yourself blocked where your first request for unblocked was not accepted for not addressing the issues. Thus, your participant of this program is suspended. You can continue the program 6 months after your last block is lifted and all issues of warnings have been addressed by you. Cassiopeia talk 04:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Cassiopeia/NPPS/WikiLinuz&oldid=1091617032"