User:GameKeeper

No to copyleft

I do not like the copyleft implications of the GFDL and believe simple Public domain licensing to be more free. Any images I upload from now on will bear a Public Domain license. I would welcome any comments on this on my talk page. I cannot see how GFDL can be seen as more free than a license that has less restrictions. Any interesting arguments will be stored here.

my stuff

British Beef Cuts

Taxation in the United Kingdom

British Pork Cuts

American Pork Cuts

British Lamb and mutton Cuts

Warwick Castle Plan

• edit count +more
• another user monitor tool
• hit rate
• User:GameKeeper/useful
• User:GameKeeper/reqphotots
• List of United Kingdom locations
• [1]

Fun/Interesting articles

Jimmy Carter's rabbit Prince Rupert of the Rhine

Sandbox

User:GameKeeper/Sandbox

note

p589 the ants Dorylus wilverthai queen 52mm
Oligomyrmex minor workers 0.75mm Australian Ants: Their Biology and Identification p149
0.75 and 52 millimetres (0.030 and 2.0 in)

AL822/288

Thanks for the clarification re https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Talk:Australopithecus_afarensis#Why_no_distinction_between_AL288_and_AL822.3F_Do_we_think_it.27s_a_typo.3F. I must admit my experience is outside the field of anthropology, but perhaps that's a feature, in terms of Wikipedia's general audience. This issue of Australopithecus and afarensis keeps cropping up in the news, as more research comes out. I also appreciate dave_souza's comment clarifying that 822/288 is not a typo. If this article is confusing for college-educated me, it must be more so for the average person that creationism media targets. Keep up the good work clarifying. SalineBrain (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2010 (UTC)