User talk:76.88.107.122

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (76.88.107.122) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave useful edit summaries

Hi!

It's good practice to always leave a short comment about what work we did in the edit summary (the text entry field just above the Save page and Show preview buttons).

This helps other editors tell at a glance what you have done. Sometimes, without an edit summary, your work may be considered thoughtless or belligerent, and be undone.

Whatever you choose, happy editing! fredgandt 03:13, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of notes on categories

Thanks for your energy and enthusiasm in improving Wikipedia! Two things:

In adding a category to a page, that topic's membership in a category must be supported by the article. For example, if a page doesn't mention that a food is consumed at Christmastime, then there's no grounds to add Category:Christmas food.
A category should be placed in a parent category only if all of its members—and any potential future members—inherently fit in that parent category. For example, with your edit of Category:Animated horror films, not all horror films are fantasy films, so this is not an appropriate parent category.

You can read more about the principles of categories at Wikipedia:Categorization. I hope these pointers will help you make more effective contributions. Thanks for reading this, and happy editing! Ibadibam (talk) 19:25, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are continuing to make edits that don't quite align with the guidelines I mentioned above. Specifically, there seems to be confusion about what a franchise is, and when a holiday category can be added to an article. Please respond if you have any questions. Ibadibam (talk) 18:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're still having trouble with categorization. The name of a category generally describes its members. So Category:Pirates is a category for people who are pirates, while Category:Piracy is for other topics that are related to pirating. You also need to stop adding holiday-related categories to articles that don't mention those holidays. This is the third message I've left about that one.

If you persist in making unhelpful edits like these, despite the effort of several editors to help orient you to the way categorization works on Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please let us be your helpers, and not your enemies. Ibadibam (talk) 20:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to restate these principles again:

For a category to go in another category, everything that's in the first category must also be part of the parent category. Category:Dracula is not a subcategory of Category:Novels by Bram Stoker because not everything in the Dracula category is a novel by Bram Stoker. (see explanation about New York at WP:EPONYMOUS)
The only things that should go into X by franchise categories are articles and categories about franchises. Articles about genres or individual works don't belong in these categories.

Your enthusiasm and eagerness to contribute is great, but please take some time to read the guidelines on categorization so you don't end up wasting time on edits that will be reverted. Ibadibam (talk) 03:03, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised this issue to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § Persistent abuse of categorization by IP. Ibadibam (talk) 21:51, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This report is now archived at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive923#Persistent abuse of categorization by IP. Ibadibam (talk) 19:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! — Andy W. (talk · contrib) 04:55, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Achille Talon

I removed the category Dandy, because i do not think it's appropriate. A narcissist, yes, but a dandy? No. Kleuske (talk) 15:06, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bidirectionality of navboxes

Hello again! When you place a navbox on an article, that article must also appear as a link in that navbox. This concept is called bidirectionality. Ibadibam (talk) 00:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions

You appear to be an eager contributor and the community appreciates your good faith attempts at improving Wikipedia. The Wikipedia:Community is obviously an important aspect of this project and it follows that communication is essential in keeping it safe from harm. When several members of the community leave you multiple messages trying to guide you that is usually a sign that there's a problem, and especially if those messages go ignored! Please review the guidelines Wikipedia:Categorization, Wikipedia:Overcategorization, as well Help:Edit summary. If there's no response or change in editing patterns you may be temporarily blocked from editing in order to prevent disruption. -- œ^™ 13:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Due to no apparent change in editing practices, I have again reported this IP to ANI, at Wikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent unconstructive editing despite warnings (follow-up report). Ibadibam (talk) 19:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for Disruptive editing, No change in editing pattern after many warnings, Persistent addition of improper categories - We can't keep cleaning up your mess!. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. œ^™ 00:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

June 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Persian Gulf campaign of 1809.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 00:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barataria, Louisiana. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 00:39, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. KGirlTrucker87^{talk what I'm been doing} 01:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 21:45, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 19:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. This appears to be a long-term issue that has been an on-going problem. You have been blocked three times for this same behavior. 172.56.38.187 (talk) 04:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Look, competence is required here, and you are failing so far. El_C 00:52, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please take your suggestions on how to improve those various articles to their respective talk pages. If you continue to exhibit this lack of competence, you may sanctioned. El_C 00:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Two Years Before the Mast have been reverted. There is **no** mention of the author as a journalist in their article, so completely wrong to change 'author' to 'journalist'. Then "a movie" does not get an 'are'. Do you even care what you are doing? Shenme (talk) 01:10, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Northern (genre). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. "who ride in his horse with his hoofs of warming heats that turn the cold wind’s breeze into heat." What? Shenme (talk) 01:18, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alien (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars: The Force Awakens ‎. Railfan23 (talk) 00:27, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 01:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in The Mother Hive. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Stop linking common words as you did here. Sundayclose (talk) 00:15, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.