Jump to content

User talk:Eric Jack Nash

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Eric Jack Nash! I'm Celestianpower. I noticed that you were new and/or have yet to receive any messages so I just thought I'd pop in to say "hello". Hello. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it's so big but we won't bite so Be Bold and get what you know down in microchips! If you do make a mistake, that's fine, we'll assume good faith and just correct you: it'll take a few seconds maximum! Here, however, are a few links to get you started:

There are lots of policies and guidelines to get to grips with but they all make your life easier and your stay more fun in the long run. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or add {{helpme}} to your userpage - someone will come very, very quickly to your aid. Please be sure to sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? ;)

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a great time, all the best, sayonara and good luck! --Celestianpower hab 23:00, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

2006 is already linked where is states the release date. The page only needs one link for 2006, one of those needs to be removed. Bignole 18:00, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if it is preferable to link to a general page (i.e. 2006 the year) or to a specific page (i.e. films of 2006). You may need to requisition a help bot for that. Otherwise, since they are going to two separate pages I don't know of a reason to not have both. Bignole 19:57, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Please refer to WP:MOS-L for more information about having too much links in an article.

Internal links

The use of links to other Wikipedia articles, for example, Ant, is encouraged. Use the links for all words and terms that are relevant to the article.

The purpose of internal links is to allow readers to easily and conveniently follow their curiosity or research to other articles. These links should be included where it is most likely that a reader would want to follow them elsewhere — for example, in article introductions, the beginnings of new sections, table cells, and image captions. Generally, where it is likely that a reader may wish to read about another topic, the reader should not have to hunt for a link elsewhere in the page.

On the other hand, do not make too many links. An article may be considered overlinked if any of the following is true: 

   * more than 10% of the words are contained in links;
   * it has more links than lines;
   * a link is repeated in the same article (although there may be case for duplicating an important link that is distant from the previous occurrence);
   * more than 10% of the links are to articles that don't exist; or
   * low added-value items are linked without reason — such as, 1995, 1980s, and 20th century.

This also applies to tables, considered by themselves.

As a general rule, do not put links in the title; however, this may be acceptable with complex titles or verbose leads, such as those concerning multiple concepts.

Thanks

Electrical engineering comments

[edit]

Hi Eric,

Thanks for your comments. I was mindful of building services when revising the article and so the article does actually mention building services (although not in those words) and has done so since August of 2005. Quoting from the article:

However if you feel you can improve the article further please feel free to do so.

Cedars 11:23, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Supernova

[edit]

I wasn't aware that there were two bands by the same name. I dismissed the rewritten article as a hoax. I looked at the pop/punk band's Myspace page, and as far as I can tell they're not a notable band by Wikipedia standards. I'll bring this up on the talk page and see if we can reach an agreement to the band's notability. Jtrost (T | C | #) 20:06, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rock Star: Supernova

[edit]

Just an honest mistake. I was removing a formatting error the same anon introduced, and didn't notice I had removed that paragraph either. I've put it back. Kirjtc2 14:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help in the clean up. I was going back to revisit what I just wrote and it still could use some polishing. But I appreciate your help :) --vi 01:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re:Rock Star - compromise

[edit]

No problem. I'll be there to fix any other problems with the article or related articles. P.S. Go Magni and Josh! :P íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 17:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I like Josh because he's from Manchester, NH. But I like Ryan too, especially after he sang Losing My Religion. That was awesome. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 17:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

[edit]

Check it out. I've been nominated for admin. I hope you vote. Thanx. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 19:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WPWikiProject Musicians

[edit]

Wikipedia is in sore need of a policy on for musician pages, and you have been active in this area before. Therefore, please provide your comments and opinions on the policies there. Thanks in advance!--Esprit15d 19:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

[edit]
Cyclone Catarina
Thank you for voting in my RfA. I would especially like to thank those 18 people that supported me. But I'd also like to thank those that may have not voted for me, but gave me advice to make me a better wikipedian. Once again, I thank you all. Unfortunately, the final result was 18 supporters, 32 opposers, 9 nuetrals, therefore I wasn't promoted to sysop. I hope to see you vote in my next RfA in late 2006, early 2007. Hopefully you'll support me. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 15:18, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

[edit]

You are the spitting image of actor Jason Lee (see?)--Crestville 20:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You made the key mistake of providing a link to your myspace site on your wikipedia profile, and me being the curious cat I am checked it out. It's a complament BTW and you look much better now than you did in that older pic where you looked a little bit like Fred Flintstone.--Crestville 18:29, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quarrymen

[edit]

Can you sort out The Beatles line-ups? The Quarrymen is missing a lot of people.--andreasegde 16:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you familiar with The Beatles line-ups? The rock family tree in The Quarrymen is continued in The Beatles line-ups. If by missing you mean that Ringo Starr isn't listed, then the reason is because he is in the continuation in the other line-up/rock family tree. Maybe we need to note that it is continued there. Otherwise, if you mean something else, then please let me know and I'll try to help. Thanks. --luckymustard 17:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pete Shotton and (the other ones?) were in it. I´ll find the photo and get back to you. I don´t want to touch the editing, because it´s too complicated for an amateur... I´ll be back soon. --andreasegde 18:18, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ahhh... I see now. My point is that as it seems impossible to put the whole Quarrymen line-up on The Beatles line-ups page, is there a way of directing readers to The Quarrymen without putting the line-up on there? "See: The Quarrymen", might be better. At the moment it looks as though McCartney and Harrison were in it right at the beginning. --andreasegde 18:29, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 6, October 2006

[edit]

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
Issue 006 – October 2006

Beatles News
  • The site of the former Casbah Club, operated by Mona Best (mother of Pete) in the basement of her house, and where the nascent Beatles played and rehearsed, has been accorded Grade II Listed status following a recommendation by British Heritage.
Project News
  • Some Project articles are having their Featured Article status reviewed, and the comments are not encouraging. The articles are A Day in the Life and A Hard Day's Night (song). (She Loves You has already had its FA status revoked.) Please participate in the discussion and help improve the articles!
Member News
  • As usual, the self-effacing individuals who contribute to the Project are far too modest to mention any Barnstars or other awards they may have received. Obviously they feel their editing/contributing is reward enough.
Issue of the Month

The lead article of the Project recently lost its FA status, and now some of the other articles are being reviewed. Citations and references within articles are again the major concern. Contributors who have literature (books, magazines, links, etc.) are especially needed to provide the necessary citations. It is not enough for editors to know the facts; they need to be backed up by other sources. All help, both within the articles and the discussion, would be appreciated.

From the Editors

If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 007 – November 2006). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Come back, Kingboyk! The children miss you!

Contributors to this Issue
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 7, November 2006

[edit]

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
Issue 007 – November 2006

Issue of the Month

Again, the issue of the month is inline citations. A Day in the Life, A Hard Day's Night (song), and Get Back have all been defeatured, as they failed to satisfy criterion 1(c) of What is a featured article?, and other song FAs are due for the chopping block. Inline citations are an important aspect of articles—they ensure verifiability and reliability, and they remove original research. Additionally, they give readers the option to read the original source material and view it within context.

Basically:

  1. All direct quotations attributed to Beatles members pooled from interviews need full inline citations.
  2. All critical comments about songs or albums need full inline citations to notable music critics, magazines opinions, or reviews, as opposed to being merely comments by Wikipedians.
  3. Inline citations need: author name, article name, publication date, and name of publication. Such info is still preferable even if quoting from an interview posted upon a website; when this is the case, place the URL link at the end of the citation with the date it was last accessed. (This will help editors retrieve the page using the Wayback Machine, should the link go dead in the future.)
Beatles News
  • The Beatles are due to release a soundtrack album, LOVE, at the end of November, as a companion to their Cirque du Soleil adaptation of the same name. It will feature remastered and remixed versions of their previously released songs, including some new medleys.
  • Paul's getting a divorce. Pain, arguing, and fighting abound.
Project News
  • The Wings tours are really nicely documented now (see Category:Wings tours), but Category:The Beatles tours is almost empty. Kingboyk and the rest of us would love to see (and read) articles on each Beatles tour, including the pre-fame tours of the UK—and the Hamburg trips, of course!
  • The hottest Project page this month has been Paul McCartney, involved in the Featured Article drive, as mentioned above.
Member News
  • Our project members are too modest to report any awards they may have given or received.
From the Editors

Wherever possible, editors should help to trim down on list-like prose within Beatles articles. They should convert list-like sections into fluent, cohesive prose which ties an article's sections together. Lists make articles disjointed, awkward, and difficult to read.

Be sure to take part in the Featured Article drive, and don't forget those inline citations!

If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 008 – December 2006). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Contributors to this Issue
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter Issue 8, December 2006

[edit]

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
Issue 008 – December 2006

Issue of the Month

Wikipedia's standards are improving all the time, with the result that many articles in The Beatles Wikiproject are being nominated for review of their FA and GA status - and many are losing that accolade. It is difficult, with such a large number of articles and the ease with which editors may make changes which are detrimental, to maintain the standard of articles, let alone improve them. As ever, members efforts are both appreciated and needed to keep the Project on course.

Beatles News
  • A Beatles compilation called "Love", featuring tracks remastered by George Martin (with his son Giles), has been released and has made number 1 in Canada.
  • The impending divorce between Paul McCartney and the former Heather Mills continues to make the pages in the tabloid press in the UK.
Project News
  • The hottest Project page this month has been Paul McCartney (see above and below).
Member News
From the Editors

If one is to be mercenary about the subject, it should be noted that Paul McCartney is going to be more noteworthy than usual in the near future as his divorce case comes to court. In that case it is great to note that a small group of Project Members (plus another individual who does not feel compelled to register himself despite important contributions) have worked very hard, and in an atmosphere of good humour, to take the McCartney piece to a succesful Good Article nomination. Perhaps this is the method to use for future articles, a small dedicated team concentrating on one subject at a time. Of course, all members are invited to join any existing group or even go about forming their own. Please note any such action in the Project Log.

If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 009 – January 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Contributors to this Issue
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Wikilogos

[edit]

I thought you might be interested in my proposal for Wikipedia to use logo variations created by members of the wiki community to mark national and international awareness days, Remembrance Days, notable anniversaries, and observance days. Please comment on Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Logo Variations and on my talk page. Thanks! FrummerThanThou 10:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 9, January 2007

[edit]

Hi. You are not receiving The Beatles project newsletter because we believe you are inactive. Click the link in the title, above, to see it. If you want to move yourself back to active, and get copies again, please remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles/Outreach/Newsletter/Inactive and add yourself to Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles/Outreach/Newsletter/Active Thanks for your interest in the project. This is probably the last notice you will receive. ++Larbot - run by User:Lar - t/c 19:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redlink removal on List of text-based MMORPGs

[edit]

Wikipedia is not an Internet directory, nor an indiscriminate collection of information - if we're including games that aren't notable enough to have Wikipedia articles, then the page becomes one or the other of these, depending on whether or not we externally link to them. --McGeddon 11:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know - the redlink issue itself is fairly clear; there's no point making a redlink for a minor MMORPG if the created article would immediately fail notability guidelines and be deleted. Making them into external links would break the "not an Internet directory" guideline - a huge list of unlinked MMORPG titles (with or without descriptions) is possibly encyclopaedic, if it makes a good attempt at being exhaustive, and sheds some light on the subject, but I think it'd have to be an "Internet directory" to some extent, to be at all useful. --McGeddon 21:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

News Time

[edit]

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
Issue 012 – April 2007

Beatles News
  • On Friday 30th March, a deranged fan was held after attempting to force his way into Paul McCartney's mansion. See here for more details.
  • Apple Corps continues to make news, after the recent settlement with Apple Computer over the use of the Apple trademark. On April 10th, the company announced that long-time chief executive Neil Aspinall had stepped down and had been replaced by American Jeff Jones. It was also announced that another long term dispute, this time with EMI over royalties, had been amicably settled prior to Aspinall's departure.[1][2]
Project News
  • The article "Jeff Jones (music industry executive)" suddenly becomes of top importance in the Apple sphere of Beatledom. User:Kingboyk has created a stub on the man, but the article needs urgent beefing up (including basic biographical data such as date and place of birth) and, if possible, a photograph of the new Apple chief executive.
  • With the debate over "the Beatles" vs "The Beatles" continuing to cause ill feeling and a number of resignations from the project from advocates on both sides, Kingboyk attempted to diffuse the situation by blanking the Project Policy page and tagging it as {{historical}}. Although this unilateral action hasn't been reverted as of the time of writing, the reaction was mixed, with two members rejoining the project and others stating their disagreement. With the issue still not resolved, the page was sent to Miscellany for Deletion, for the wider community (and WikiProject The Beatles members) to consider the issue.
Member News
  • The membership list has been trimmed, with inactive members listed seperately to help gauge the status of the project. If you've been incorrectly listed as inactive, please don't be offended - just move yourself back to the main list.
The Rutles: The legendary group who inspired lesser imitators like "The Beatles". WikiWorld, March 2007
From the Editors

This has been a tumultuous month for the project yet again.

We need your input on how the project should work and what it's role should be. And we need to start getting Featured Articles, folks! :)

Next issue

This is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 013 – May 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Contributors to this Issue


Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
BetacommandBot 23:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seinfeld WikiProject Invite

[edit]

Hey there. I couldn't help noticing you appear to be interested in Seinfeld. I am interested in setting up a Seinfeld WikiProject to improve articles related to Seinfeld. At the moment I am just looking for people who are interested in joining. If you are interested in joining, please add your name here or contact me on my talk page. Thankyou, Joelster 06:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for expressing your interest in the Seinfeld WikiProject. Just so you know, the project has been set up and can be found here. You are welcome, but not obligated, to join anytime. Thankyou, Joelster 22:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Seinfeld

[edit]

Thankyou for joining the Seinfeld WikiProject. Here are a few things you can do:

  • Recruit more members. (Try inviting frequent editors to articles to do with Seinfeld; check article history pages).
  • Add this template to all Seinfeld-related articles and this template to their talk pages. (A bot may be able to do this).
  • Assess articles related Seinfeld for class and importance.
  • Or just start improving articles!

It's up to you what you chose to do as a member of the project, in fact you don't have to do anything at all. But in any case, thankyou for joining. Joelster 06:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject The Beatles

[edit]

Your user name is on the “Inactive, or have just popped out for a cup of tea...” list on the Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles page. You can move it back to the “Participants” list if you feel this is not the case. :) -- WikiProject The Beatles 15:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

[edit]

There is an Delta Tau Delta userbox {{Template:User Delta Tau Delta}} that you could use on your page instead of your custom one. Rasamassen (talk) 18:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Seinfeld.

[edit]

Hey Eric. I came to se if you are still interested in this project. Me, Joelster, Inkquill and Gprince007 are hard at work and could use some help. Two questions: Do you still want to do it and why? Respond to me as soon as you can. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 12:32, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redesigning the Seinfeld Project Page

[edit]

Hello Eric Jack Nash. I have been working on redesigning the main page for the Seinfeld WikiProject at this page. So before I went on and changed the main page, I wanted to ask all the members how they felt about it. So could you take a look at it and give any suggestions to improving it at here. Thank You. --Gman124 talk 16:26, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photo consensus discussion

[edit]

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on the matter discussed at the bottom of this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:32, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting your opinion

[edit]

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on a photo in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:56, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photo consensus discussion at Talk:Rick Remender

[edit]

Hi. Can you offer your opinion regarding the Infobox photo discussion here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 19:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again. Sorry to bother you, but another photo (more like a new set of photos) has been found and uploaded, and added to the choices in the discussion. A new issue is which photo those who participated before that photo was added would have favored had they seen it, so I'm requesting that all those who did so view the photo and indicate whether or not their favored photo has changed. Thanks, I really appreciate. Nightscream (talk) 02:12, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox photo consensus discussion

[edit]

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on which photo would be better for the Rebecca Housel Infobox in this discussion? If you are unable to, I understand; you don't have to reply to this message. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 03:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Photo Discussion

[edit]

Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion regarding the better photo for an article Infobox? Thanks, and Happy Holidays. Nightscream (talk) 23:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wil Wheaton photo discussion

[edit]

Hi. Can you offer your opinion in the consensus subthread of this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:16, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox photo discussion

[edit]

Hi again. Happy New Year. Can you offer your opinion on which photo is better for the Infobox here? If you're not able to participate, just disregard this message; you don't have to message me. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Eric Jack Nash. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Eric Jack Nash. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you offer your opinion in this discussion?

[edit]

Hi. In the past you've offered your opinion in choosing photos for the Infobox. Can you offer your neutral opinion in this discussion on a related topic? It may go toward a precedent regarding captions. Thanks, and Happy Holidays. Nightscream (talk) 20:10, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Podcast

[edit]

Someone has a podcast/blog/vlog and they are discussing a person/film/historical event/album/whatever. Is that podcast/blog/vlog a significant element in the history of that person/film/whatever? Probably not. Right now, there are roughly 6.3 million podcasts/blogs/vlogs discussing Star Wars/Donald Trump/Christmas 2018 sales. The are all trivial. - SummerPhDv2.0 20:39, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox photo discussion

[edit]

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on which of two photos is preferable in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:36, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eric_Jack_Nash&oldid=1258258653"