Jump to content

User talk:Gankbank789

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Gankbank789! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 07:09, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Gankbank789! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 08:28, Sunday, January 7, 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Suntooooth. I noticed that you have been adding short descriptions to articles. However, the short descriptions you added are too long to be effective, such as at Confederation of Cologne. The guideline is that short descriptions should ideally be under 40 characters long, and no longer than needed. For more information, see the short description guidelines. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 03:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay thank you for letting me know! I was not aware of that. If you would like I can go and revert those? Gankbank789 (talk) 04:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine, I already changed it to be shorter :] Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 04:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Denmark–Norway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bishopric of Verden. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recommendation of renaissance books

[edit]

Hello, i see your in need Of books that focuses on denmark in the renaissance, so i would like to recommend a couple diffrent books: denmark 1513-1660, the rise and decline of a renaissance monarchy (Paul Douglas lockhart) Frederick II and the protestant cause (Paul Douglas lockhart) denmark-norway as a potential world power in the early 17th century (this is an article) Theres also more, but these give a good overlook. I see however you Are mainly active in medieval danish history, Are you sure you Arent getting the medieval times and renaissance mixed up? Btw i hugely appreciate the work You’ve done for danish history wiki pages Anglosaxonmessiah (talk) 14:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you very much!! My favorite time frame is 1500-1800, specifically 1500-1648. However, I was recently working on an essay on Renaissance Denmark and the Baltic Trade, and I wanted to provide background of Denmark's adventures in the Baltic pre-1500. Unfortunately there wasn't much information about it, so I found some books about it and decided to add some of the information to wikipedia!
Again, thanks for the books! Gankbank789 (talk) 15:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your work here greatly and its lovely to see people cherish scandinavian history that is not just vikings. I am to soon contribute a bit to medieval danish history articles here, since its so messy right now, primarily valdemarian denmark. I hope you keep your interest in scandinavian history! Anglosaxonmessiah (talk) 16:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
high medieval history is great! i will definitely look forward to your articles!
scandinavia is such an interesting region historically. its a shame that in terms of medieval history at least, theres a very england/france centric view of it (in America at least), where different european nations had really unique forms of government, culture, tradition, etc. Gankbank789 (talk) 04:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah honestly. I hope that one day all people Will cherish our history as much as people cherish france’s and england’s history. But yeah, great to see some non scandinavian people like you have realized how great scandinavian history is Anglosaxonmessiah (talk) 17:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I actually have a copy of the first book you provided! It is a very good book, its actually what got me interested in the first place. Gankbank789 (talk) 15:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah its great, i need to finish it someday, but i kind of lost interest in renaissance denmark, im more focused on High medieval denmark as of right now Anglosaxonmessiah (talk) 16:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1573 Polish–Lithuanian royal election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jan Chodkiewicz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Countries and nationalities should generally not be linked, see MOS:OVERLINK - FMSky (talk) 17:24, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for letting me know. Gankbank789 (talk) 17:26, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Meeting of Friedrichsbuhel moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Meeting of Friedrichsbuhel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and It has no context.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creepTalk 21:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]