User talk:GordyB

This user may have left Wikipedia. GordyB has not edited Wikipedia since 4 June 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

April 2009

My apologies. Upon looking at the information, I see now why you were removing the template. I monitor the recent changes, and your removing a large portion of content repeatedly without justifying it in the edit summary appeared suspicious and was reverted. To avoid confusion in the future, may I suggest that you make use of the edit summary? This will ensure that any edits you that make in good faith aren't immediately reverted. Again, sorry for the confusion. (And may I suggest you review Talk page guidelines?) Thanks, Ono (talk) 14:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is nice to see an editor taking an interest in some of the tens of thousands of articles that are all but abandoned. I thank you for your efforts to bring these articles up to date. Thanks, Ono (talk) 15:18, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scots language

Don't sweat it. I'd rather know about any mistakes, no matter how small. But no I don't use a bot. --User:Woohookitty ^{Diamming fool!} 01:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why i edit International RL Players

How can players just be called an Australian player when they havent played for them even when they have what about the other country they are allowed to represent are they just forgotten and the international rl eligibilty rule is a joke hayne can play for fiji one year then play for australia and tonie carrol can play for australia and new zealand so it doesnt matter any way as to what international rl category they are as long as they are able to represent them if they have a grand father/mother or father then they can play for them and i have to edit the international league pages to show how much players can represent the weaker teams for people who dont know much about international league i hope you understand why edit the way i do and hope you let me continue my editing in the future as its only fair to include all the countries they are able to represent under the current eligibility rules.58.165.209.77 (talk) 10:36, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RL players are called Australian even when they haven't represented Australia because they have Australian nationality. Offiah doesn't have a Nigerian passport, wasn't born there, didn't grow up there and didn't play representative sport for them.GordyB (talk) 12:46, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby union in Africa

Thanks for adding cats to this. This was the continent I was least looking forward too (too many damn countries - Asia would be in the same boat, if more Asians played!)

I pinched the idea of rugby union by continent from the RL pages. It's not meant to supersede the "by country" pages, but should hopefully fill a gap, as many RU competitions are transnational.--MacRusgail (talk) 18:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mungoball

I have reverted your blanking of the redirect page. If you wish to see it deleted, take it to WP:AfD. Drmies (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed I will but in the meantime there is no need for an abusive term to have a redirect page.GordyB (talk) 20:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't say I approve of your edit summary; where I'm from that's a bit callous, and very pointy, to say the least. And you're right in the sense that it doesn't redirect to African-Americans, but oh so wrong in all other senses: the term has its own article. Anyway, I saw you took it to AfD and that is the right step. Drmies (talk) 23:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Referring to people as sub-humans because of the sport they play doesn't count as "callous"? Some double standard there. Nigger is significant enough in its own right to warrant an article "mungoball" is not but terms of abuse should certainly not redirect to those that they abuse.GordyB (talk) 12:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion please!

What do you make of this - Rugby Soccer? --MacRusgail (talk) 20:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was unsure whether it was real or not. Maybe someone saw the name "rugby football", and changed it to "soccer" I don't know. Part of the reason for my uncertainty is that some genuinely bizarre hybrids do exist, such as football tennis and chess boxing--MacRusgail (talk) 16:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet Union

Thanks for the edit. I would appreciate any comments on the article... I think currently it talks a bit too much about the political set up, although this is important.

However, I've just come up with a new piece of evidence, which suggests that rugby football was indeed played in Russia as far back as the 1880s (which puts it way before the split, and the 1908 date given). What's more surprising, perhaps, is that it transpires that rugby may predate soccer in the Russian Empire!

I've gone through a book by James Riordan called Sport in the Soviet Union, which was published back in the 1970s. It's turned out to be a real goldmine, and has resolved some of the contradictory information that I had been given in sources elsewhere (such as rugby being banned during a period in which other sources claim it was being played). There isn't a vast amount on rugby union in it, but more than enough to go on, and what's there is more than enough to sort out a few of the issues.--MacRusgail (talk) 16:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--

Thanks for your kind advice. I need to get the Huw Richards information in there, and also I'll try and fill out the story of Llanelli in Moscow which looks an interesting one. It's been hard to track down some of the information - I've even used the National Library of Scotland to source some of it. My philosophy is that while most readers of Wikipedia will head for articles on the 6N, Jonny & Jonah, that they're well served elsewhere (online and off), and that it is difficult (impossible?) for us to improve on them. However, on a subject like this, I think it's quite possible for us to be the best - probably also on Tier 2 nations as well. The article should have stuff in it, which one can't find elsewhere online (at least not in English)

Still, I reckon Soviet rugby must be a big historical "what if?" If the USSR had survived a decade more, and if they had got into the first RWC, then I think we would have seen teams of at least the calibre of Romania. (Probably full of steroids and shamateurs!) Instead they took the huff at SA, which wasn't even in it, and by the time '91 had come around, the USSR was dead. (Which was good in some ways, but a disaster for the game). Unless the old SA etc counts, and pre-WWII Italy and Japan, rugby doesn't seem to thrive in dictatorships. Romania's definitely the odd one out in that regard. --MacRusgail (talk) 14:36, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Sport glossaries

I have nominated Category:Sport glossaries (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Glossaries of sports. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 00:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No objection.GordyB (talk) 10:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Service awards proposal

Hello, GordyB! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards.

If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 07:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rugby league and discussYoundbuckerz (talk) 09:52, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello GordyB! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 41 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Rodney Walker (rugby league) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Reggie Corrigan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ludovic Mercier - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Earl Va'a - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:28, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Irish Rugby flag

You are receiving this message as you previous participated in a Irish rugby flag related discussion (WP:RUIRLFLAG). There are two ongoing discussions which may interest you here and here GnevinAWB (talk) 00:44, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby union at the Summer Olympics GA Sweeps: On Hold

I have reviewed Rugby union at the Summer Olympics for GA Sweeps to determine if it still qualifies as a Good Article. In reviewing the article I have found several issues, which I have detailed here. Since you are a main contributor of the article (determined based on this tool), I figured you would be interested in contributing to further improve the article. Please comment there to help the article maintain its GA status. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:US rugby union teams

Reviewer rights

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 15:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you have a look at this please?

I could do with your input here please - Talk:List of Jews in sports#Rugby--MacRusgail (talk) 11:41, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rugby Forum

Given that The Rugby Forum covers NRL and Super League, it spans both "flavours" of rugby, union and league. Accordingly, it is rightfully in the categories of both, and it rightfully should not be referred to as a "rugby union" site, but generically a "rugby" site. —C.Fred (talk) 20:34, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I too would like to lend my voice to this. While some wording can, and will be looked at, it is not a rugby union only site. One of the owners is primarily a rugby league supporter. The appropriate term would be either just rugby or rugby football. We can then look at which sections pertain more to union or more to league. Rowlan (talk) 09:19, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I also would like to throw my 2 cents in. Stop editing the article for which you have no knowledge of. If you are a rugby league fan then all well and good and it would be welcoming to get you onto the forum but don't edit the article please when you have no idea of the forum. Welshman25 (talk) 09:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your last message, no one has nominated any rugby league players to be inducted into the Hall of Fame at TRF. So your argument is invalid and shows that you have only glanced over the top and not got involved with the members. Its quite rich when people like yourself edit pages that they lack any knowledge of the subject purely for the fact they think they know better and show a good level of arrogance when told better. Welshman25 (talk) 10:28, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Featherstone RUFC

Hi, I notice that you have made contributions to the Featherstone article. The current rugby league club, Featherstone Rovers, wasn't founded until 1902, and appears to have no links to the earlier rugby union (RU) club. However, I have contributed to an article about James "Jimmy" Metcalfe, and I have found details of him playing for Yorkshire (RU) in 1896/7 while playing at Featherstone (RU), would you have any information about the RU club of the 1800s in Featherstone. Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 13:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response, if you could ask at a rugby league forum, that'd be great. Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 10:39, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on adding the detail about Featherstone (Trinity) RUFC, to the Featherstone Rovers article. Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 09:37, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cramlington Rockets

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cramlington Rockets, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cramlingtonrockets.co.uk/index.php?p=custom2.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:25, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for getting around to this article late, there's a bit of a backlog at copyright patrol just now. I've tagged the section as being a close paraphrase of the source. I think that it does need to be rewritten in your own words from scratch, since it's clear that you did follow the source, and it remains very close in parts. Just for an example of where it follows closely, you wrote:

Over the next few years, the club went on to win three other cup competitions and had nine players win county caps. In 2003, with the original under-14 team reaching adulthood, efforts to establish new under-12s and under-11s sides failed, and the club struggled for survival.

where the source says

Over the following years the club went on to win three other cup competitions and saw 9 players compete at representative county level. In 2003, with the original U14 team reaching adulthood, endeavours to establish the new U12’s and U11’s teams failed, and the club battled for existence.

VernoWhitney (talk) 13:57, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Heineken Cup Final up for deletion

If you have any comments please leave here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Heineken Cup Final --Bob (talk) 20:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

York meetup

Hi GordyB. Just to let you know there is a Wikimedia meetup being planned in York for Tuesday. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:25, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost interview

"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Rugby union for an upcoming edition of The Signpost. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, you can find the interview questions here. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. If you have any questions, you can leave a note on my talk page. Have a great day. – SMasters (talk) 02:07, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello GordyB! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Your submission at Articles for creation

Holbeck Rugby Club, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hallows AG (talk) 02:21, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your efforts in correcting/modifying my puny effort - thanks again Alanfromwakefield (talk) 13:30, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. When you recently edited Warrington Wolves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Anderson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. When you recently edited Midlands Rugby League Division One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nottingham Outlaws (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. When you recently edited Medway Dragons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gillingham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. When you recently edited Wigan Warriors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Fairbairn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Salford City Reds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex Murphy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cricket test, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Assimilation and Hot potato (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wigan St Patricks

Nope, I removed the info deliberately - entirely unreferenced, OR, POV... Giant Snowman 20:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If it's a list of all players who played for WSP and then went on to be professional - state that. You also need to start adding references ASAP cos if there's anything unreferenced on there, it's gonna get removed. The irony of your 1RR userbox... Giant Snowman 21:03, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tag it with {{under construction}} then - and why can't you add references at the same time as adding info? That's kinda how you're supposed to edit... Giant Snowman 21:14, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. Giant Snowman 23:04, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Prestatyn and Rhyl Panthers, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Prestatyn and Rhyl Panthers" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 22:35, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cristian Raducanu

Since you're a member of the WikiProject Rugby union, can you please take a look at the article about Romanian player Cristian Raducanu? The person who started has done some bizarre things in the article, who needs a cleanup, and he insist in removing him from the Romanian rugby union players category, claiming the article os overcategorized, but insists in puting him in the People from Leeds and 1987 Rugby World Cup categories, where he is the only player.Mistico (talk) 03:32, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dave Woods (rugby league coach)

The article Dave Woods (rugby league coach) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. j⚛e decker ^talk 04:17, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Iffley Road rugby football ground for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iffley Road rugby football ground is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iffley Road rugby football ground until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You got away with deleting this last time because you didn't bother to tell either of the two rugby Wikiprojects what you were doing. I don't know what your agenda is but you are unlikely to get away with it this time. Any fool can see that it is notable.GordyB (talk) 20:03, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are an experienced editor, so I'm not going to slap a template on your talk page. But I am going to ask you to make very sure that you do not again copy-paste copyright material into Wikipedia. To do so is against policy, for very good reasons that must be obvious to you; it also damages the project because people can spend time working on what has been added, only to find that it has to be deleted down the road. That is my agenda, by the way, since you ask.

You've already been told that the Wikiprojects were notified of the previous PROD; the creator of that copyvio article was also notified. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 01:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, they weren't. This time there have been at least three other people involved after I contacted the three wikipedia projects last night. Last time you got your own way because nobody else knew about it and there were thus no dissenting opinions. Amazing how people bothered to vote this time when they didn't last time. It is also amazing that nobody but you has voted for "delete". And if you bothered to check the facts you'd have noticed that I didn't edit the article last time around so any copy-vio is nothing to do with me.GordyB (talk) 18:26, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Dave Woods (rugby league coach)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Dave Woods (rugby league coach), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/sport/other/features/biginterview/8325172.The_Big_Interview_with_Dave_Woods/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Dave Woods (rugby league coach) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Dave Woods (rugby league coach), in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Dave Woods (rugby league coach) with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Dave Woods (rugby league coach). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Dave Woods (rugby league coach) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Sorry, but this time you do get a template. The first other article of yours I looked at contained copy-pasted material. That's very worrying, and raises concerns about your other edits. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've been editing articles for 11 years and this is the first time that anyone has had a problem with supposedly "copy / pasted" text. Perhaps it's not me with the ethics problem. Oh and and just checked the details - the "copy-vio" is three sentences that are referenced and not reprinted verbatim either.GordyB (talk) 18:29, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Iffley Road

GordyB, can the copy-vio tag be removed or does that require an admin? I've never seen one of those. Also, I've been looking for more sources, I've even tried the Thame Gazette. SW3 5DL (talk) 17:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Joe Grima (Australia)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Joe Grima (Australia). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Joe Grima. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Joe Grima – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. PamD 07:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: London Irish

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as London Irish, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.london-irish.com/ClubHistory, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:London Irish and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, London Irish, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:London Irish with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:London Irish. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:London Irish saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:12, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contributor copyright investigation

After processing the copyright listing at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2014 May 20, where I did confirm copying albeit in small amounts, and confirming that this is an issue you've had flagged before on your talk page, I did a look at your contribution history and unfortunately have verified copyright issues, both with content copied from outside of Wikipedia and from content copied from one Wikipedia page to another without meeting the terms of our license. Accordingly, I have opened Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/GordyB to facilitate review and cleanup of any additional issues. In addition to the one I noted immediately above, I have flagged several more problems already at that page. In order to avoid your being spammed with copyright notices, the CCI process asks that taggers do not place templated notices at your page. Sometimes people will do so from habit and with good intentions. Please feel free to remove them. If you want to keep an eye on issues, you should rather watch your CCI page and its linked subpage.

To be clear, the primary issues here are:

Copying from Wikipedia pages to other Wikipedia pages without attribution. Content on Wikipedia is not public domain, but is liberally licensed for reuse. That reuse, however, requires a minimum attribution standard, among other conditions, which must be met with either a full list of contributors or a link to the original page. Please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia for more about why this attribution is required and how it is supplied.
Copying and closely paraphrasing from other sites. Information taken from other websites and placed on Wikipedia must be written in your own words and structure, unless you are using a brief and clearly marked quotation. Wikipedia:Copy-paste gives a good overview of our approach to copyrighted content, with links to relevant policies and guidelines. There are some verbatim illustrative passages of issues at the CCI page, if you'd like to see an example of the issue. So far, it seems to me that this was more of a problem earlier in your career, although as I noted at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2014 May 20, I did find some continuing copying in recent work. While the issue I addressed there is nowhere near as substantial as those older problems, it does suggest that you may not have realized when notified of the issue three years ago how careful you should be to rewrite material.

If you have any questions about copyright or the CCI, you are welcome to leave them at my talk page. You are also welcome to continue editing, but please be careful moving forward. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck this witch hunt. Suddenly now you have attribute when you move data from one Wikipedia page to another. I've been editing since 2003. There was no such rule in place in 2003 nor was there this paranoia about copyright. Now you want to go through 11 years of contributions. Well good luck with that one. In the meantime many of my articles on rugby clubs' history were copy-pasted by the clubs and stuck on their website. No doubt I'll be the one deemed guilty. The Wikilawyers and deletionists seem to have taken over. Sadly the "don't be a dick" rule seems to have been lost. Seriously the article on close paraphrasing that I was advised to read only had its first draft in 2009, I'd been editing for six years before that, how was I supposed to have read it?GordyB (talk) 22:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GordyB, I'm with you, while looking for references I've found that Wikipedia articles to which I initiated and have been the majority contributor have been cut 'n' paste to external websites, which is fair enough, but I wouldn't take too kindly to it if I was then accused of plagiarism. This seems like self-important bureaucrats creating work to enhance their pompous belief that they in fact indispensable and they have the cheek to ask the WikiProject Rugby league to undertake the donkey work, what a set of cunts. Personally, if I'd been subject to the witch hunt you have, I'd tell Wikipedia and its self-serving bureaucrats fuck right off... and relax. Best Regards DynamoDegsy (talk) 08:41, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but you shouldn't be acting like a victim here GordyB. There may be external websites that have just copied-and-pasted from wikipedia (which is bad for us all), but you have clearly copied-and-pasted from copyright sources. I don't necessarily think it was malicious, but it happened. It can be pretty easy to check, looking at archives from archive.org/web from before the edits for example. In other cases you actually mentioned in the edit summary that you got the material from an external site (which is why I'm not convinced what you've done is malicious -- but regardless, it's still a problem)! For example [1], [2], and [3] from the ARU. In others it was so clear it's not funny -- for example [4] from [5] -- your edit was 2006, but this snapshot [6] was from 2005. The problem is now we can't be sure which of your edits were copyright infringements and which weren't. This sucks for all involved, so please don't get upset -- you should be apologising. -- Shudde ^talk 09:19, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Self-appointed, self-serving, self-important, self, self, self, whether in the real world or virtual, there’s always someone who feel that it’s their right have dominion over others, hiding behind a curtain of rules and regulations that were not democratically agreed upon, and that only the self-appointed, self-serving, self-important can even bother to read. Those who can do; those who can’t appoint themselves as a bureaucrat, standing on the shoulders of others, trying to achieve some semblance of notability in their sad little world by doing others down. DynamoDegsy (talk) 10:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I assume by "rules and regulations that were not democratically agreed upon" you don't include copyright law? What will you say to a lawyer from the BBC or the Australian Rugby Union, or wherever else that asks: "why is our copyrighted material on your website and listed under a CC licence"? Maybe you cant rant to them and see what they say? By the way, I create content ("Those that do"), I don't rip-off other people's as my own. -- Shudde ^talk 11:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Even if you were correct and there is a direct cut ’n’ paste, I doubt whether, e.g. Banglacricket (The home of the Tigers’ cricket) can claim a copyright, even if they stick a © symbol on their website. They’ve had 9-years to complain, so Banglacricket are obviously not as troubled by it as you are. If the BBC or the Australian Rugby Union were to complain about any Wikipedia content, apart from being a public relations disaster for them, all that would happen is an agreement to take down the offending content. 97-articles in 8-years; don’t knock yourself out will you. As an aside you say you “fell into editing rugby related articles years ago”, you haven’t you “fell into editing rugby union related articles years ago”, please correct this error immediately as I don’t want to be associated with the likes of you. DynamoDegsy (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am correct, and it doesn't have to be a direct cut-n'paste (see WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE). The Contributor copyright investigation isn't an injustice, so stop crying about it. It's also up to 990 articles not just the ones he created; they could be deleted, and I'm not happy about it. If you don't care about copyright, you should probably not be editing (being one of the five pillars and all -- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is free content). Sorry mate, but rugby is rugby union pretty much everywhere, including where I'm from. I'll call the sport, or any sport, what I want (especially on my own userpage). But meh, I shouldn't be biting as you're resorting to random attacks now -- get over the investigation, it's trying to address a significant problem, and not some great conspiracy. Time to let it go. -- Shudde ^talk 13:10, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Significant problem" my arse, as you’re so bothered about it why don't you take a couple of months off from article creation and "correct" the situation, I'm sure Wikipedia can manage without the 2-articles you'd have created in that time. DynamoDegsy (talk)

User:GordyB, it is understandable that in the early years you may not have understood the requirement of the license for moving content from one page to another, but Wikipedia's copyright rules have always forbidden stuff like this:

Source	Source text	Text you placed in the article
[7]	The improving quality of fixtures demanded a change in attitude to training and playing as the sixties became the seventies. Under the leadership of the great hooker Ken Kennedy, with the assistance of exceptional players like Mick Molloy and Barry Bresnihan, London Irish became a force to be reckoned with once more. In 1976-77 the Rugby Football Union introduced proper club merit tables and in that season London Irish finished first in the London Division with six wins out of seven.	The improving quality of fixtures demanded a change in attitude to training and playing as the sixties became the seventies. Under the leadership of the great hooker Ken Kennedy, with the assistance of exceptional players like Mick Molloy and Barry Bresnihan, London Irish became a force to be reckoned with once more. In 1976-77 the Rugby Football Union introduced proper club merit tables and in that season London Irish finished first in the London Division with six wins out of seven.

This is just one example. This is not a close paraphrase, although the more recent guideline may help you avoid issues of that sort, which you have also had. This is a direct copy-paste. You put this content on Wikipedia on 9/27/2004. The archived link above shows that they did not copy it from you. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For GordyB's eyes only...

Look at them, just fucking look at them, these fucking bureaucrats love making a drama out of anything. There'll soon be more fucking bureaucrats than editors, and more fucking guidelines than articles. I'm really close to a tipping point with this shower of fucking gobshites. DynamoDegsy (talk) 18:19, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds meetup

Hello! I don't know if you're aware but there is a wikimedia meet up in Leeds this Saturday (14 June) if you're interested. Hopefully you can make it. Regards IJA (talk) 17:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Torfaen Tigers

The article Torfaen Tigers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable 4th division team. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yorkshire Youth Cup

The article Yorkshire Youth Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable amateur youth cup. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 19:56, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yorkshire Youth Cup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yorkshire Youth Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yorkshire Youth Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. J Mo 101 (talk) 23:17, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hull & District Youth League

The article Hull & District Youth League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable youth competition.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 11:00, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chilterns Junior Rugby League

The article Chilterns Junior Rugby League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable youth competition.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 11:27, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of London Junior League

The article London Junior League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable youth competition.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 11:27, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Midlands Junior League

The article Midlands Junior League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable regional youth competition - fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 20:54, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of North East Junior League

The article North East Junior League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable regional youth competition - fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 20:55, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bristol Junior Rugby League

The article Bristol Junior Rugby League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable regional youth competition - fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 20:55, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Welsh Conference Junior League

The article Welsh Conference Junior League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable regional youth competition - fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 21:16, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Welsh Conference Junior League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Welsh Conference Junior League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welsh Conference Junior League until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. J Mo 101 (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Our country

Come to Georgia we have great history,great kings (David The Builder,King Tamar and etc.) and etc. Right now 20% of our country is occupied by Russia,but we missed 40-45% of our old territories. --ჯეო (talk) 15:25, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Harlequins Rugby League

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Harlequins Rugby League a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into London Broncos. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. DA1 (talk) 15:28, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cleveland, England

This is going back to your discussion in 2006. I would like to inform you that Cleveland, England is now geographical and covers the area it should. Cleveland (county) is now its own article. Chocolateediter (talk) 12:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for New Zealand national rugby union team

I have nominated New Zealand national rugby union team for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 02:17, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barnsley Broncos

The article Barnsley Broncos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable amateur club with no significant coverage, fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lezignan 9s

The article Lezignan 9s has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unclear notability; no references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Natg 19 (talk) 18:11, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lezignan 9s for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lezignan 9s is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lezignan 9s until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Natg 19 (talk) 20:46, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yorkshire & Humber Merit League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yorkshire & Humber Merit League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yorkshire & Humber Merit League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

J Mo 101 (talk) 20:22, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of North West Merit League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North West Merit League, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North West Merit League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rugby League Varsity Match for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rugby League Varsity Match, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby League Varsity Match until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rugby League Conference Yorkshire Premier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rugby League Conference Yorkshire Premier, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby League Conference Yorkshire Premier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rugby League Conference Welsh Championship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rugby League Conference Welsh Championship, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby League Conference Welsh Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rugby League Conference North West Premier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rugby League Conference North West Premier, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby League Conference North West Premier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rugby League Conference North West Division for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rugby League Conference North West Division, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby League Conference North West Division until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Midlands Rugby League Division Two for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midlands Rugby League Division Two, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midlands Rugby League Division Two until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Midlands Rugby League Division One for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midlands Rugby League Division One, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midlands Rugby League Division One until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of South West Rugby League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South West Rugby League, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South West Rugby League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of South East Men's League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South East Men's League, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South East Men's League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Midlands Rugby League Premier Division for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midlands Rugby League Premier Division, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midlands Rugby League Premier Division until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Midlands Junior League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midlands Junior League, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midlands Junior League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of East Rugby League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article East Rugby League, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Rugby League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pennine League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pennine League, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pennine League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of North East Rugby League Premier Division for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North East Rugby League Premier Division, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North East Rugby League Premier Division until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hull & District League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hull & District League, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hull & District League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CMS Yorkshire league for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CMS Yorkshire league, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CMS Yorkshire league until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of InterTown Series for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article InterTown Series, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InterTown Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of North East Rugby League Regional Division for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North East Rugby League Regional Division, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North East Rugby League Regional Division until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of History of the Midlands Merit League

The article History of the Midlands Merit League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, non-notable article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LR.127 (talk) 18:35, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]