User talk:JJMC89/Archives/2018/January
This is an archive of past discussions with User:JJMC89. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2024: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2025: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Dalida albums sourcing
Thanks for informations, you are right. I didn't pay notice to those pages which I took as source because I was in progress of editing only the aesthetical look of Dalida albums. I will edit it again by rules, keeping those reliable sources that are already included on the pages of her albums. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DalidaFan (talk • contribs) 13:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Request
Hi, could you please join in these two move discussions – Bhavana (actress) and Robin Hood (2009 film). Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 18:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi
If you find time for it could you take a look at my recent noms at TAFI Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement/Nominations. Would appreciate no matter what !vote as no one is attending the TAFI nom page anymore to give input. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 19:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hi BabbaQ. I'm not involved in TAFI, so I'm not going to comment on the nominations. It looks like your posts have attracted attention though. — JJMC89 05:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Proposed merger of Infobox UK school with Infobox school
Hi, thanks for moving the nominated for merging text to the template page. Couldn't edit the actual template page, and thought it would be ok to put it on the talk page, but thank you. Is there a way to add a similar message to the Infobox school template, so editors can see that a merge proposal is being discussed? Please let me know, thanks :) Steven (Editor) (talk) 22:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Steven (Editor): Done In the future you can make an edit request to have the notification added. — JJMC89 05:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Want to help with some dash moves?
Thanks for your bot moving help in the past. I've now got a list of nearly 1800 articles where I'd like to change hyphen to dash. See list at User:Dicklyon/Houses and discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#Dash fix list. Interested in helping to get this approved and executed? Dicklyon (talk) 06:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Dicklyon: Sure. I'll wait a bit to see how the WT:NRHP discussion goes before I request bot approval. — JJMC89 06:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- It's kind of slow over there. Hopefully someone else will say something, anything. Dicklyon (talk) 16:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
TfD notice on Template:More citations needed
Since you've added the TfD notice to Template:More citations needed, would you (or another admin stalking this page) mind removing the notice now? I've closed the discussion as a SNOW keep. I can't do it myself as I'm neither a template editor or an admin. Thanks. SkyWarrior 04:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Done — JJMC89 04:48, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Paid editing disclosure
hello JJMC89, I see you've tagged talk pages of the articles which I edited for pay. However, Chris Kacher and Pod Children's Charity still have UPE and COI templates, which are now untrue and irrelevant. Could you please remove them? Best, --Pozytyv (talk) 22:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- While {{UPE}} is now incorrect, that doesn't mean the articles comply with Wikipedia's content policies, for which {{COI}} is relevant. Since I have not reviewed the articles, I will not be removing {{COI}}. — JJMC89 03:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Since you have not reviewed the articles, it seems strange that you add COI tag... Best, --Pozytyv (talk) 08:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- That was in place of {{UPE}}. {{COI}} mentions the same concerns without mentioning undisclosed paid editing. — JJMC89 17:10, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Since you have not reviewed the articles, it seems strange that you add COI tag... Best, --Pozytyv (talk) 08:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Change Username
Hello, JJMC89. It seems I don't have either the technical knowledge or the software to change my username. I was wondering if you had the ability to do so, to Hyrcanus776 or something like that. Thank you, Jstewart7339 (talk) 13:08, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hello Jstewart7339. I do not have the ability to change your username. Please see Wikipedia:Changing username for information on changing your username. — JJMC89 17:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
What's a FUR? (Re: WWTV)
Self-explanatory. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:56, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Mvcg66b3r: I probably should have linked it. WP:FUR: Fair use rationale. Even with a FUR, a second logo would fail WP:NFCC#3a. — JJMC89 05:14, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
BrokenRedirectDeleter
I recommend putting a timer on this then to allow someone several minutes to make a redirect. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:34, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- Just create the target before the redirect. Also, that is not my bot. — JJMC89 22:36, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 01:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- I was only there to revert vandalism. — JJMC89 01:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Propriety inquiry
Was it appropriate for QasimKusainov001 (talk · contribs) to again move User:Fourthords/Corey Maison to Corey Maison after (a) you reverted them once before, and (b) the article (as it's been reverted to reflect) was previously deleted under WP:CSD#A7 by DGG (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)? — fourthords | =Λ= | 19:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Fourthords: I've reverted them again and warned them for disruptive editing. The article needs to be improved before returning it to mainspace or it risks deletion, again. If I had to guess, QasimKusainov001 is likely a sock of Оразбаев Касымбек. — JJMC89 19:28, 31 January 2018 (UTC)