User talk:Lidaz

Welcome!

Hello, Lidaz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 04:47, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from The Voice of Peace (marathon), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 21:43, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article The Voice of Peace (marathon) important. The Voice of Peace is a charitable marathon in Ukraine that unites media, business, artists and public figures in volunteer movement helping volunteer battalions and refugees.Please do not delete this article.--Lidaz (talk) 05:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Voice of Peace (marathon)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Voice of Peace (marathon) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Максим Підліснюк (talk) 08:08, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This page is very interesting.The Voice of Peace is a charitable marathon in Ukraine that unites media, business, artists and public figures in volunteer movement helping volunteer battalions and refugees. Russians are fighting against Ukraine removed the previous page.The usertalk works in Russian, and wants to delete a page of Ukrainian volunteers.I beg you not to remove the page.--Lidaz (talk) 17:59, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

This edit is not encyclopedic, because wikipedia can't contain the opinion of every people in the world. Opinion of many organizations are present in the voice because are relevant, the opinion of a simple attorney is not. regards. Lenore (talk) 10:43, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On Eugenia Tymoshenko

Hello. I'd like to discuss with you on the article pertaining to her. When I made that edit, I would like to clarify that I was not contesting the nature of the references, nor did I mean to take away anything from the article's content. All I tried was to fix the language so it could be easier to read as well as to make it known to people browsing the article that it could use more edits to clean up the style and tone of its writing. Therefore, I do not understand why you accuse me of "distorting information" when all I'm doing is fixing grammatical errors and making sure the prose of the article is fluid and understandable. I'm putting this in your talk page because I would like to avoid the hassle of an edit war with the hope of fostering a better understanding and agree on amiable terms. However, the next time you think about reverting someone's edits without taking into consideration the intent, kindly remember to inform them beforehand so that it can be talked about, otherwise things get complicated. Thank you. - Crystal Clarity (talk) 06:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:22, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fut.Perf. do not distort the information on the page Yulia Tymoshenko. Do not remove the source and templates--Lidaz (talk) 19:32, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Italic text[reply]

As I warned you earlier, I have reported you at WP:AE, where you will probably be banned from the topic area. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:43, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fut.Perf. do not break the rules of Wikipedia!!!--Lidaz (talk) 19:46, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I've also reported you at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lidaz. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 08:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DMacks, You participated in the group vandalism, You removed the information with a link.--Lidaz (talk) 08:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You'll want to read WP:VANDALISM before you keep mis-using that term. You'll probably have some time away from eding to do so shortly. DMacks (talk) 08:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to wrongly delete the information on the page Tymoshenko. I think admins will block Your actions in the near future.--Lidaz (talk) 08:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia

re Association of international and national public organizations “Social protection” and your message to me.

See the top of every edit box on Wikipedia page that says " Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone—"

Please review the edit history as each edit I made is accompanied by an edit summary explaining which of Wikipedia's terms and conditions I was following as i made each edit. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You should also probably read

WP:NOTWEBHOST : Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a free webhost for organizations
As an encyclopedia, we cover what third parties , have published about the subject in reliable sources with reputations for fact checking, editorial oversight, and not being merely press release regurgitations
The particular subject of the article must have specifically been the subject of third party commentary, discussion and note.
presenting and linking to sites outside of Wikipedia have very limited use.
the websites of the subject of the article have very limited use, both in what types of claims are acceptably sources from their webpages and in how much of the article content is based on their own claims rather than what third parties have written about them.

-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:40, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia content will NEVER include the "our studies" language. In addition, that content is out of scope of the article which is about the Association. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:19, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Child.ua for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Child.ua is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Child.ua until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DreamlarT (talk) 12:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]