User talk:Lk95/Archive 1

June 2015

Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Charlie Puth— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flyer22 (talk) 10:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Silentó page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Citing Hung Medien using accents

Earlier, you edited Runnin' (Lose It All) and added the singlechart template for Switzerland, either ignoring or not seeing the message left there reminding users that citing said template if a song title or artist name has an accent in it, it will not work. I remember you did this on the Bad Magic article a few weeks back too. Given the timespan of your edits, you're clearly in some kind of hurry, but please remember in future that you have to manually cite the website in these cases (i.e. using Template:Cite web). Thank you. Ss 112 16:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use manual referencing

Please start using Template:cite web within reference tags instead of using the albumchart template which has NOT updated instead of copypasting the URL into your edit summary or I will or another editor will revert you. It's not difficult and you've already been warned. Ss 112 09:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Lk95, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Pharrell Williams discography has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Iknow23 (talk) 00:09, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, I'm Iknow23. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pharrell Williams discography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. In Discography tables, singles, albums articles, etc...Verifiable sources MUST be visible on the article page. "Cite your sources: <ref></ref>". Readers cannot be expected to have to review an article's ENTIRE edit summary OR hidden comments within the article for possible references. Thus, don't forget to provide an INDIVIDUAL source if the column header source doesn't support your update. ALSO FOR CERTIFICATION CLAIMS. Iknow23 (talk) 00:24, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mýa discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Iknow23 (talk) 10:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Same Old Love ‎. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Do not change sourced material unless you provide an updated verifiable source visible on the article page. "Cite your sources: Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).". Iknow23 (talk) 05:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Selena Gomez discography.
Do not change sourced material unless you provide an updated verifiable source visible on the article page. "Cite your sources: <ref></ref>". Iknow23 (talk) 05:17, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

German peaks

In future, adding URLs to your edit summaries and commenting out every source you use isn't sufficient enough sourcing. You have now gotten around to adding the German peaks and quite frankly, it's annoying to see that you think copypasting a URL in your edit summary is enough. Cite the URL in ref tags manually, as Iknow23 suggested. Ss 112 16:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I noticed that too after a short while so I changed it by adding the URL to the peaks. I don't think this message is necessary, as I've already fixed that about two hours ago but thank you anyway. -- Lk95 18:27, 6 November 2015 (CEST)

You are still commenting out references when you've already been warned. Do not copy and paste a URL between . Nobody can see that and it's lazy. Copypaste the URL between visible ref tags: <ref></ref>. You know how to do this because you've done it before. That also goes for adding chart positions in wikitables. Use manual markup (i.e. ! scope="row"| US Billboard 200<ref></ref>). Thank you. Ss 112 01:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 15 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Love Song (Sara Bareilles song) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Edit jumping"

I really am not meaning to come onto your talk page and make baseless accusations about your editing habits, so bear with me. I understand that we both follow several countries' charts at the times they are released and update Wikipedia with that information. Generally I'm fine with this because we're both ultimately contributing to the same project. But earlier, with the Swiss peaks--and this has happened before, which is why I am saying it now--it has really apppeared as if you have too quickly jumped to the place I was up to editing to have actually checked every artist's discography and song pages to see if they have been changed yet.

So if what you are doing is checking my contributions page to see where I'm up to in order to jump in ahead of me and update things first, I really would advise you to stop as this is against Wikipedia guidelines (to doggedly follow an editor's edits and either excessively contest or interfere with their editing in some way). If this isn't the case, I apologise but this has happened several times after I have checked the edit history of a page, more than enough to seem like mere coincidence. Thank you. Ss 112 16:40, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I genuinely had never checked your contributions list before. I always try to update Swiss peaks on the German version of wikipedia first and subsequently update peak positions on the English version. So if you or another user have already beat me to it, there's of course no need for me to perform changes anymore but if you hadn't already I'll go ahead and update them. I don't see the issue here. I'm not stalking your contributions site, if that's what you mean? And I check any new position with utmost care before I update them on here. -- Lk95 19:43, 20 December 2015 (CET)