User talk:PepeBonus
Index
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Yoasobi
[edit]Hello! Thank you for clarifying the essence of my mistake. I didn’t know that the genre in the template does not require sources if they are already indicated in the body of the article, so I want to apologize for that! In this case, as far as I understand, adding the rock genre to the template is also not needed, since the thematic section already mentions rock in their sound? Solaire the knight (talk) 19:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- I think that "J-pop" covers all Yoasobi's music style for now. PepeBonus (talk) 20:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- No problem. From what I can see, you're making a huge contribution to the article right now, so I trust your perspective. Solaire the knight (talk) 20:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Oricon Combined Charts
[edit]Hello. Sorry for the inconvenience. I saw that you are a Japanese chart watcher. Would you like to express your opinion in this discussion that I opened? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Oricon#Oricon_Combined_Charts
Sorry again. Whether you accept it or not, I wish you a good evening. Simone Jackson (talk) 22:51, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Swedish charts
[edit]The Swedish charts were being added by me in the exact same time, even the exact minute, that you took it upon yourself to randomly add a peak to Katy Perry's album article that I would have gotten to a mere moment later. You do not need to add the charts that I do every week. Thank you. Ss112 13:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I understand. PepeBonus (talk) 15:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Request for Input on Using "Bang Chan" Throughout the Article
[edit]Hi,
I hope you're doing well. I'm currently involved in a discussion on the talk page of Bang Chan, under the topic "Weird comment about name," regarding the consistent use of "Bang Chan" throughout his article, rather than reverting to just "Bang" after the initial mention. While one editor prefers to use "Bang" for subsequent references, others are fine with keeping "Bang Chan" throughout the article, as is common in similar cases. I’ve noticed that there are other articles, such as Gong Yoo, Megan Thee Stallion, and Lee Know, where the two-word name is consistently used throughout without reverting to the surname. Additionally, according to MOS:BIOEXCEPT, we are allowed to use a two-word name if the person is widely known by it, or if they have clearly declared and consistently used this as their preferred style. In this case, an overwhelming majority of reliable sources also follow this format for "Bang Chan."
Since you have experience in similar projects, I believe your input would greatly help in reaching a consensus. If you have the time, can I ping you there, could you kindly share your opinion on this matter? Your perspective would be very valuable to the discussion.
Thank you so much for your time, and I look forward to hearing your thoughts!
Best regards RDWolfgang (talk) 07:48, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Biri-Biri
[edit]I've noticed you've worked a lot on articles pertaining to Yoasobi, so I figured I'd shoot you a message about this. I'm currently going through some Pokémon-related articles to assess notability, and I've found that Biri-Biri doesn't really seem to have much. There's some decent BTS info at a glance but there's basically no reviews or indication of the song having real-world impact beyond it just existing, and no real indicator it needs to be a split off Pokémon Scarlet and Violet's promotion section. I've searched both in English and Japanese and turned up nothing on both fronts, so I figured I'd ask you about this, since I'm very concerned about this article's notability and felt it best to double check with you since you're far more experienced in this subject area than I am. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 21:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think that "Biri-Biri" is a little bit notable enough as a the artist's song/single (chart performance). There's not much about reviews in Japanese song if it's not popular enough (like "Idol"). I would like to keep all the duo's article about singles. PepeBonus (talk) 06:47, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- @PepeBonus I'm a bit confused on your rationale here. Are you saying it shouldn't be removed because Yoasobi is notable? Notability is not inherited. Biri-Biri needs information on its own to stand as an independently notable subject separate from Yoasobi. What's currently there is too weak to support an article, and if from what I'm gathering from your reply is true, there doesn't seem to be much other coverage. I would prefer Biri-Biri staying separate, hence why I came to you for help on this, but if nothing more exists then we're best off redirecting it. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 11:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for my not good English that may make you confused. I read the article again and I still confirmed that it's notable enough, not inherited from Yoasobi, with composition, MV, etc. contents that now appeared on Pokémon Scarlet and Violet article, though it's not that much. PepeBonus (talk) 13:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- @PepeBonus My main concerns are the fact there's no evidence of a real-world impact. Is there analysis of the song's lyrics? Articles highlighting the song's popularity? There's nothing really showing this impact, and routine information like charting information and live performances are things that are part of many songs, including those considered non-notable in other parts of the wiki. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 14:18, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think if all singles/songs articles need "real-world impact", much of the articles are not notable, maybe? It's not that successful compared to viral songs but It's OK. PepeBonus (talk) 21:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- @PepeBonus I am admittedly not the most familiar with what other articles exist since I'm not too much of a music editor. I'm mostly just speaking for Biri-Biri exclusively here this is the one I have the most familiarity with due to being a Pokémon fan. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 21:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sure that it's OK as a music article, though It's not important much as Pokémon-related article. PepeBonus (talk) 09:15, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- @PepeBonus I am admittedly not the most familiar with what other articles exist since I'm not too much of a music editor. I'm mostly just speaking for Biri-Biri exclusively here this is the one I have the most familiarity with due to being a Pokémon fan. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 21:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think if all singles/songs articles need "real-world impact", much of the articles are not notable, maybe? It's not that successful compared to viral songs but It's OK. PepeBonus (talk) 21:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- @PepeBonus My main concerns are the fact there's no evidence of a real-world impact. Is there analysis of the song's lyrics? Articles highlighting the song's popularity? There's nothing really showing this impact, and routine information like charting information and live performances are things that are part of many songs, including those considered non-notable in other parts of the wiki. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 14:18, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for my not good English that may make you confused. I read the article again and I still confirmed that it's notable enough, not inherited from Yoasobi, with composition, MV, etc. contents that now appeared on Pokémon Scarlet and Violet article, though it's not that much. PepeBonus (talk) 13:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- @PepeBonus I'm a bit confused on your rationale here. Are you saying it shouldn't be removed because Yoasobi is notable? Notability is not inherited. Biri-Biri needs information on its own to stand as an independently notable subject separate from Yoasobi. What's currently there is too weak to support an article, and if from what I'm gathering from your reply is true, there doesn't seem to be much other coverage. I would prefer Biri-Biri staying separate, hence why I came to you for help on this, but if nothing more exists then we're best off redirecting it. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 11:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)