User talk:Rhys1

Кыргыз хандыгы moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Кыргыз хандыгы. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources, it has too many problems of language or grammar and and no categories. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 14:10, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Isabella II of Spain, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. estar8806 (talk) ★ 01:23, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Infante Carlos María Isidro of Spain. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. estar8806 (talk) ★ 01:24, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm --WikiUser1234945--. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Infante Carlos María Isidro of Spain—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 13:56, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at George III, you may be blocked from editing. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:05, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Ferdinand I of the Two Sicilies. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Gozitan Nation into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. You appear to have copied a large piece of text from the article Gozitan Nation into the new article Queen consort of Gozo, without acknowledging the work of all the editors who created that text. PamD 07:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Queen consort of Gozo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Queen consort of Gozo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen consort of Gozo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Celia Homeford (talk) 09:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of King of Gozo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article King of Gozo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King of Gozo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Celia Homeford (talk) 09:15, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kyrgyz Khanate

Hello, Rhys1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kyrgyz Khanate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kyrgyz Khanate

Hello, Rhys1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kyrgyz Khanate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]