Jump to content

User talk:Rknasc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Marxus

[edit]

I'm not an admin. Someone who is an admin and who has blocked Marxux in the past for his clueless behavior is DS (talk). You should contact him/her. RedSpruce (talk) 13:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anastasia

[edit]

I wanted some of the wording left in that you'd taken out with your edit. I copied and pasted your reference back into the article. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 19:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editor assistance

[edit]

A reply has been posted to your request for editor assistance. Pastordavid (talk) 15:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

San Narciso website on Thomas Pynchon page

[edit]

Hi, thanks for your message. The San Narciso site is actually administered by Pomona College and has sections on all of Pynchon's works, his life, etc etc. Its name is misleading and I can see why you removed it, and I agree with your removal and replacement of the links to the other two sites to the pages on the specific novels they deal with. cheers Abaca (talk) 01:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Windows Vista

[edit]

Please refrain from reinserting those statements in the Windows Vista article, I've explained why in the talk page. If you really think it's notable and can justify them I suggest you do so in the software compatibility section of Criticism of Windows Vista article. --112.203.32.160 (talk) 12:09, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Ness Beck

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of John Ness Beck, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://johnnessbeckfoundation.org/John%20Ness%20Beck.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as John Ness Beck, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://johnnessbeckfoundation.org/John%20Ness%20Beck.htm and http://johnnessbeckfoundation.org/Who%20We%20are.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:John Ness Beck saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 12:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We appreciate your contribution, but in order to verify that you have permission to use the material we need you to follow the steps listed at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Following emal sent to en-permissions (at) woikimedia (dot) org

-Here is the copyright permission for using text from:

http://johnnessbeckfoundation.org/

On the John Ness Beck wikipedia page.

I will remove the copyright Issues notice from the page.

Bob Nelson

Original Message --------

Subject: RE: JNB Wikipedia Page Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:36:27 -0400 From: Dave Thomas To: 'Robert K. Nelson'


I agree to CC-BY-SA licensing or dual CC-BY-SA and GFDL licensing of the text on our web pages.

Thank you very much for handling. David L. Thomas

From: Robert K. Nelson Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11:39 AM To: Dave Thomas Subject: Re: JNB Wikipedia Page

Mr. Thomas,

If you want me to take care of the Wikipedia copyright issues, please just reply to this e-mail, stating that that you will license your text that I used on the John Ness Beckpage under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) (CC-BY-SA compatible licenses are also accepted, as, of course, is release into public domain). Please note that this means that 

  1. The text may be freely redistributed and used.
  2. It may be freely modified, and modified versions may also be freely

redistributed and used. 

  3. In all cases, CC-BY-SA requires proper attribution of the author(s).
  4. CC-BY-SA allows commercial re-uses provided such re-use is also under

CC-BY-SA.

Please also note that by granting such a license you do not give up any of your rights to use the text: your are still free to publish the text elsewhere or to license the same text to other parties under any other license.

Wikipedia also requests that you dual-license the text under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts) license as well. This license uses similar ideologies to CC-BY-SA, but is incompatible. Wikipedia's general content is co-licensed, and it is more convenient for our reusers to have material available under both licenses, but it is not essential when importing text from external sites authored by others.

If this is acceptable, please just reply that you agree to CC-BY-SA licensing or dual CC-BY-SA and GFDL licensing of the text on your web pages.

Bob Nelson

Robert K. Nelson wrote:

Mr. Thomas,

I have set up a page at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ness_Beck

Per you approval, I have copied text from your Foundation's web page. Wikipedia will require copyright assignment or placement of the text into the public domain if that text is to remain. For details of how to do this, please see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Donating_copyrighted_materials

In particular, you may want to look at the section entitled "Granting us permission to copy material already online. Thanks,

Bob Nelson Rknasc (talk) 12:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jason Hanson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Carney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Rknasc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rknasc&oldid=750830981"