User talk:Th4n3r

Welcome

Hello, Th4n3r! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! STATic message me! 20:25, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Talkback

Hello, Th4n3r. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/49.244.217.120.
Message added 19:25, 14 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NativeForeigner ^Talk 19:25, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My Style

I'm not sure what the official "name" for my style would be. I draw the line-art with pencil and ink, then I scan in and color the line-art using Adobe Photoshop.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:07, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In Photoshop, I like to try and create textures by using different brushes and filter-work.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:08, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. :) Th4n3r (talk) 19:12, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bayes theorem part of Monty Hall Problem

The sentences and the style which you objected to are removed/corrected. Do you have further comments? Please give specific indications on the Monty Hall problem Talk page if you think there are still issues. Richard Gill (talk) 12:04, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stars and stripes?

I see you awarded me a barnstar!

The trouble is, I think you may have awarded the wrong one. You might have been looking for "carefully researched article" barnstar.

The trouble with being snarky is when you really don't know the subject or background, and there's that awful sound of an "oops". So let's be specific. Perhaps after a 9 year editing background, about 1/2 of that in NPOV page related areas, and having been a core author of our current NPOV policy approach/style itself in the distant past (not an easy page to get consensus on a rewrite), I suddenly decided to go to bat - for a dissolved company that hasn't existed since 2004, in an article that conveys in the clearest possible way, that its important years were those between 1960 and 1996, and in an article that effectively stops coverage after those dates since there wasn't much to say?

I'm not sure your logic, but if it makes you happy then power to you. But maybe consider next time, that

If you don't know about something; and
You weren't involved in any discussion or positive contribution; and
You don't bother to research the something; and
The uninvolved reviewers who did check agree it's appropriate;

then you might want to think how it makes you look, when you try to find a bandwagon and jump on it with snarkiness. It doesn't make you look good at all. It makes you look like someone whose approach to other editors is less, not more, trustworthy and level headed.

I see you have a good few months editing, and a good number of edits. We need good editors, but the next person you BITE may not be experienced and may get upset, and not allow for the error. You might drive people off the project. I'm sure on reflection if your point was serious, you could have said it more seriously and directly to me. Can we have less of this, in future? Thanks. FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 23:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Award

The description of me as a typical American in the award, if correct, would disclose improper personal information. Please comply with Wikipedia terms and conditions regarding user privacy.Patroit22 (talk) 13:39, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not personal information, it's more likely it's a reference to the assumed misspelling of your username as "Patriot" since that's typically associated with America. In any case, you haven't been "outed" as an American, since you haven't admitted to being one. Thanks ツ Jenova 20 ^(email) 14:19, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jenova- Here is an indent for you and your friends. Outed as an American is an abnormal use of this term. The primary us is related to coming out of the closet. Peace.Patroit22 (talk) 00:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I left the e off use.Patroit22 (talk) 00:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to argue with you over the use of the word "outing" Patroit. Some of us have improvements to Wikipedia to make. You might like to try it too rather than crying out for attention at multiple pages. Thanks ツ Jenova 20 ^(email) 10:19, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to improve Wikipedia but seem to be facing bullying barriers.Patroit22 (talk) 12:39, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have set up the barriers by pushing a POV on two articles and then trolling on multiple pages of editors who disagreed with you. If you want to edit, then edit. If you want to push a POV or get on a soapbox then you will find many more barriers appear. Thanks ツ Jenova 20 ^(email) 14:42, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trolling accusations are serious if unfounded . I have only responded and never initiated comments. I do not plan to edit in such a hostile climate and comments such as this are a reason. Please consider using care in giving unsolicited advice to further an obvious POV posting agenda.Patroit22 (talk) 19:08, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

If you make an edit like this again, I'll thank you indefinitely. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:38, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Guiyu is found in China. That is why I reverted you, because you were deleting valid information.--Mr Fink (talk) 17:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you edited my user page?

Hello pal, on September 4th you edited my user page changing my English level from four, to two, and writing in the edit summary "stop lying". I don't have a clue on what you were thinking. I don't know you, and you don't know me, so I don't know how you can know my level in English. I'm going to ask you to refrain from editing my user page, it's rude, unpolite and you don't have any reason to do it, if you like you can edit your own user page. --Dennis6492 (talk) 00:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Th4n3r. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Th4n3r. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Red Caviar

Speedy deletion nomination of Red caviar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Red caviar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Madmoons (talk) 16:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Th4n3r. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]