User talk:TheDarkFever
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, TheDarkFever, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Sodabottle (talk) 07:12, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
February 2012
[edit] Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Tamannaah; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stop adding copyrighted images to wikipedia articles. You are continuing after a warning was issued. If you continue you will be blocked from editing wikipedia Sodabottle (talk) 07:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 14:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Sodabottle (talk) 13:57, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Concerns regarding your editing
[edit]I have reverted the majority of your edits to Vahbbiz Dorabjee as well as several other articles you have recently edited. You added personal information to the article without including a reliable source for verification, which others have warned you about previously. Although your enthusiasm is appreciated, you must include sources when editing biography articles; if you continue to add the unsourced content your account will be blocked in order to provide you the opportunity to read through the various Wikipedia policies regarding sources, BLPs, and verification. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:26, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
March 2012
[edit] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Neethaane En Ponvasantham, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Abhijay What did I do this time? 09:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 05:44, 24 March 2012 (UTC)April 2012
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Tamannaah, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Widefox (talk) 14:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 13
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Samantha Ruth Prabhu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
language scripts
[edit]Not needed anymore. See Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics/Archive_48#Native_languages_in_lead. BollyJeff || talk 14:18, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
The article Therdhal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RichardOSmith (talk) 12:44, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Thulasi Nair for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thulasi Nair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thulasi Nair until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Harsh (talk) 07:36, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Thulasi Nair for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thulasi Nair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thulasi Nair (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:16, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Ways to improve Naanum RowdyDhaan
[edit]Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. TheDarkFever, thanks for creating Naanum RowdyDhaan!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. /
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 15:26, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
[edit] Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Sonarika Bhadoria, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 15:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
April 2014
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Samantha Ruth Prabhu may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- }}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:25, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
April 2014
[edit]Hey, i've seen you undone the websites for Gautham's wiki page, just to let you know that they are approved by Gautham karthik himself and his family. We would not put them there if he didn't want them. He considers the websites as his only way of communicating. Please respect that. Thank you -- (Gauthamrocks) 18:07, 30, April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lakshmi Menon (actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naan Sigappu Manithan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samantha Ruth Prabhu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ai (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, TheDarkFever. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, TheDarkFever. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)