User talk:Zachlp

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Zachlp! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:43, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Drexel Fight Song

The article Drexel Fight Song has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Even in Schueneman's "College Fight Songs: An Annotated Anthology", it only is mentioned in passing on one line.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 11:00, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Drexel Fight Song for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drexel Fight Song is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drexel Fight Song until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 07:47, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Redshirt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2013–14 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2013–14 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zachlp -- Zachlp (talk) 06:12, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2013–14 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team

The article 2013–14 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2013–14 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zachlp -- Zachlp (talk) 21:52, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frantz Massenat, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hamilton, New Jersey and Honor Roll (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically Battle of 33rd Street, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Werieth (talk) 17:48, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drexel Dragons men's lacrosse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colonial Athletic Conference (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daskalakis Athletic Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

32nd St. and Lancaster Ave. Philadelphia Armory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Girl Talk, Goldfinger, Armory, Mike Jones and M.I.A.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Why do we need external links on here for the scores in the 2014–15 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team article? Most season articles like that don't use them. Besides, I am thinking there isn't a reason as to why since how you couldn't explain it in the revert here. Usually it helps to explain why a revert has taken place. If you wanted to use them as a reference, that is a different situation, but not as an external link. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 04:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Again...

Since you don't exactly want to answer my question, it makes me wonder if there isn't a valid reason as to why the external links need to be listed as the score. Per WP:EL, external links should only be listed in the External links section. There is no need to list them in the score as the user can go to the team's homepage or ESPN to see the box score. I'm reverting your edits and until you can answer me, enough to persuade me, then they should not be included. I will post something the talk page, and maybe you'll have enough sense to comment there. I see no reason as to why they should be listed. Also, please do not take ownership of the article. Thanks, Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 00:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question 2

Is there a reason as to why you can't or don't want to answer me about the external links in the 2014–15 Drexel basketball article? By you not answering me on here or my talk page, I feel as if you do not have a valid reason. I do not see anywhere on the CBB template rules that says the URL have to be there. Wikipedia articles need to be kept consistent and by you adding the external links to the article, it isn't consistent. It is also the only season article that uses external links in the score section. IF you can show me exactly where it says that they have to be there, then I might believe you. If you don't want to respond within a couple of days, I will take this to WP:WikiProject College basketball and see what their opinions are. I still do not believe they should be there, main;y per WP:EL and what I've said above. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 23:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Damion Lee

The article Damion Lee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 18:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Damion Lee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Damion Lee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damion Lee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 02:15, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You left a comment on the talk page for Damion Lee. Just so you know that will have no effect on whether or not the article is kept. You need to make your position known at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damion Lee. Please read the links at the top of the edit window there before responding. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 03:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For some unknown reason, you added your comment to the talk page at the AfD discussion. Please just click on the wikilink I just left you above and make your comment there. John from Idegon (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Before you waste any more of your time, I would suggest taking a look at what it is that it takes to have an article on Wikipedia. Start at WP:GNG. For this particular article, another one applies too, that being WP:NCOLLATH. It takes a while to get it, as there are a million and one different rules for what gets kept and what doesn't. One thing for sure is, if several media outlets from different places are talking about the subject in detail, and or there is a detailed discussion of the subject in a book or a respected academic journal, the article will be a keeper. For a college athlete, unless we are talking about a center for UNC or Duke or Indiana, or a QB from Alabama or Notre Dame (as those individuals will undoubtedly get a ton of media coverage), the minimum requirement is being named first team All-American in one of the big lists (think sport's illustrated or USA today or ESPN). Nd please don't take getting your article rejected personally. It happens to almost all newbies! I recommend doing other things, like proofing or reverting vandalism on existing articles for a while til you get the hang of how things work around here. John from Idegon (talk) 05:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Funny that you mention that, I was actually looking for the best way to get involved in proofing vandalism. Can you link me to an article where I could learn more about getting involved in that? Thanks! --Zach Pepsin (talk) 18:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you know about Wikiprojects. They are work groups for different subjects. There are about a thousand of them. The one for vandalism is WP:CVU. There are tutorials, and links to other pages you will need at their page. Knock your socks off! BTW, Teahouse, which you have a link for above, is a great place to ask questions and to learn from the questions others ask. And if you ever have a specific question, you can always ask me at my talk page. If I don't know the answer, I will find someone who does. John from Idegon (talk) 18:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baltimore Catholic League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drexel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wake Forest. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Damion Lee

Hi. The page "Damion Lee" has been moved to "User:Zachlp/Damion Lee per the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damion Lee --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Malcolmxl5: Thank you! Should I leave a redirect on the Damion Lee page? --Zach Pepsin (talk) 16:39, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Zachlp: No, no, that wouldn't be appropriate. Namespace, where articles go, should be kept separate from user space. Just sit on the page until it's ready to move back into namespace. There's no rush. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:45, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CAA regular season

It's a 4-way tie, the CAA says as much right here. The tie breakers only matter for tourney season. Please do not remove these any more. Rikster2 (talk) 01:41, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Rikster2: I would argue that only the team to actually win the regular season post-tiebreakers would be appropriate to give the title of regular season champion. That is the point of tiebreakers, afterall. This could be a good point of discussion for a talk page (not sure which page would be appropriate and who to reach about this).--Zach Pepsin (talk) 20:53, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the league in question says it is a 4-way tie for the regular season championship (which the CAA does here), then there is no need for a discussion. You can bet that the other three programs will rightfully claim a share of the regular season title in their future media guides. You are confusing the need for a conference to determine one top seed in the tournament (because only one team can be in that spot in the bracket) with an outright regular season championship. They are not the same thing. If conference tournaments didn't exist there would be no tie-breakers. Rikster2 (talk) 21:06, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't misunderstand me, if you want to start a discussion at Wikiproject:College Basketball about this you are certainly free to. I'm just trying to tell you that this isn't a particularly unclear issue. There are ties for regular season championships every year and the conferences always treat it this way. Tie-breakers do not eliminate a program earning a share of the regular season title. Rikster2 (talk) 21:24, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Rikster2:No that isn't necessary. Your explanation makes good sense. I was looking at it from a postseason perspective. The way you explained it, it does make sense to award the co-champion title to all the teams qualified.--Zach Pepsin (talk) 21:27, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NCAA final stats

Official NCAA final basketball include the postseason tournament statistics. There are many guys who will be playing in the four major tourneys. I'm not hard over on you adding the tables as long as you commit to keeping the, updated. If you aren't willing to do so, please wait til the season is over before adding them to the NCAA season article. Rikster2 (talk) 20:57, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Rikster2:Those stats are under the "Regular Season" header. So they shouldn't include postseason tournaments, just conference tournaments. --Zach Pepsin (talk) 21:00, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

it is the place the official NCAA stats go, and those include the postseason. Season articles have used this format for YEARS. Please don't make up new rules with no consensus. Rikster2 (talk) 21:08, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conference basketball season pages

Hey, I saw you have been actively editing a college basketball conference season page, so please see this discussion here so we can get a consensus of editors. While this discussion is specifically on the SEC page, it concerns all conferences' pages. Jhn31 (talk) 22:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damion Lee (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damion Lee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 01:10, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment pertaining to new school articles and categories

I began an important issue that will affect the college football, basketball, and baseball projects. You are a regular editor within any or all of these WikiProjects and your input is requested. Please weigh in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College Basketball#University of Texas Rio Grande Valley athletics. Jrcla2 (talk) 01:38, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Temple Owls men's basketball team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big 5. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alumni Gym. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2010–11 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2010–11 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010–11 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 17:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting edits

You need to give an edit summary as to why you reverted. Honestly, I agree with Bsuorangecrush; those are not needed. If a team wasn't ranked at all during a season, it's pointless to have a rankings section. If you don't A) talk with the other user about this and/or B) don't give a reason why they should stay, I'll revert your edits. 🍀 Corkythehornetfan 🍀 18:34, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Corkythehornetfan: Understood. I apologize for the lack of communication. --Zach Pepsin (talk) 02:32, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well

that didn't work out the way I had hoped.

If you see another such instance before I do, could you bring it to my attention, and I'll make the edit?--S Philbrick (Talk) 03:09, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick: Sure thing. A few edits were recently made and are in the correct format, so hopefully it's all sorted out.--Zach Pepsin (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. I didn't get that sense from the response but if that's what's happening, then everything's fine. Don't hesitate to contact me if there's another problem.--S Philbrick (Talk) 13:23, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing UT Martin from CIT

It was listed twice in the participating teams, sorry if i got you upset, someone also posted it under Tennessee Martin --Bearcats Fan (talk) 02:29, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearcats fan: oh wow, can't believe I missed that! I knew I must have missed it somewhere. Not upset at all, thanks for the explanation!--Zach Pepsin (talk) 02:33, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (1905–06 Drexel Blue and Gold men's basketball team) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1905–06 Drexel Blue and Gold men's basketball team, Zachlp!

Wikipedia editor Ubiquity just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

You must have gotten this information from a source. It doesn't need to be on-line to be included as a reference. Let me know if you need help with this.

To reply, leave a comment on Ubiquity's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (1906–07 Drexel Blue and Gold men's basketball team) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1906–07 Drexel Blue and Gold men's basketball team, Zachlp!

Wikipedia editor Ubiquity just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

You must have gotten this information from a source. It doesn't need to be on-line to be included as a reference. Let me know if you need help with this.

To reply, leave a comment on Ubiquity's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zachlp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 1913–14 Drexel Blue and Gold men's basketball team

Hi, I'm Robvanvee. Zachlp, thanks for creating 1913–14 Drexel Blue and Gold men's basketball team!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article has no references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Rob van vee 18:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

206.188.36.139

I noticed you tagged the IP as a suspected sock of Dereks1x ^(permalink). Any thoughts on the unblock request filed by the same IP recently ^(permalink)? --JustBerry (talk) 19:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zachlp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2018–19 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Zachlp, thanks for creating 2018–19 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond to the above? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:54, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Boleyn! Where on CBB pages are there usually sources cited? I'm seeing that many pages of teams across the country have sourced in very varied areas. It's not very standardized. Thanks! --Zachlp (talk) 21:01, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Zachlp. The most important thing is just to have the references in the article, but preferably WP:INLINECITED next to the piece of information which they are the source for. A list of sources at the end is less useful, but still far better than no sources listed. Thanks for looking into this, Boleyn (talk) 21:18, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Drexel

Thanks for starting Drexel Dragons women's basketball

However, the opening sentence of the history section starts "Drexel women's basketball began in 1887..."

This seems unlikely, as 1887 is five years before the women's basketball was played anywhere, four years before the sport was invented in four years before the school was founded.

Before I simply remove that, I'd like to keep as much of this section as can be referenced, so can you tell me where you found the information so I can check to see both the correct inception date and whether any of the other statements in that section can be supported?--S Philbrick (Talk) 21:12, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick: Thanks for pointing that out. It appears that is an error, and I am not sure why I didn't reference it initially. However, it appears I may have gotten that statistic from a media guide. For example, if you search this (https://issuu.com/drexelsid/docs/2009-10_drexel_women_s_basketball_media_guide) guide for "1887" you will find that stat on page 51. Like you said, since 1887 was before basketball was even invented, this seems to be an error in the print. --Zachlp (talk) 21:35, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it does. I'll write to Drexel, and see what is going on.--S Philbrick (Talk) 21:58, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just received a partial response from Drexel, suggesting the possibility that 1887 should really be 1897. However, that's more supposition than documented fact at the moment. The SID has promised to look into it further.--S Philbrick (Talk) 16:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick: Thanks for reaching out to them! That does seem plausible, as the men's team played their first intercollegiate game two years earlier in 1895. I've noticed Drexel's athletic history is less organized and published than other universities, so gathering data from some of the earlier years can be difficult. Hopefully they will be able to confirm. --Zachlp (talk) 14:46, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I got an update, in the form of a photo of the 1900-01 team. They are still researching.S Philbrick (Talk) 19:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1897 Drexel Dragons football team moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1897 Drexel Dragons football team, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 23:52, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1896 Drexel Dragons football team moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1896 Drexel Dragons football team, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:09, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mario the Magnificent for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mario the Magnificent is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario the Magnificent until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. only (talk) 20:04, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1896 Drexel Dragons football team has been accepted

1896 Drexel Dragons football team, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JC7V-talk 02:08, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Zachlp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hello, can you please add your references to 1905 Drexel Dragons football team and all articles you create? Thanks for your help, Boleyn (talk) 14:32, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2020 CAA Women's Basketball Tournament

Hello, Zachlp,

Thanks for creating 2020 CAA Women's Basketball Tournament! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

PLease add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:49, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

TonyBallioni (talk) 18:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2020 CAA Men's Basketball Tournament

Hello, Zachlp,

Thanks for creating 2020 CAA Men's Basketball Tournament! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 14:09, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1970 Middle Atlantic Conference football standings

Template:1970 Middle Atlantic Conference football standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:47, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (2013 CAA Women's Basketball Tournament) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2013 CAA Women's Basketball Tournament.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|PCN02WPS}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 17:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019–20 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019–20 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2019–20 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team has been accepted

2019–20 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 16:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1941 Drexel Tech

You moved the article on the 1941 Drexel Tech team, eliminating "Tech" from the name. My searches of newspaper sources from 1941 indicate that the WP:COMMONNAME was "Drexel Tech". Can you explain your basis for making the move and for doing so without discussion? Cbl62 (talk) 20:04, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The school was known as Drexel Institute of Technology from 1936 to 1969 which was shortened for sports team and otherwise to Drexel Tech. Cbl62 (talk) 20:07, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Examples of coverage from 1941 of the "Drexel Tech" football team: [1], [2], [3], [4]. Cbl62 (talk) 20:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2018–19 Cairns Taipans season

Hello, Zachlp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2018–19 Cairns Taipans season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 08:29, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020–21 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2020–21 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 13:52, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020–21 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team

2020–21 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 14:35, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1901 Drexel Dragons football team moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1901 Drexel Dragons football team, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:57, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1900 Drexel Dragons football team moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1900 Drexel Dragons football team, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1903 Drexel Dragons football team moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1903 Drexel Dragons football team, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1904 Drexel Dragons football team moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1904 Drexel Dragons football team, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021 CAA Women's Basketball Tournament moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2021 CAA Women's Basketball Tournament, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 00:29, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 CAA Women's Basketball Tournament (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Likely will be notable as previous years exist, but is currently insufficiently sourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2021 CAA Women's Basketball Tournament and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2021 CAA Women's Basketball Tournament, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 21:37, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Zachlp:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1903 Drexel Dragons football team

Hello, Zachlp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1903 Drexel Dragons football team, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1904 Drexel Dragons football team

Hello, Zachlp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1904 Drexel Dragons football team, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1904 Drexel Dragons football team (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1904 Drexel Dragons football team and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1904 Drexel Dragons football team, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:29, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1903 Drexel Dragons football team (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1903 Drexel Dragons football team and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1903 Drexel Dragons football team, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:30, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of major college football winless seasons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1960 college football season. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:1904 Drexel Dragons football team

Hello, Zachlp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1904 Drexel Dragons football team".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:1903 Drexel Dragons football team

Hello, Zachlp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1903 Drexel Dragons football team".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:39, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2022–23 Drexel Dragons women's basketball team

Hello, Zachlp,

Thank you for creating 2022–23 Drexel Dragons women's basketball team.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references in order to provide significant coverage for this article. See WP:SIGCOV
References that have scores, lists, order of merit and video do not pass as reliable sources for WP:NSPORT. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - you may wish to read WP:NSPORT ) To meet notability requirements, one more reference with significant coverage will suffice. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:16, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1904 Drexel Dragons football team (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 97198 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet WP:NSEASON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1904 Drexel Dragons football team and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

97198 (talk) 19:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1903 Drexel Dragons football team (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 97198 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet WP:NSEASON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1903 Drexel Dragons football team and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

97198 (talk) 19:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:1904 Drexel Dragons football team

Hello, Zachlp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1904 Drexel Dragons football team".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:1903 Drexel Dragons football team

Hello, Zachlp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1903 Drexel Dragons football team".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:2023 CAA Men's Basketball Championship Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:2023 CAA Men's Basketball Championship Logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2023 CAA Men's Basketball Championship Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2023 CAA Men's Basketball Championship Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023–24 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2023–24 Drexel Dragons men's basketball team, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 in sports in Pennsylvania

A tag has been placed on Category:2024 in sports in Pennsylvania indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"2018–19 Sydney Kings season" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 2018–19 Sydney Kings season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3 § 2018–19 Sydney Kings season until a consensus is reached. A7V2 (talk) 01:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:1904 Drexel Dragons football team

Hello, Zachlp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1904 Drexel Dragons football team".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:1903 Drexel Dragons football team

Hello, Zachlp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1903 Drexel Dragons football team".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:03, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]