Papyrus Amherst 63

(Redirected from Amherst Papyrus 63)

Papyrus Amherst 63 (CoS 1.99[1]) is an ancient Egyptian papyrus from the third century BC containing Aramaic texts in demotic script.[2] The 35 texts date to the eighth and seventh centuries BC.[3] One of these, a version of Psalm 20, provides an "unprecedented" extrabiblical parallel to a text from the Hebrew Bible.[4] It syncretizes abundantly, including the names Anat Yaho and Bethel, and mentions a khnh, a word meaning priestess of Yaho.[5]

Papyrus Amherst 63
Fragment 4 of Papyrus Amherst 63 in the Pierpont Morgan Library
Discovered1896
Luxor, Luxor Governorate, Egypt
Present locationNew York and Michigan, United States

Origin

edit

Amherst 63 was originally a single papyrus scroll with a length of 12 feet (3.7 m), written on both sides.[1] It was created by and for the Jewish diaspora communities in the Egyptian cities of Elephantine and Aswan.[6] The homeland of this community is called or ʾrš in the text, which may be identical with the Rashu of Neo-Assyrian texts, a land between Babylonia and Elam. If this is correct, then the Jewish community behind the papyrus may originally have been deported by the Assyrians to Samaria. Of these groups, the Books of Kings records that they "would venerate the Lord [YHWH] but serve their own gods according to the practices of the nations from which they had been exiled," which is consistent with the polytheism expressed in Amherst 63.[7]

Amherst 63 was probably dictated in the early third century BC by an Aramaic-speaking Jewish priest to an Egyptian scribe with fourth-century training.[8] Some of the text, however, is considerably older and must predate the Assyrian captivity in 722 BC. The compilation, however, probably post-dates 701 BC, when Sennacherib's campaign in the Levant forced many Samarians to take refuge in Aram, leading to the displacement of Hebrew by Aramaic. The last tale on the papyrus refers to the death of Šamaš-šuma-ukin in 648 BC and must have been added after that date if the entire corpus was not put together later.[9] Van der Toorn argues circumstantially it may have been compiled for the inauguration of a renovated temple of Nabu in the city of Palmyra in the seventh century.[10] Holm says there's no use of the name of the city in the text, no evidence at all from Palmyra in the period, and cites "mistakes" and "awkwardness" in the identification, and she disagrees van der Toorn's location-based divisions.[11]

Contents

edit

Amherst 63 contains 434 lines in 23 columns without any clear marks of division.[12] Richard C. Steiner thought it represented an extended liturgy for a New Year's festival.[8] Karel van der Toorn agrees that much of it concerns a New Year's festival, but adds that it was a combination of the "rites of the year" and ḥodeš, "the new moon (festival)."[13] Van der Toorn sees a compilation of about 35 distinct texts grouped into five sections.[14]

  1. The Babylonians
    1. "Magnificat for the Lady of the Sanctuary"
    2. "May the Lady Rear Her Child"
    3. "He Smells as Pleasant as You"
    4. "I Am the Cow"
    5. "Nabu Chooses His Bride"
    6. "The Judge at the Gate"
    7. "A Blessing"
    8. "Kings Saw You and Were Fearful"
    9. "My Gift Is for You on New Year's Day"
  2. The Syrians
    1. "They Put Their Hands in Shackles"
    2. "What the God of Rash Said"
    3. "My Servant, Do Not Fear"
    4. "A Dwelling for Bethel"
    5. "Bethel's Beauty Contest"
    6. "Praying for Rain"
    7. "Hope for the Fugitives"
    8. "Father of the Orphan, Champion of the Widow"
    9. "The Lord of Thunderstorms"
    10. "Dreaming of the City in Rash"
    11. "Prayer against Enemies"
  3. The Samarians
    1. "A Desolate City under Tall Cedars"
    2. "May Yaho Answer Us in Our Troubles"
    3. "Our Banquet Is for You"
    4. "The Host of Heaven Proclaims Your Rule"
  4. In Palmyra
    1. "Lady, Restore Your Sanctuary!"
    2. "A Reign of Everlasting Peace"
    3. "Haddu, Bless Gaddi-El!"
    4. "Evening in the City of Palms"
    5. "Song to the Rising Sun"
    6. "The God Who Answers with Fire"
    7. "Shelter for the Samarians"
    8. "Nanay and Her Lover"
    9. "A Blessing before Bethel"
  5. Appendix
    1. "A Complaint among the Cedars"
    2. "A Tale of Two Brothers"

Three of the texts may be described as psalms. These are "May Yaho Answer Us in Our Troubles" (at col. xii, lines 11–19), "Our Banquet Is for You" (xiii, 1–10) and "The Host of Heaven Proclaims Your Rule" (xiii, 11–17).[15] The first of these is a polytheistic version of Psalm 20 from the Hebrew Bible.[16] Martin Rösel has noted parallels between the second and the biblical Psalm 75.[17]

Mar and Marah

edit

The papyrus often uses the word Mar or feminine Marah. In some Semitic languages, including Aramaic, these words mean lord and lady.[18][19] Van der Toorn thought some Mar references might have been added later by an imagined Aramean editor, since they seemed "burdensome" of the poem.[20]

Excerpt

edit
line 13 sʾhr2ʾ · šʾlʾḥʾ · ṣ3yʾr2ʾk · mnn kʾl · ʾ2ʾr2ʾšʾH wʾmn + ṣ3pʾnʾ ·

Crescent, be a bow in heaven![21]

Subscript numbers indicate same consonant and different sign. Context from different translation:

A Psalm from Bethel (XI.11–19)
May Horus answer us in our troubles;
may Adonai answer us in our troubles.[22]
O crescent (lit., bow) / bowman in heaven, Sahar / shine forth;[23][24]
send your emissary from the temple of Arash,[25]
and from Zephon may Horus help us.[26]

Discovery and decipherment

edit
 
The double divine names Anat-Ya'u and Anat-Bethel are found in Papyrus Amherst and Arthur Cowley's Elephantine.[27]

Amherst 63 was part of a group of twenty papyri discovered in an earthen jar at Thebes late in the 19th century.[28][29] These were the "new papyri" acquired by William Tyssen-Amherst in 1896, after work on cataloguing his collection had already begun. In the published catalogue of 1899, the "new papyri" are allotted a range of numbers. The whole collection of Amherst papyri was later acquired by the Pierpont Morgan Library in New York City, but Amherst 63 did not arrive there until 1947.[30] A few fragments of the same papryus also wound up in the University of Michigan Library (now Michigan-Amherst 43b).[1] It was finally assigned a specific number from the catalogue range by Theodore C. Petersen [es] at that time. It had remained a mystery, because its demotic script did not encode Egyptian, (save some loan words[31]) until Raymond Bowman identified it as Aramaic on the basis of photographs in 1944.[32] As such, it is an example of allography.[33] It was finally deciphered only in the 1980s. Parts were first published in 1983 and the first full edition appeared only in 1997.[34]

Deities

edit

There are abundant syncretisms, equivalencies of deities, at least five consort pairs,[35][36] and some disagreement on how to read the Demotic. For example, Tawny L Holm's updates to scholarship remove Steiner's Osiris (which is typically spelled ˀwsry) and instead find Asherah in the spelling ˀsˀr2ˀ.[37][38]

Another instance of Aramaic in demotic

edit

In 2001, R. C. Steiner called a scorpion spell from Wadi Hammamat "another Aramaic text in demotic script". The scholar who discovered it had earlier dismissed it as "Zauberworte", magical nonsense—as is sometimes interpreted in other artifacts like curse bowls.[39]

Citations

edit
  1. ^ a b c Steiner 1997, p. 309.
  2. ^ van der Toorn 2017, p. 633.
  3. ^ van der Toorn 2019, pp. 84–85.
  4. ^ Kister 2019, p. 426.
  5. ^ Holm 2023.
  6. ^ van der Toorn 2019, p. 2.
  7. ^ Steiner 1997, p. 310, citing 2 Kings 17:33.
  8. ^ a b Steiner 1997, p. 310.
  9. ^ van der Toorn 2019, p. 84.
  10. ^ van der Toorn 2019, p. 86.
  11. ^ Holm 2022, p. 329.
  12. ^ van der Toorn 2019, pp. 64–65.
  13. ^ van der Toorn 2017, p. 639.
  14. ^ van der Toorn 2019, pp. 64–65. The section headings and titles are van der Toorn's, from his edition on pp. 149–187.
  15. ^ Discussed in Rösel 2000 and van der Toorn 2017. The titles are from van der Toorn 2019.
  16. ^ Nims & Steiner 1983.
  17. ^ Rösel 2000, pp. 93–94.
  18. ^ Holm 2021.
  19. ^ Holm 2022, p. 336.
  20. ^ van der Toorn 2017, p. 649
  21. ^ van der Toorn 2017, p. 635
  22. ^ Ps 20:2
  23. ^ 61 The Aramean moon god Śahar may appear in xii 12, but other interpretations of the word in question are possible.
  24. ^ Holm 2022, p. 335.
  25. ^ Ps 20:3
  26. ^ Steiner 1997, p. 318.
  27. ^ Arthur Cowley, Aramaic Papyri of the 5th Century, 1923, page 304
  28. ^ Steiner 2017, pp. 6–7.
  29. ^ van der Toorn 2019, p. 63.
  30. ^ Steiner 2017, pp. 5–8, citing the catalogue of Newberry 1899.
  31. ^ Holm 2022.
  32. ^ Steiner 2017, pp. 5–8, citing Bowman 1944.
  33. ^ TM 56121 at Trismegistos.
  34. ^ van der Toorn 2019, pp. 2–3 and Kister 2019, p. 426 n2, citing Nims & Steiner 1983 and Steiner 1997.
  35. ^ TAD C3.15 VII 6. "for Anathbethel, silver, 12 karsh (TAD). Considering that this is a donation list for the temple of Yaho, it is striking that not only two other deities are named, but that one deity, Anathbethel, receives almost the same amount of silver as Yaho and Eshembethel just over half. Since another document (TAD B7.3:3) mentions a female deity Anathyaho, it makes sense to follow Eduard Sachau, who in 1911 speculated that Anathbethel was the paredra of the god Yaho on Elephantine."
  36. ^ Schipper 2022, p. 227.
  37. ^ "Since all other pairs in this list are male-female, it is probably better to read this name as “Asherah” rather than “Osiris” (contra Steiner/Nims, Text, Translation, and Notes, 23–24), although the former name is typically rendered with /θ/ or /š/ and not /s/ in languages across the Near East (see Wyatt, Asherah, 99–105). One should note, however, that Semitic /θ/ is more often rendered in Egyptian as /s/ than /š/; see Hoch, Semitic Words, 433."
  38. ^ Holm 2022, p. 339.
  39. ^ Steiner, Richard C. (2001). "The Scorpion Spell from Wadi Hammamat: Another Aramaic Text in Demotic Script". Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 60 (4): 259–268. doi:10.1086/468948. ISSN 0022-2968.

Works cited

edit
edit