This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
In mathematics, the annihilator of a subset S of a module over a ring is the ideal formed by the elements of the ring that give always zero when multiplied by each element of S.
Over an integral domain, a module that has a nonzero annihilator is a torsion module, and a finitely generated torsion module has a nonzero annihilator.
The above definition applies also in the case of noncommutative rings, where the left annihilator of a left module is a left ideal, and the right-annihilator, of a right module is a right ideal.
Definitions
editLet R be a ring, and let M be a left R-module. Choose a non-empty subset S of M. The annihilator of S, denoted AnnR(S), is the set of all elements r in R such that, for all s in S, rs = 0.[1] In set notation,
- for all
It is the set of all elements of R that "annihilate" S (the elements for which S is a torsion set). Subsets of right modules may be used as well, after the modification of "sr = 0" in the definition.
The annihilator of a single element x is usually written AnnR(x) instead of AnnR({x}). If the ring R can be understood from the context, the subscript R can be omitted.
Since R is a module over itself, S may be taken to be a subset of R itself, and since R is both a right and a left R-module, the notation must be modified slightly to indicate the left or right side. Usually and or some similar subscript scheme are used to distinguish the left and right annihilators, if necessary.
If M is an R-module and AnnR(M) = 0, then M is called a faithful module.
Properties
editIf S is a subset of a left R-module M, then Ann(S) is a left ideal of R.[2]
If S is a submodule of M, then AnnR(S) is even a two-sided ideal: (ac)s = a(cs) = 0, since cs is another element of S.[3]
If S is a subset of M and N is the submodule of M generated by S, then in general AnnR(N) is a subset of AnnR(S), but they are not necessarily equal. If R is commutative, then the equality holds.
M may be also viewed as an R/AnnR(M)-module using the action . Incidentally, it is not always possible to make an R-module into an R/I-module this way, but if the ideal I is a subset of the annihilator of M, then this action is well-defined. Considered as an R/AnnR(M)-module, M is automatically a faithful module.
For commutative rings
editThroughout this section, let be a commutative ring and a finitely generated -module.
Relation to support
editThe support of a module is defined as
Then, when the module is finitely generated, there is the relation
- ,
where is the set of prime ideals containing the subset.[4]
Short exact sequences
editGiven a short exact sequence of modules,
the support property
together with the relation with the annihilator implies
More specifically, the relations
If the sequence splits then the inequality on the left is always an equality. This holds for arbitrary direct sums of modules, as
Quotient modules and annihilators
editGiven an ideal and let be a finitely generated module, then there is the relation
on the support. Using the relation to support, this gives the relation with the annihilator[6]
Examples
editOver the integers
editOver any finitely generated module is completely classified as the direct sum of its free part with its torsion part from the fundamental theorem of abelian groups. Then the annihilator of a finitely generated module is non-trivial only if it is entirely torsion. This is because
since the only element killing each of the is . For example, the annihilator of is
the ideal generated by . In fact the annihilator of a torsion module
is isomorphic to the ideal generated by their least common multiple, . This shows the annihilators can be easily be classified over the integers.
Over a commutative ring R
editThere is a similar computation that can be done for any finitely presented module over a commutative ring . The definition of finite presentedness of implies there exists an exact sequence, called a presentation, given by
where is in . Writing explicitly as a matrix gives it as
hence has the direct sum decomposition
If each of these ideals is written as
then the ideal given by
presents the annihilator.
Over k[x,y]
editOver the commutative ring for a field , the annihilator of the module
is given by the ideal
Chain conditions on annihilator ideals
editThe lattice of ideals of the form where S is a subset of R is a complete lattice when partially ordered by inclusion. There is interest in studying rings for which this lattice (or its right counterpart) satisfies the ascending chain condition or descending chain condition.
Denote the lattice of left annihilator ideals of R as and the lattice of right annihilator ideals of R as . It is known that satisfies the ascending chain condition if and only if satisfies the descending chain condition, and symmetrically satisfies the ascending chain condition if and only if satisfies the descending chain condition. If either lattice has either of these chain conditions, then R has no infinite pairwise orthogonal sets of idempotents. [7][8]
If R is a ring for which satisfies the A.C.C. and RR has finite uniform dimension, then R is called a left Goldie ring.[8]
Category-theoretic description for commutative rings
editWhen R is commutative and M is an R-module, we may describe AnnR(M) as the kernel of the action map R → EndR(M) determined by the adjunct map of the identity M → M along the Hom-tensor adjunction.
More generally, given a bilinear map of modules , the annihilator of a subset is the set of all elements in that annihilate :
Conversely, given , one can define an annihilator as a subset of .
The annihilator gives a Galois connection between subsets of and , and the associated closure operator is stronger than the span. In particular:
- annihilators are submodules
An important special case is in the presence of a nondegenerate form on a vector space, particularly an inner product: then the annihilator associated to the map is called the orthogonal complement.
Relations to other properties of rings
editGiven a module M over a Noetherian commutative ring R, a prime ideal of R that is an annihilator of a nonzero element of M is called an associated prime of M.
- Annihilators are used to define left Rickart rings and Baer rings.
- The set of (left) zero divisors DS of S can be written as
- (Here we allow zero to be a zero divisor.)
- In particular DR is the set of (left) zero divisors of R taking S = R and R acting on itself as a left R-module.
- When R is commutative and Noetherian, the set is precisely equal to the union of the associated primes of the R-module R.
See also
editNotes
edit- ^ Pierce (1982), p. 23.
- ^ Proof: If a and b both annihilate S, then for each s in S, (a + b)s = as + bs = 0, and for any r in R, (ra)s = r(as) = r0 = 0.
- ^ Pierce (1982), p. 23, Lemma b, item (i).
- ^ "Lemma 10.39.5 (00L2)—The Stacks project". stacks.math.columbia.edu. Retrieved 2020-05-13.
- ^ "Lemma 10.39.9 (00L3)—The Stacks project". stacks.math.columbia.edu. Retrieved 2020-05-13.
- ^ "Lemma 10.39.9 (00L3)—The Stacks project". stacks.math.columbia.edu. Retrieved 2020-05-13.
- ^ Anderson & Fuller 1992, p. 322.
- ^ a b Lam 1999.
References
edit- Anderson, Frank W.; Fuller, Kent R. (1992), Rings and categories of modules, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 13 (2 ed.), New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. x+376, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4418-9, ISBN 0-387-97845-3, MR 1245487
- Israel Nathan Herstein (1968) Noncommutative Rings, Carus Mathematical Monographs #15, Mathematical Association of America, page 3.
- Lam, Tsit Yuen (1999), Lectures on modules and rings, Graduate Texts in Mathematics No. 189, vol. 189, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 228–232, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0525-8, ISBN 978-0-387-98428-5, MR 1653294
- Richard S. Pierce. Associative algebras. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 88, Springer-Verlag, 1982, ISBN 978-0-387-90693-5