Kucana v. Holder

Kucana v. Holder
Kucana v. Holder
	Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 20, 2010
Full case name	Kucana v. Holder
Citations	558 U.S. 233 (more)
Holding
	The statute that makes certain discretionary determinations of the Attorney General immune to judicial review does not allow the Attorney General to declare determinations discretionary and immune to review via regulations.
Court membership
	Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia; Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas; Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer; Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Case opinions
Majority	Ginsberg
Concurrence	Alito
Laws applied
	8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii)

Kucana v. Holder, 558 U.S. 233 (2010), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the statute that makes certain discretionary determinations of the attorney general immune to judicial review does not allow the attorney general to declare determinations discretionary and immune to review via regulations.^[1]^[2]

References

^ Kucana v. Holder, 558 U.S. 233 (2010).
^ "Scope of IIRIRA's jurisdictional bar". SCOTUSblog. 2010-01-20. Retrieved 2024-10-30.

External links

Text of Kucana v. Holder, 558 U.S. 233 (2010) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

[case-1] Kucana v. Holder, 558 U.S. 233 (2010).

[2] "Scope of IIRIRA's jurisdictional bar". SCOTUSblog. 2010-01-20. Retrieved 2024-10-30.

[1]

[2]