Talk:Michael Scanlon

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Don't expand

edit

Expand the main indian gambling scandal page instead. Scanlon is only a player in that one single event.

Challenge

edit

I have an article from 1993 which talks about a Michael Scanlon who is a Washington PR specialist who formerly worked in the Gerald Ford administration - is this Scanlon old enough to be that person? See if anyone can find that info, I'm not getting it through some quick google searches. KWH 13:09, 24 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

This Scanlon is 35, so odds are no. 68.99.206.220 02:16, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

personal life

edit

should there be a section on personal life?

--71.178.199.89 (talk) 04:01, 9 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Michael Scanlon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply