Talk:Anaplasmosis

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2021 and 16 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kaseyfountain.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JHunziker. Peer reviewers: JHunziker.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled

Anaplasmosis, also known as Erlichia Equi, is now extremely common in the northeast and prevalent in pets, such as dogs and cats. Some vets report that almost half of the animals tested have the disease, which can attack the joints. The symptoms are similar to Lymes' disease as is the treatment - a course of Doxycycline. A growing number of vets recommend testing pets for the disease every six months to a year.

This article states that it is about the ruminant disease, which is caused by Anaplasma marginale. While much of the article does seem to refer to that, A. marginale infects RED blood cells. Also, it's not a human disease; therefore, other parts are presumably discussing Anaplasma phagocytophilum, which infects WHITE blood cells and could have infected people (as listed under the notable cases section). Can someone clarify this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.185.101.152 (talk) 23:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Clarification needed

The body of the article discusses infection of RED blood cells, but the lede states it's an infection of WHITE blood cells.Wzrd1 (talk) 18:54, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Is there a reason to state that "The microorganisms...are transmitted...through a number of haematophagous species of ticks?" Are there any non-haematophagous species of ticks? I have searched but, thus far, have not found any. — Trackerwannabe (talk) 21:00, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

The use of "blood parasite" or "parasite" to describe a bacterium is confusing. Someone needs to change the word "parasite". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fliponium (talk • contribs) 00:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anaplasmosis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080618181336/http://www.inspection.gc.ca:80/english/anima/heasan/disemala/anaplasmos/anaplasfse.shtml to http://inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/heasan/disemala/anaplasmos/anaplasfse.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Critique on "Anaplasmosis" page

This page does have some interesting and helpful information but it is lacking a substantial amount of potentially useful information about the disease. It seems as if the 'signs' and 'treatment' sections are most weak in the amount of knowledge they contain; they can definitely be expanded to include much more. The treatment only talks about one most common antibiotic, which is not the only known treatment and the signs only tell of the most basic information that one can find. The 'notable cases' section should have more to it or maybe even be taken out because it does not seem very useful as it is. The sources used are not all primary articles and are mostly from novels and scientific articles, this may be improved by including some university studies and CDC data for the disease. JHunziker (talk) 23:24, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

I have added some content to the "signs and symptoms" and the "treatment" sections. I felt as if these areas could be improved with the information that i added by using information from noteworthy primary scientific articles. I also added a thumbnail picture of the virus so that page-visitors can have an understanding of the visual representation of anaplasmosis. JHunziker (talk) 23:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Abarr005 (talk) 01:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC) Editing JHunziker's post on the signs & symptoms, as well as, the treatment. I actually had came across this article once before he decide to edit it and I do agree with his edits. The "substantial amount of potentially useful information" he mentioned including he did followed by reliable sources. Joe could not find substantial evidence to improve the "notable cases" section and he suggested it get taken out because their is not substantial evidence and enough information to further explain Anaplasmosis. I have reviewed the sources as well and the sources are very reliable. The picture he included as well is a perfect example an illustration of Anaplasmosis. Abarr005 (talk) 01:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC) I moved this from the article page because comments and critiques belong on the article talk page. 137.142.46.35 (talk) 13:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Anaplasmosis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.daff.qld.gov.au/4790_5839.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/heasan/disemala/anaplasmos/anaplasfse.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100509165911/http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/biosec/tooute.shtml to http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/biosec/tooute.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100206035702/http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/biosec/biosece.shtml to http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/biosec/biosece.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Section Added

The section "Morphology" was added to the article. Information about the genetics, cell structure and characteristics were included in this section. Only two species of Anaplasma organisms were included because they are the two main species that cause anaplasmosis. Kaseyfountain (talk) 16:37, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

"Morphology" Section added

The section titles "Morphology" was added to the page. This section included information about characteristics of cell makeup and genetics of two major Anaplasma species. This section could be expanded but I chose to start with information on just the two major species. Kaseyfountain (talk) 16:39, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Edits made

I have been working on this page for a few weeks for a class assignment. I have made a good amount of edits and have added a lot of updated information about Anaplasmosis. I expanded most sections besides the Epidemiology section. There can definitely be more work done on this page but I hope that what I have added is concise and useful! Kaseyfountain (talk) 00:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)