Talk:Chang'e 2

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Successful launch

edit

CNN International just aired the launch, apparently live, from a CCTV feed. So far, so good... so this article needs updating. - Dravecky (talk) 11:04, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Toutatis comment

edit

I saw the recent removal of the unsourced Toutatis claim, and I was about to remove the same claim at 4179 Toutatis, when instead I found and added a cite from a blog. I would normally wait for better confirmation, but maybe editors that can understand Chinese could check the linked sources. There is more at http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?showtopic=3105&pid=185026&st=210&#entry185026 and http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=19644.225 . -84user (talk) 09:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nonsensical Toutatis Picture

edit

The picture claimed to be an artist's concept of Chang'e 2 flying by Toutatis is nonsense. That is a delay-Doppler radar image of the asteroid, not what you would see viewing the object with your eyes. See the 4179 Toutatis article for a rendering of the object's real shape. 207.151.223.146 (talk) 20:41, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Esa support

edit

ESA provided assistenace by sending and receiving data from the ESA Deep space network. It was agreed to base the comunication on Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems standards. 1 November 2007 the first data was received and the first telecomands were sent the same day.Chinese Lunar missions Chang’E-1 and Chang’E-2 and the ESOC support: an example of systems interoperability--Stone (talk) 22:00, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Current location?

edit

The article mentions the asteroid mission being a flyby. It would be useful to know where Chang'e 2 is now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.37.54 (talk) 20:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chang'e 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chang'e 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply