Talk:Post-capitalism

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Post-capitalism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 2 years

This article was nominated for deletion on March 26, 2007. The result of the discussion was KEEP.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Social and political Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

Are Certain Sections Accurate

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Should direct democracy and technocracy be here? Neither have anything to do with capitalism.Reflections of Memory (talk) 02:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

While direct democracy and technocracy are not related to capitalism, they are very important concepts for hypothetical future post-capitalist economic models, at least the ones that are currently being tossed around the relevant circles. I do not mean to conflate the economic and the political, but the these ideas about democracy are very much related to ideas about new kinds of economies.--Animus45 (talk) 04:51, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

The whole libertarian section should probably go, the libertarian right usually advocate private property and a market economy, that is the generally a definition of capitalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ultan42 (talk • contribs) 13:13, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I see the article says Wikipedia is free, but isn't it technically crowdfunded in every sense of the word, both with respect to contributions to the articles there, and the yearly donation? Nobody HAS to pay, but ultimately someone will, to ensure server hosting and maintnance, and keep it alive. Correct me if I'm wrong.--StePedersen (talk) 15:20, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic