Talk:Radio Zamaneh
| This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Sponsership
editIn the sponsorship, sources have been provided but one of the users because of unclear reasons repeatedly delet all and ask for source!! what is the problem? --82.95.182.23 (talk) 17:50, 15 November 2010 (UTC)--82.95.182.23 (talk) 17:50, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- You have to provide reliable sources.Farhikht (talk) 15:40, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- When it has been mentioned Radio Zamaneh piece has been a source for UNITED PRESS INT'L, UPI website has been mentioned. Same for Los Angeles Times, Volkskrant, Kios Band, etc. What do you mean by reliable source?! United Press is not reliable or Los Angeles Times or Kiosk Official website?!! --82.95.182.23 (talk) 01:42, 19 November 2010 (UTC)--82.95.182.23 (talk) 01:42, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- No, the Kiosk Official page isn't reliable source. Others (UPI, etc) are all original research. You should provide a reliable source that proves that "Radio Zamaneh and its English-language page is among the main sources of Iran-related issues for various international news agencies". Please read this section.Farhikht (talk) 13:47, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- When it has been mentioned Radio Zamaneh piece has been a source for UNITED PRESS INT'L, UPI website has been mentioned. Same for Los Angeles Times, Volkskrant, Kios Band, etc. What do you mean by reliable source?! United Press is not reliable or Los Angeles Times or Kiosk Official website?!! --82.95.182.23 (talk) 01:42, 19 November 2010 (UTC)--82.95.182.23 (talk) 01:42, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Criticism of contribution Blck.1364
editThere is criticism of a few contributions including this, which appears to have bad intentions and is based on dubious sources. The user has made several attempts to re-add statements about "leftist approach" as well as the following sentence "Radio Zamane is considered an leftist media, with anti-NATO, anti-American and anti-Israel tendencies, which criticizes Western democracies. The media is sometimes also considered pro-Russian." Can someone take a critical look at this and, if necessary, undo this contribution? Cakeshokolati 11 (talk) 15:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)