Talk:Ubykh people
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ubykh people article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"related groups" info removed from infobox
editFor dedicated editors of this page: The "Related Groups" info was removed from all {{Infobox Ethnic group}} infoboxes. Comments may be left on the Ethnic groups talk page. Ling.Nut 23:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Georgia "invaded"???
editHow Georgia could be "invaded" by Russians in 1864, if it had been within Russian Empire since 1801??--Shakura 14:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Georgia maintained its monarchy and army, who are also responsible for genocide of muslim "south caucasians" during same era, perhaps thats what the writer wanted to say(most of the georgians were muslims back then and probably now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.176.203.242 (talk) 23:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Nevertheless, as in other Northwest Caucasian cultures, women were especially venerated, and the Ubykh language retains a special second person pronoun prefix used exclusively with women (χa-).
Sounds naive, to say the least. The attitude towards women has nothing to do with the presence or absence of gender-sensitivity in grammar. --91.148.159.4 20:55, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ubykh people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.adiga-home.net/Circassians.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Is it a Circassian tribe or Circassian ethnicity?
editCan Ubykhs be a tribe? The thing is that Ubykhs have a different language which is not understandable both for Cricassians and Abkhazians. This means that they are different people from them, although their language is closer to Circassian. In order to be a tribe of a certain people, it has to be understandable to these people, not fully, but at least somehow. Yes, we know that Ubykhs considered themselves as part of Circassian nation. Exactly that is why it is correct to say that they are Circassian ethnicity, so people of Circassian nation. Serfunoheda (talk) 15:51, 24 November 2024 (UTC)