59.149.124.29

For my previous IP addresses, see Special:Contributions/210.6.254.106 and Special:Contributions/58.176.246.42. For the reason I do not want an account, see Wikipedia:Why not create an account?

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (59.149.124.29) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 02:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Khomiddin Sharipov

• See Talk:Khomiddin Sharipov#Requested move 9 August 2017. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Gao Ming Jie, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:40, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

@Oshwah:: that was a merge, not vandalism. I merged Gao Ming Jie to Gao Mingjie because they're about the same person. Regards, 59.149.124.29 (talk) 10:41, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

OOPS! Sorry man! I see the edit summary and what you did - not sure what happened. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:42, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oshin (disambiguation) has been accepted

Oshin (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 12:17, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Move request

• See Talk:Seonu#Requested move 30 September 2017. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:56, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Result: not vandalism; false positive filter hits

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism as caught by filters. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 12:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). 59.149.124.29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: @Alexf: Is this an error? Kindly point to a specific edit of mine that is vandalism. The last thing I was doing was removing spam links to an Indonesian translation agency. That triggered an edit filter because I used the Undo function frequently, but not everything that triggers an edit filter is "vandalism". 59.149.124.29 (talk) 12:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC) Decline reason: I see many attempts at vandalism here. Yamla (talk) 12:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. @Yamla: I've made more than a thousand edits, but no one has ever complained that any of my edits are vandalism (there have been two vandalism warnings placed on my talk page; one was erroneous and the person apologised for placing it, and the other was removed by someone else who concluded that the editor who placed the warning was himself a vandal). Blocked users cannot view Special:AbuseLog, but below is a table of all edits of mine that triggered an edit filter, aside from the most recent "Non-autoconfirmed user rapidly reverting edits" which I have already explained. None of these edits are vandalism, and each of those edits had an edit summary explaining what I was doing. All of these edits are constructive. Not everything that triggers an edit filter is vandalism, which is clear if you read the diffs. I challenge you to point to a single edit of mine which is vandalism. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 13:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC) Table Diff Edit filter triggered Edit summary Explanation of edit Was this edit ever reverted? [1] "speedy deletion template removed" removing speedy. the source confirms the claim that their album sold more than one million copies. start a discography section. categories. I removed a {{db-nn}} tag after having added a sources proving there's a potential claim to notability. No [2] "references removed" rm incorrect, ja:新井将敬 was ethnic Korean & elected to Japan Diet in 1986, see English obit at [3] I removing an incorrect statement sourced to a dead link, and providing a WP:RS link in my edit summary proving that the removed statement is incorrect. No [4] "possible BLP issue or vandalism" MOS:NOTUSA, MOS:SURNAME, MOS:CAPS, nationality categories per nationality stated in infobox Changing the "name" parameter in an infobox triggers this filter. In this case, the name was incorrectly listed as Nitin Khanna, but the person in the article is actually named Jay Kim. I also did other minor copyediting. No [5] "references removed" way too much detail about these people who did nothing relevant to this topic but make extremely obvious observations; if they deserve articles themselves, all the detail about their names and what papers they wrote can go there I condensed a passage of text. The passage contained a citation which was not about the subject of the article and was used to support extraneous detail, so I removed it No [6] "possible BLP issue or vandalism" wrong DEFAULTSORT Changing the "name" parameter in an infobox triggers this filter. I changed the capitalisation of the name in the infobox from "Shin-Je" to "Shin-je" to match MOS:KO. No [7] "possible BLP issue or vandalism" infobox & DEFAULTSORT should match article title capitalisation Similar to above edit: changing capitalism from "Tae-Young" to "Tae-young" to match the article title No [8] "wikilinks removed" WP:APOENTRIES: one bluelink per line WP:APOENTRIES, which I cited in my edit summary, states that entries on name pages should contain only one link on each line, so I removed the extra link No [9] "large plot addition" expand I added one sentence about the plot, citing a reliable source, and a much larger section about the production of the movie, also citing reliable sources No [10] "references removed" wrong DEFAULTSORT; expand; eliminate some WP:CITEOVERKILL from the lede The article had one sentence with six citations to a bunch of articles which only peripherally mentioned the subject. I replaced those citations with better citations which were primarily about the subject. No [11] "possible BLP issue or vandalism" wrong DEFAULTSORT and wrong name; all sources cited give his name as Lai Chu-en. expand. The person's name was misspelled. I provided references giving the correct spelling of his name, and significantly expanded the article as well. No [12] "references removed" cleanup A link in the "External links" section had unnecessary <ref> tags around it preventing it from showing up there, so I removed the <ref> tags while leaving the link in place. I also did other minor copyediting. No [13] "references removed" wrong DEFAULTSORT, broken pinyin, remove citation to user-edited source which fails WP:RS. I removed a reference to Baidu Baike, a user-edited encyclopedia which cannot be used as a reference within Wikipedia. I also did other minor copyediting. No [14] removal of Category:Living People answer {{BLP living dead}} with source. get his name right. article should be about him, not a bunch of quotes about a case he investigated. The guy was dead not living. I provided a source proving that he was dead in the course of expanding his article. No [15] "references removed" remove trivia. certainly not relevant enough for lead paragraph. don't see where it fits in the rest of the article. The article is a BLP; I removed a statement cited to a user-generated source (a webforum). No [16] "removal of Category:Living People" answer {{BLP living dead}} with source The guy was dead not living. I provided a source proving that he was dead in the course of expanding his article. No [17] "removal of Category:Living People" answer {{BLP living dead}} with archive.is version of source cited by Japanese Wikipedia for death date The guy was dead not living. I provided a source proving that he was dead in the course of expanding his article. No [18] "removal of Category:Living People" answering {{BLP living dead}} with offline source The guy was dead not living. I provided a source proving that he was dead in the course of expanding his article. No [19] "removal of Category:Living People" answer {{BLP living dead}} with source; other cleanup The guy was dead not living. I provided a source proving that he was dead in the course of expanding his article. No [20] "removal of Category:Living People" answer {{BLP living dead}} with sources The guy was dead not living. I provided a source proving that he was dead in the course of expanding his article. No [21] "removal of Category:Living People" answer {{BLP living dead}} with sources The guy was dead not living. I provided a source proving that he was dead in the course of expanding his article. No [22] "possible BLP issue or vandalism" wrong DEFAULTSORT, other cleanup Edit consisted entirely of minor copyediting and additions to infobox based on sourced article content. I have no idea what triggered the edit filter. No [23] "references removed" MOS:DAB (no piping, no references, one link per line) There should not be references on disambiguation pages, so I removed them No [24] "Visual edit: Switched" overcapitalisation, etc. I accidentally turned on Visual Editor and turned it off again. Apparently that triggers an edit filter too, perhaps because such edits often contain erroneous Wikimarkup. No Further discussion Let's wait for Alexf (or perhaps Yamla) to return. I can't go into too many details, but I can say that most of the filter hits today are what we'd call false positives. The filter is practically designed to catch false positives. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC) Fair enough. But let me just say this: my entire track record here consists of constructing WP:GNOMEing and expansion of articles like Mizuho Katayama [25], Yun Mi-gyeong [26], Bang Hyun-joo [27], Seong Nak-gun [28], John Wey Ling [29], etc., and I include an edit summary with literally every one of my edits explaining what I'm doing. So I hope you all can understand that it is rather frustrating for me to be accused of vandalism, and even of inappropriately editing my own talk page [30], particularly when no one will actually point to a specific diff of any unconstructive edit I've made. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 14:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC) I've seen this happen before (including the RFPP request) and it's equally frustrating to be involved with edit filters which have this effect. The only thing preventing me unblocking is an element of professional courtesy to the other two admins (and it is possible I've missed something). So hopefully this will get resolved soon and you can then carry on. In the meantime maybe go for a walk and enjoy some fresh air? I'll return in a couple of hours to see if Alexf shows any signs of returning, or if Yamla has had any additional input. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC) zzuuzz Ok. Unblock if you must. All I saw was an unregistered user constantly hitting filters over and over this morning. You would think if the user is not committing vandalism, after the second instance of a filter stopping it, would stop retrying over and over, and find out what the issue is; perhaps even asking a question in the talk page? -- Alexf(talk) 16:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC) Alexf You would think if the user is not committing vandalism, after the second instance of a filter stopping it, would stop retrying over and over. Not all edit filters actually stop a user from performing an edit, or even display a warning screen; the one I triggered certainly doesn't. I only even noticed I triggered it after looking at Special:MyContributions. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 16:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC) (ec) I think one of the key issues here is that none of the filters have ever triggered a warn or disallow action. That's to say, they're just quietly logging in the background and are covered by the bit that says "Entries in this list may be constructive or made in good faith ". IPs wouldn't know if they're at AIV either, and there's no warnings to indicate it might be imminent. Thanks, I'll unblock. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)  Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:15, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for finding those sources and cleaning up Hello, Brother! RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 22:06, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks

For reviewing and improving that citation, I did not find any isbn, that works. .----損齋 (talk) 22:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	This is for your work on Hello, Brother.Keep up the good work. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:57, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

I came across one of your edits here while scrolling through pending changes and decided to check your contribs. I must say, you've got a brilliant track record of constructive edits. Thank you for all your contributions! Enjoy this hot cuppa tea and have a great day! :) Jiten talk contribs 08:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Boxing ring

A good comment. Though the article had no sources at all. I have added two. Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 09:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Chief Justice of Samoa

Thank you so much for your brilliant work on this article! The Drover's Wife (talk) 21:49, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

See here

Pinging you here: Wikipedia_talk:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_December_4 Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:01, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I've noticed your edits in the recent changes filter, and I just wanted to say thank you for your diligent work. Cheers! Boomer VialBe ready to fight the horde! • Contribs 07:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Go Se-tae

Hello. Thank you very much for all of the additional information on Go Se-tae! I did have one question: for the newspaper link that you provided for his death, could you tell me where exactly his obituary is printed in that source. I believe that it is there, I just cannot identify where to click because I don't read/speak Korean, and I wanted to add the clipping to my personal files. Thank you again! Canadian Paul 13:54, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Great! Thanks so much for the information; it is unfortunate to see that I was mistaken in thinking that he was still alive, but it is good to have the case finally solved. I don't know if this is in your field of interest/expertise, but I do have one more related question if you have the time: I have evidence that Hong Jong-o was still alive in 2012, but I have not heard anything since. Since I can't read Korean, it is difficult for me to check, but I was wondering if a quick Google search would turn up anything for you about whether he was still alive or has since died. Canadian Paul 14:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for checking! Since you are kind enough to offer, I'm not too shy to take advantage! There's actually a few Korean Olympians with Wikipedia pages for whom I have no information either way: Park Seong-tae, Kim Ho-soon (cyclist), Sim Myeong-hui, An Jeong-geun, Kim Yun-gi. They are all fairly obscure (at least I think), so I wouldn't expect anything, but if you can find anything, it would be greatly appreciated! Canadian Paul 15:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

editing user talk pages

Hi, when you added your WP:RFD notice to User talk:Ywwuyi, you removed the notice I provided of the nomination I made. I've re-added my notice now. Can you please be more careful when editing user talk pages please? It's bad practice (see WP:TPO) to edit other people's message on talk pages. Thanks. Iffy★Chat -- 10:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

@Iffy: yep, sorry about that, seems to be my day for mistakes. I understand WP:TPO, it was a copy-paste error. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 11:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Hello, I'm Siddiqsazzad001. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Illogicality— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Siddiqsazzad001 (TALK) 11:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

@Siddiqsazzad001: that was a Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion nomination, not vandalism. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 11:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Article Rescue Barnstar

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		For rescuing the Rokkyo Cho Economics Award from deletion by finding multiple foreign-language sources. Thanks for stepping in! MarginalCost (talk) 01:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kim Hong-il (general)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dekimasuよ! 20:45, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Korea Presbyterian Theological Seminary

As you suggested at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korea Presbyterian Theological Seminary, I've moved Korea Presbyterian Theological Seminary to Draft:Orthodox Presbyterian Church of Korea. Note that it'll be deleted under WP:G13 if it's not edited for six months. – Joe (talk) 21:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for everything you do

It's been a while since you've been thanked, so I just wanted to say it again. Especially the draft dabs at RfD — it's never something I want to do, and it makes closing so much easier! Really appreciate it. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:13, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Kim Young-jun

Can you take a look at Talk:Gim Yeongjun#Requested move 4 July 2018. Sawol (talk) 03:39, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Village Law (Turkey) has been accepted

Village Law (Turkey), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Move discussion: Sweetener (album)

Hi, a move proposal of Sweetener (album) was created at Talk:Sweetener (album)#Requested move 22 August 2018. As you have commented on the RfD—thank you for pointing out that it was not the correct place—I invite you to voice your opinion about that request on the aforementioned talk page. — bieχχ (talk) 11:37, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Chai K Toh

Hi - you may want to be aware that temporary or unofficial names used for foreigners in countries like China, Taiwan, Japan, etc. are not real names, and are not legal. Without a clear proof that it is a legal name and you put in wikipedia is like "jumping the gun". The 3rd parties you mention may be using a temporary or unofficial name for their convenience and having a web page on it does not imply its legal status. The university NCKU you cited is not responsible for name verification. They could be using it as a translation to enable their Chinese audience who have problems pronouncing English names. Extra care is needed when you put names on people. I suggest you temporarily remove it until we have verified sources to confirm it. Fellow007 (talk) 18:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

당신을 위한 반스타!

	성실 반스타
	Thank you very much for your working in all things. 칼빈500 (talk) 01:53, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Park Mok-wol

Yes, I had issues with your edits to the actual article. You added material to the summary that was not in the body of the article and reduced the section on his life to a ridiculous snippet. I'll restore those two sections and leave your other additions. Sweetpool50 (talk) 15:29, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Query

• See Talk:Park Yong-chul (pilot)#Requested move 29 September 2018. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:39, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Writing lines

On 11 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Writing lines, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that writing lines (example pictured), as cartoon character Bart Simpson does on a chalkboard, has survived even as other forms of school discipline have fallen out of favour? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Writing lines. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Writing lines), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Writing lines

I'm one of the (likely many people) that read the article after seeing it at DYK on the front page. I scrolled through the page history and saw your contributions to the article, and I just wanted to say thank you for taking the time and effort to improve it. So, here's my sincere thanks as a reader and editor of Wikipedia. Clovermoss (talk) 02:01, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your help with Direxion. Benjamin (talk) 07:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for redirects help

Thanks much for your help with condensing my Redirects for Discussion (RfD) section, I'm new to the markup code so I can use all the assistance I can get! JustinMal1 (talk) 02:07, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shuikou (disambiguation) has been accepted

Shuikou (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JavaHurricane 06:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Mind if I start a user page for you?

I know you are an anonymous user, but you have made so many edits logged out. I was wondering if you want a user page started for you.  :) Aasim 23:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

@Awesome Aasim: sure, that would be great. And thanks for your response on User talk:Awesome Aasim/xfdvote! Cheers, 59.149.124.29 (talk) 00:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Done. You can add content to it here: special:edit/User:59.149.124.29 Aasim 03:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yishai (name) has been accepted

Yishai (name), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JHunterJ (talk) 12:19, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

"Park Jimin (musician)/junk" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Park Jimin (musician)/junk and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 16#Park Jimin (musician)/junk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:32, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

---