Jedi6

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting --~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

---

Archives
August 2005 – March 2006 March 2006 – May 2006

fall of crouscant

it had nothing to do with the book the book took place in abuot 25 ABY and this happened during the clone wars

Johnstown article

It now seems that the two editors are removing everything because it might be in a suburb of Johnstown you might want to take a look at the edit history and see. Darthgriz98 19:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Friend

I added your name to this. Check it out and put your sig over my generic link, if you don't mind your name being there. Thanks! the_ed17^(T)(P)(F)(W) 02:10, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Come join us at the WarWiki Jedi6! You can write about real wars AND fictional wars (i.e. Star Wars) !!!!! So you might have a ton of fun there. I dunno. the_ed17^(T)(P)(F)(W) 17:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject Nintendo-Portal Notice

You listed yourself as a member of Wikiproject Nintendo. Please do see This proposal for a nintendo Portal.--Ac1983fan (talk • contribs) 19:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Brazil4Linux never dies

I bet that other admins are already involved with Mexico4Linux and Canada4Linux. He's actually followed me into Canadian politician articles (just to disrupt by whatever means necessary).

BTW, what happened to Daniel Davis? GoldDragon 00:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Johnstown?

Do you live in Johnstown? — Deckiller 07:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

No Jedi6-(need help?) 04:19, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Catagories

How would one go about making a catagory? For example: Jedi with green light-sabers?
Thank you more than you could ever know. -Shadow the Edge-hog 03:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars ship names

Hey, Coredesat! I've read your comments on the aformentioned articles. Please explain your thinking more to me, as your definately have more experience than I. If necessary, I'll add a description for every ship: it's condensed history, commander, accomplishments, famous battles it was at, and where it was destroyed.

Thanks,

RelentlessRouge 11:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Star Wars newsletter

Project updates Greetings, Star Wars editors! Deckiller here. It's the first edition of the WikiProject Star Wars newsletter, and yes, it's a semi-ripoff of the Esperenza newsletter. I think it's important to begin with some good news: Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones, Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, and Jabba the Hutt have reached featured article status! Kudos to the editors who helped obtain these achievements! WikiProject Star Wars is also on a mission to improve Star Wars articles using the following ideas: An out of universe perspective versus an in universe perspective (see Wikipedia:Writing about fiction and the future ammendments to our manual of style) Evolving lists into regular articles Moving excess information and specifics to Wookieepedia (and providing links to Wookieepedia per the "see also" and/or "external links" sections) Enhanced communication amongst WikiProject members More to come These should provide the basic steps needed to improve and "encyclopedia-fy" the Star Wars series of articles. Things to do There are plenty of Wikipedia:WikiProject Star Wars/things to do. An update to the page is coming very soon, and it will represent the new and exciting changes that Star Wars pages will be receiving! Out-of-universe versus in-universe perspectives Although details are forthcoming, I would like to take this time to explain the gist of this concept. Wikipedia has generally agreed that fictional articles should write about the topic from a "real world" perspective, focusing on real world issues and topics, with a section or two for plot synopsis and so on. Jabba the Hutt is a solid character example, and Clone Wars (Star Wars) is quickly moving toward an out of universe perspective.

Article evolution As many of you know, lists of minor Star Wars-related themes are very common on Wikipedia; however, since these may be seen as violations of Wikipedia policy (and having seperate articles would breach even more policies), the tentative solution is to create general articles on a list's topic (for example, turning List of Star Wars devices into Technology of Star Wars, which allows us to cover everything from hyperspace to comlinks in a general encyclopedic fashion). This can be very tough for some broad topics, so the key is organization. I encourage all editors to list their ideas on the WikiProject talk page. It will be a very difficult — but tangible — effort. For an example, let me point you to the Final Fantasy WikiProject. Some of us over at that WikiProject decided to turn various components of Final Fantasy X, such as Pyreflies, Yevon, and the backstory — into an article describing the world of Spira. Location descriptions were given a List of locations in Spira article, and the details themselves were placed on the Spira (Final Fantasy X) page. This is a decent template to follow — however, we will need to place priority on out-of-universe, "real life" topics and perspectives in realtion to the article. Sounds confusing, eh? It won't, for examples will be popping up left and right in the near future! Signed... — Deckiller 03:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

"Publisher's description" and "Inside front cover" sections in Star Wars issue articles

I just got a little ... uhh ... reprimand I guess for my additions of the afforementioned stuff to articles, with the accusation of copyright infringement and all that. I kinda took them as being Fair Use, but a little wary at first about the front cover stuff, then when nobody said anything to the contrary for a while, just went with it from there. Soooooo, I guess what I'm getting at is that I just want a second opinion, and you've been some help to me in the past, so I came to you. I've been trying to contact Dark Horse about this issue multiple times over the past month or so via their Contact Us page on their website (and more recently StarWars.com), but to no avail. Just wanted the ole second opinion before I went on a deletion crusade thru the masses of pages I've got descriptions and the like on. --Skope 03:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Oh yeah, and CovenantD is all about some merging of the issue articles from Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (comics), and he might end up going for the same at Republic, Empire, Legacy, Rebellion, X-Wing, etc. Any thoughts? --Skope 04:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Apocalypse

Can I become your apprentice? :P GangstaEB help me improve! 19:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars WikiProject Roll Call

" Hello! "

Thank you for contributions. You have signed as a member of the Star Wars WikiProject there is a Roll Call going on currently at the Star Wars WikiProject talk page. Please sign if you still want to help out.

Again, Thank you for your help! --Team6and7 02:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Sockpuppet request

Long time no see. I have a special request. Could you find out who the anon contributors belong to on Howard Moscoe? 201.78.252.196 and 201.78.252.196 GoldDragon 22:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Liberation of Naboo

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Liberation of Naboo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Liberation of Naboo. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Pascal.Tesson 01:29, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Doom 3: Reception

I do strongly support some of the criticism and rebuttal sections, though they are more the opinion of gaming experience instead of being strictly factual and sourceable. Do you think I've gone too far? --GoldDragon 04:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Cats and Dogs Portals

Hi, Jedi6. If you can offer some tips on the respective portal talk pages about how to improve Cats and Dogs up to "featured" quality, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Rfrisbie^talk 18:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

List of Star Wars books

Question: I was looking at the list and I was wondering what you thought of removing the links for the headers not all of them have links and it makes the page hard to read. For continuity, I thought it would be better not to have them. An example would be Jedi Apprentice Series it would look nicer without the link. Empress 4t 12:08, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

How do I file a formal complaint against a user?

Hello. You recently issued me a warning for attacking another user. However, the user is posting libelous remarks against me. You can see here [1] that the person mentions me at the bottom. The person has made up this info or is twisting statements around to attack credibility without solid evidence. I would like to report it, but I have found no way to do so. I'm a member of the press and my site is reliable and this person is not basing his claims on facts, which I thought speculation or hearsay is not allowed. I know it is just a userpage, but I refuse to remove my tidbit about this user and the site he represents until he removes his remarks. Thanks. --TSA 06:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

I also posted rebuttals to his reliability claims [2], but I am not sure if he is allowed to remove those since it is "his" page. Would it be best to remove those from that page and post them on my own user talk page? --TSA 06:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Vortex

Excellent! Welcome back. — Deckiller 07:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Those are how many characters have been added/removed from the article (red = removed, green = added). Also, it's easier to spot vandalism now, because there are autoeditsummaries when people blank pages, revert, replace large amounts of text, etc. — Deckiller 07:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

User:JackSparrow Ninja/Source reliability

In response to User talk:JackSparrow Ninja#User:JackSparrow Ninja/Source reliability

Hi Jedi 6,

As I've put in the top note:

This page is not intended to either praise sources or harm sources for who they are. This page is to reflect the nature of a source's reliability; a positive or negative comment is up to how they work: Wikipedia is not censored.

The fact that the webmaster has a Wikipedia account, obviously doesn't suddenly make him or the website more or less reliable. Though since he's since focussed his activities on his site, and people have stopped quoting him as a user (OR), I've corrected the header to reflect the website. It was not meant as a personal attack, those I always try to avoid.

The 'tone' of the page comes from when I put it first up, just as a basic outline. I just didn't really get back to it yet. I've editted it though, reflecting updates that have since happened and referenced it more.

Removing the links would make it sort of useless. It is set up as a help for editors, yet if they don't know exactly which source it is, or where to find it, wouldn't really help anyone.

Thanks for 'inspiring' me to improve the article though.

I hope to have informed you well enough. If not, feel free to leave me a message.

JackSparrow Ninja 07:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Jedi6, in regards to this page, I believe the user does not have an understanding of what the term "reliable" means. Every single major, reliable news outlet has had a bad story or inaccurate info posted before. This user is claiming that an April Fools Joke and a story my site retracted, and explained why, are the reasons why my site is unreliable, even though taking a closer look would show that we have: original news reports that can be independently verified, a high financial stake in the site as we pay for serious server costs and other expenses which are a burden to keep doing if we're reporting "unreliable" news, we always cite sources if we get the news from a second or third party, and we provide or own original coverage through reviews and media conent. So because two stories out of our thousands weren't "correct", we're not unreliable. On the same page, this user lists Land of the Legend, a site I believe the user JackSparrow_Ninja is a part of, or even the owner (Martjin Mujer himself) and is trying to use it as a form of taunt and self promotion. Their site is strictly dedicated to the niche market of The Legend of Zelda series, which does not have enough "news" about it to warrant a "news site", but a "fan site". Their site's content is strictly hearsay news reporting, and they don't even have that much "Zelda" content anymore as most of it seems down. They try to push (C) material as "original content" of their own, and they claim they are a major media outlet with access to resources, yet they couldn't even deliver on their claim of "superior" coverage of the Wii Launch in Europe, especially anything on Twilight Princess, nor did they even provide coverage of GDC in Germany, which they said they would definitely have. Their content and nature makes them an obvious fan site, and all they do is take content from other sites and try to push it as their own. They're reliable...for a fan site, but their original reports are always way too generic and UNVERIFIABLE - they never should be used for a source on Wikipedia and even in some guy's own personal "source reliablity" article they shouldn't be listed as "credible" or "reliable". The entire page is out to assert Land of the Legend's "reliablity", how it is more reliable than IGN for crying out loud, and it's more of their propaganda campaign. I really suggest the page be remove and locked - as I was explained, Wikipedia is not a message board and the place for personal opinions in articles, but rather facts and truths. I seriously take the user's recent actions, as well as his history of actions against my comments and edits, as harassment and I really would like him to be removed. I am not the only user his has complaints, he routinely ad spams Legend of Zelda articles, which users have routinely told him to stop. This needs to end, give him a final warning of something or remove him because he contributes nothing but trouble in the majority of his edits, and he is simply around to promote a fan site on Wikipedia. --TSA 02:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

JackSparrow_Ninja recently added a citation to the Tingle RPG entry with a link to Land of the Legend claiming the game is not coming out on the said date a print magazine claimed. While the claim may not be true, Land of the Legend provides NO SOURCE for their info and they are NOT RELIABLE. This user account really needs to be removed, he will not stop ad-spamming Land of the Legend. Also, if you want an example of the site's reliability see this [3]. They hijacked my account (The Silent Assassin) and are posting crap with it. That's the mark of a professional site? I also seriously demand that JackSparrow_Ninja's entry on his reliability page be deleted or have his entry on my site removed because it is unfounded and just libel. --TSA 02:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

fair use in portals

there is currently a proposed amendment to include fair use images in the portal space at Wikipedia:Fair use/Amendment/Fair use images in portals2. I have decided to contact you because you expressed interest in this topic in the past. Please know that I am contacting all editors who partipated in discussions regarding this at WT:FUC. -ΖαππερΝαππερ ^Babel_Alexandria 22:48, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

List of Wii games

Hey there Jedi6,

I've noted that you've contributed before to the List of Wii games. Just wanted to let you know that the list is getting ready for Featured status and is currently undergoing a Peer Review. If you can take a moment to look over the article and add your suggestions/comments for improvement here, it'd be much appreciated. Thanks! -Digiwrld1 21:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Feel the Magic Screenshot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Feel the Magic Screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Tieinterceptor.jpg

Hello Jedi6, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Tieinterceptor.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Jedi6. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:28, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Patterns of Force (novel)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Patterns of Force (novel), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Patterns of Force (novel) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

unused redirect --32X 21:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Patterns of Force (novel), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

your missing the drive inn theatre in Mitchell SD it has been in business for years. The list is incomplete.........Thanks

Please up date your list of drive inn to include the starlight drive inn in mithchell

Non-free use disputed for Image:Electroplankton.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Electroplankton.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Request your comments

I created a proposal. Please comment here.

Note: Please analyze each proposal on their own validity - do not reject a proposal just because you rejected a different one. - A Link to the Past (talk) 19:28, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Super Princess Peach boxart.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Super Princess Peach boxart.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Malkinann 12:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Nintendo Page Redesign

A new page design is being considered for the WikiProject Nintendo page. A rough draft can be viewed here. Please add all comments and thoughts to the discussion. From the automated, Anibot 22:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

TIE Defender

I used to edit TIE Defender a long time ago, and I planned to do so again until I realized that it was merged into TIE fighter. I feel that the Defender, TIE Avenger (which formerly had a substantial article in its own right back in 2006, although it might have been deleted), TIE Bomber, TIE Interceptor, etc. should get seperate articles, as being merged into TIE fighter does not do justice to their distinctiveness and roles. Did a majority of editors back such a merge?

Also, I have a problem with a guy that keeps deleting sourced material on Michael Ignatieff, making excuses about RS and BLP, even though the "blog" in question references reputable news sources. GoldDragon 18:06, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

GoldDragon 18:06, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ForceHereticII.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ForceHereticII.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ForceHereticIII.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ForceHereticIII.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Adventures of Lando Calrissian.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Adventures of Lando Calrissian.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jedi Eclipse.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jedi Eclipse.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Galaxy of Fear.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Galaxy of Fear.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Swarm War(DN).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Swarm War(DN).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Recovery(novel).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Recovery(novel).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Hive.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Hive.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Mandalorian Armor.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Mandalorian Armor.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Odama.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Odama.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 19:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:True Swing Golf.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:True Swing Golf.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Traitor (Novel).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Traitor (Novel).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ylesia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ylesia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bloodlinesbook.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodlinesbook.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Edge of Victory II.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Edge of Victory II.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AForestApart.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AForestApart.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

=D

User:Jedi6/Revenge of Jedi6 Wow. Just wow. I remember that! ...so long ago. the_ed17 15:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Also look at this, isn't it nice. Texcarson (talk) 21:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

[4] ...what the heck...? So worried about socks then...when he was a sock himself? :) Cheers Jedi6, and have fun with whatever you are up to in RL... —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 20:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rub Rabbits (US).jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Rub Rabbits (US).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Young Jedi Knights.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Young Jedi Knights.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Han Solo Adventures

The article The Han Solo Adventures has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BK no significant 3rd party coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- RP459 ^Talk/_{Contributions} 21:47, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rogue Planet (novel)

The article Rogue Planet (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BK no significant 3rd party coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- RP459 ^Talk/_{Contributions} 21:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Star Wars: Darth Bane: Path of Destruction

The article Star Wars: Darth Bane: Path of Destruction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BK no significant 3rd party coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- RP459 ^Talk/_{Contributions} 21:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Rogue Planet (novel)

I have nominated Rogue Planet (novel), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rogue Planet (novel). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- RP459 ^Talk/_{Contributions} 03:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox SW books

Template:Infobox SW books has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fool'sBargain.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fool'sBargain.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Where do babies come from? listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Where do babies come from?. Since you had some involvement with the Where do babies come from? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Where do babies come from listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Where do babies come from. Since you had some involvement with the Where do babies come from redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Darth Maul: Shadow Hunter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darth Maul: Shadow Hunter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darth Maul: Shadow Hunter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jedi Eclipse.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jedi Eclipse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Recovery(novel).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Recovery(novel).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ylesia.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ylesia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Swarm War(DN).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Swarm War(DN).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Balance Point.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Balance Point.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dark Tide Onslaught.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dark Tide Onslaught.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dark Tide Ruin.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dark Tide Ruin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DarkJourney.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DarkJourney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Destiny'sWay.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Destiny'sWay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Edge of Victory II.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Edge of Victory II.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EdgeofVictoryI.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EdgeofVictoryI.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Final prophecy(novel).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Final prophecy(novel).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ForceHereticI.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ForceHereticI.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hero's Trial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hero's Trial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RebelDream.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RebelDream.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:StarbyStar.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:StarbyStar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Jedi Order series

Template:New Jedi Order series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page.

Orphaned non-free image File:Traitor (Star Wars novel).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Traitor (Star Wars novel).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Coruscant Nights for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coruscant Nights is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coruscant Nights until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 15:00, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Hive book cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Hive book cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Rogue Planet (novel) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rogue Planet (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rogue Planet (novel) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SL93 (talk) 21:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)