Samsara
| This user has left Wikipedia. Samsara has not edited Wikipedia since June 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Archives
edit| Threads | Dates | Archive | |
| 1 to | 39 | September 2003 to February 20 2006 | 0 |
| 40 to | 82 | February 20 2006 to March 19 2006 | 1 |
| 83 to | 101 | up to and all of May 2006 | 2 |
| 102 to | 121 | June 2006 | 3 |
| 122 to | 169 | July 2006 | 4 |
| 170 to | 203 | 1 to August 19 2006 | 5 |
| 204 to | 234 | 19 August to 30 September 2006 | 6 |
| 235 to | 266 | October 2006 | 7 |
| 267 to | 305 | November 2006 | 8 |
| 306 to | 344 | December 2006 | 9 |
| 345 to | 384 | January to April 2007 | 10 |
| 385 to | 440 | May to December 2007 | 11 |
| 441 to | 471 | December 2007 to February 2008 | 12 |
| 472 to | 544 | 2008-2012 | 13 |
| 545 to | 626 | 2013-September 2015 | 14 |
| 627 to | 695 | October 2015-2016 | 15 |
| 696 to | 725 | First half of 2017 | 16 |
| 726 to | 807 | Second half of 2017 | 17 |
| 808 to | 834 | 2018 | 18 |
| 835 to | 899 | 2019 | 19 |
| RfC invites 00 | |||
The article Canon PowerShot SX410 IS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable. The article itself states that this camera did not receive significant coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qono (talk) 21:23, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The article Canon PowerShot SX400 IS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This camera does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines and should be deleted. The article itself states that the camera did not receive significant coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qono (talk) 21:25, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2020
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment asks whether partial blocks should be enabled on the English Wikipedia. If enabled, this functionality would allow administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces, rather than the entire site.
- A proposal asks whether admins who don't use their tools for a significant period of time (e.g. five years) should have the toolset procedurally removed.
- Following a successful RfC, a whitelist is now available for users whose redirects will be autopatrolled by a bot, removing them from the new pages patrol queue. Admins can add such users to Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist after a discussion following the guidelines at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist.
Arbitration
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted
rather thanreasonably construed
. - Following the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Bradv, Casliber, David Fuchs, DGG, KrakatoaKatie, Maxim, Newyorkbrad, SoWhy, Worm That Turned, Xeno.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
Miscellaneous
- This issue marks three full years of the Admin newsletter. Thanks for reading!
Administrators' newsletter – February 2020
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
- The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with
wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input
. No proposed process received consensus.
Technical news
- Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
- When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [1]
Arbitration
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2020 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2020, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2020, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- The English Wikipedia has reached six million articles. Thank you everyone for your contributions!
Administrators' newsletter – March 2020
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
must not
undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather thanshould not
. - A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
Technical news
- Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2020 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: BRPever, Krd, Martin Urbanec, MusikAnimal, Sakretsu, Sotiale, and Tks4Fish. There are a total of seven editors that have been appointed as stewards, the most since 2014.
- The 2020 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Ajraddatz and Uzoma Ozurumba; they will serve for one year.
Administrators' newsletter – April 2020
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.
Technical news
- There is a plan for new requirements for user signatures. You can give feedback.
Arbitration
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
Miscellaneous
- The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
The file File:Tuatara wedge.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2020
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
- Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
- A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
- A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.
Technical news
- The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
- Enterprisey created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.
Miscellaneous
- A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.
Werner Heisenberg
editHi there, please remove the pending changes protection of Werner Heisenberg. I belive it's no longer applicable. comrade waddie96 (talk) 18:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- While I don't share your optimism and would observe that it was needed as recently as March, I will disable it as a test per your request. Thanks for the heads-up. Samsara 10:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
The page is both indefinite pending-changes protected and indefinite semi-protected. The first of these is therefore apparently redundant. I see you were the last one involved in protecting the page. Mind fixing this needless redundancy? Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- The verb "fixing" does not apply to things that cause no issues. Furthermore, there is an unresolved bug that makes keeping PC active the currently correct practice. Samsara 11:35, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2020
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).
Administrator changes
CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment asks whether the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS) should allowed any unblock request or just private appeals.
- The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.
Arbitration
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
Technical news
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
Arbitration
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
BOTN
editIn case you were not aware, there is a discussion at BOTN regarding a bot you have blocked. Your participation would be appreciated. Primefac (talk) 20:20, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Please add page protection level for CBS Sports & NBC Sports
editHello, Samsara (talk), I was wondering if there would be a way you or any other admin could please add a protection level to the CBS Sports & NBC Sports articles here on Wikipedia? There's plenty of vandals out there who keep making disruptive edits by adding text claiming that both CBS & NBC broadcast NBA games on CBS & NBC. Neither claim is factually correct. I'd greatly appreciate it if you or another admin could please add a protection level to both articles preventing these sockpuppet accounts from futher vandalizing these articles. Please help? Thank you in advance. Charlesaaronthompson (talk) 15:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
Administrator changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
- Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
- There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.
Happy First Edit Day!
editHave a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
edit| Hey, Samsara. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 07:30, 16 August 2020 (UTC) |
Reduce protection level of Nickelodeon Kid's Choice Awards pages
editYou've indefinitely semi-protected a bunch of Nickelodeon's kid's choice award pages due to long term abuse. Would it be possible for you to reduce the protection levels on those pages to pending changes? They've been very infrequently edited since protection. Full list of affected pages:
- 2005 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2006 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2007 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2008 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2009 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2010 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2011 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2013 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2014 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2015 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2016 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2017 Kids' Choice Awards
Chess (talk) (please use {{ping|Chess}} on reply) 02:36, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- I don't understand this request - "been very infrequently edited since protection" is the intended effect. There is no expectation that articles of historic award ceremonies will continue to receive legit edits at a high rate. Samsara 00:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
- A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors
must
orshould
use the articles for creation process. - A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.
Hello?
editJust checking in to see how you're doing, Sam!! Long time - no hear. Atsme Talk 📧 22:52, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Atsme: Nice to hear from you. I'm doing okay, thanks. How are you? Samsara 00:43, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Surviving!! I was just checking in because I haven't heard from you in a while. I feel better now. Are you getting through the COVID pandemic relatively unscathed? Atsme 💬 📧 00:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Have so far not tested positive, so either haven't caught it, or I am/have been asymptomatic. But I don't mingle as much and I adhere, literally, to masks and soap. What about you - when you write "surviving", one might be concerned... Samsara 00:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Mine is more with reference to WP.
I'm enjoying life on Bonaire where we've been blessed to have very few COVID cases, but unfortunately, 2 deaths. We're at -0- new cases now, so Saturday night is mine for the taking and I'm headed out the door!! Take care, Sam - enjoy the weekend and happy editing! Atsme 💬 📧 01:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Mine is more with reference to WP.
- Have so far not tested positive, so either haven't caught it, or I am/have been asymptomatic. But I don't mingle as much and I adhere, literally, to masks and soap. What about you - when you write "surviving", one might be concerned... Samsara 00:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Surviving!! I was just checking in because I haven't heard from you in a while. I feel better now. Are you getting through the COVID pandemic relatively unscathed? Atsme 💬 📧 00:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
The article Samsung NX 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 OIS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NPRODUCT.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 01:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
Administrator changes
Jackmcbarn
There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created
.
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
Technical news
- The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (phab:T261630).
Arbitration
- The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
- Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.
Miscellaneous
- The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
- Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.
Halloween and LGBT People
editHello Samsara--I am doing some research on Halloween and discovering that there is a long historical relationship between LGBTQ+ people and Halloween, and that Halloween--similar to Carnival--has been a very queer holiday. I would like to add some of that information to the Halloween article but need access to do so. Please let me know if I would be allowed access. Thanks! RachelWex (talk) 22:43, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @RachelWex: your account was upgraded to extended confirmed user in 2016. That's like level 2. Editing the article should only require level 1 ("autoconfirmed") per the configuration made to it, so you should be able to edit. If you are experiencing problems, they are not to do with the protection settings of the article. Perhaps you were trying to edit during a database lock? Try again and if you encounter error messages, maybe take them to WP:VP/T, where you'll get a quicker response than I can usually give right now. Samsara 00:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2020
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet
, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
Technical news
- Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
- Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
- Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.
Arbitration
- The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
- The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.
Miscellaneous
- A reminder that
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
(American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
- A reminder that
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Administrators' newsletter – December 2020
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is a request for comment in progress to either remove T3 (duplicated and hardcoded instances) as a speedy deletion criterion or eliminate its seven-day waiting period.
Technical news
- Voting for proposals in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey, which determines what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year, will take place from 8 December through 21 December. In particular, there are sections regarding administrators and anti-harassment.
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 7 December 2020 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Please see an unprotect request
editPlease see the unprotect request at User_talk:BethNaught#Hanukkah regarding the Hanukkah article which was indefinitely protected in 2016. Debresser (talk) 23:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Immune system protection
editI saw your note after I protected that article (and made a hash of it in doing it). I did it for 12 hours, after reviewing some of the vandalism and figuring 12 hours would take it past it being TFA. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:33, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- According to server time, it's now yesterday's FA, so I think your decision is fine. Just because we haven't, as far as I can recall, interacted before, I want to make sure you're aware of the convention of generally not protecting the TFA to allow newbies to get a first taste of editing Wikipedia. The idea is to especially not protect it while it's the main article, so in that light, as I said, what you did seems fine. Cheers, Samsara 01:41, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- Concur. Thanks for the tip! --Hammersoft (talk) 02:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Protected page
editYou protected the page for three years. Guess what? I have a calendar. And my calendar is now set for three years from today. You cannot stop me!
2600:100E:B135:B368:3641:DD96:DC8E:1214 (talk) 08:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Protection
editWhy this page is unprotected now?. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 18:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed. Samsara 18:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. But it was indefinitely ECP before. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 19:04, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- I can see one recent edit that would have benefited, from DarkArmy - are there others? Samsara 19:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Well, sorta... they did participate in discussion. Samsara 19:57, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- I can see one recent edit that would have benefited, from DarkArmy - are there others? Samsara 19:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. But it was indefinitely ECP before. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 19:04, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2021
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.
Technical news
- You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.
Arbitration
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes)
. The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason). - Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
A barnstar for you!
edit| The Admin's Barnstar | |
| Did you just protect TWO pages I was involved with? Good work on WP:RFPP in the last 24 hours. Scorpions13256 (talk) 19:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC) |
- Thank you, Scorpions13256. I used to be a lot more active at RfPP a few years ago, let's see if I can claw my way back to previous activity levels (probably not, but I'll try to make a contribution when time permits.) In any case, I appreciate the award. Samsara 20:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Rihanna
editSeeing as Tbhotch was vandalising the page the most, shouldn’t it be extended for a little while so that genuine editors can edit it without being penalised for it? 2A04:4A43:44FF:996D:5C57:B872:3441:E7FB (talk) 20:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Adding pp-vandalism and pp-pc1 in Johannesburg
editHello samsara, because you are protected Johannesburg in semi for 3 months and indefinite pending changes. Please adding pp-vandalism and pp-pc1 in the article. Thanks. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 11:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your attention to this detail. We have bots who do that. Regards, Samsara 11:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Michael Spence
editThe section you added on the no-confidence vote is already in the article (under "Fundraising and expansion of the university"): When international student numbers did not reach an expected increase in 2012, the university was forced to make staff redundant, in response to which 80 of the university's Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences teaching staff voted on a motion of no confidence in Spence.
. This is why it is so hard to explain this at RPP - the IP users are in part removing material that is already there. Deus et lex (talk) 13:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Happy to change to "more than 80" and add "overwhelmingly endorsed" though. Deus et lex (talk) 13:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I have combined into the one section. By the way, the accusation of sockpuppetry was totally unfair and unreasonable. Deus et lex (talk) 13:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I made no such accusation. I laid out facts that could have been explained in other ways. Samsara 13:21, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I don't understand why I make a complaint to help improve an article and instead end up being the one that is complained about. How is that helpful? Deus et lex (talk) 13:29, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I made no such accusation. I laid out facts that could have been explained in other ways. Samsara 13:21, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I have combined into the one section. By the way, the accusation of sockpuppetry was totally unfair and unreasonable. Deus et lex (talk) 13:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Happy to change to "more than 80" and add "overwhelmingly endorsed" though. Deus et lex (talk) 13:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for improving the article, and apologies for being cranky with you yesterday. Even if you choose to take no further action on the RPP, I'd be grateful if you could keep an eye on the article at least, the IPs have been reverting far more than what you have added in. Deus et lex (talk) 00:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Protected article
editHi!
On 19:49, 27 January 2021 you protected Andrés Arauz, something that seems to be a reasonable precautionary measure. However, some old vandalism dating back to 20 January remains and can't be fixed in <ref name=":0">{{Cite web|date=2016-08-12|title=Andrés Arauz nuevo[…]. See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andr%C3%A9s_Arauz&type=revision&diff=1003871804&oldid=1001611559
Thanks for fixing and have a nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.195.158.232 (talk) 00:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Done Thank you. Samsara 03:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2021
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).
|
|
|
Arbitration
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people
, replacing the 1932 cutoff.
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!
User acting childish and raging for no reason
editA user by the name of TVFan88 has been acting very childish such as raging in all caps, whining over little things, etc, he also has been attacking me by constantly edit warring against me in a childish manner, he seems to also have anger issues. I think you should block him until further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pong3SouthFrieza34 (talk • contribs) 03:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Which articles is this affecting? Samsara 03:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- It seems to be affecting the Horrid Henry (TV series) page, but I do believe Pong3SouthFrieza34 is telling the truth as unlike TVFan88, he doesn't seem to be raging and he also is providing a source, while TVFan88 is going crazy at him for no reason at all and is calling it fake with no evidence either.
This drama is over, The reasons i put up a UNO reverse card, You have been Edit warring along with other users Edit warring, restoring hoax on that page! some users are sockpuppets, And they restore hoaxes for no reason, The source is fake, It's inspect Element, And also this is very Cringy nowadays, And it's fake news, You are acting like Fox News! That's why i put up the UNO Reverse Card here so you can stay away from this page and restoring hoax, You and your little lies, It wasn't me That i did, It was you, I can't stand with this cringe, It has to stop.
THANK YOU!
-TVFan88 11:30PM — Preceding unsigned comment added by TVFan88 (talk • contribs) 04:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
No TVFan, you need stop this, you are acting childish by going back and forth with him, especially you TVFan, as you have been making rather ridiculous comparsions, like are you really comparing a whole entire News station to one single user? Also enough with the childish and amateur comments such as "Cringey" or "UNO Reverse card" as it makes you look even more childish than you already are. Not to mention, DO YOU EVEN HAVE PROOF IT'S INSPECT ELEMENT? No? then OK, it will stay until the time being.
UNO Reverse Card
-TVFan88 (talk) 3:00PM EST — Preceding undated comment added 20:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Is that all you say? UNO Reverse Card? Do you really think that's funny? Well it's not, I wouldn't be surprised if you were one of those generic Gotards that like to act childish for no reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolman971 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Samsara 08:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2021
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
- A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the
delete-redirectuserright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Wikipedia:Page mover/delete-redirect. - A request for comment asks if sysops may
place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions
? - There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.
Technical news
- When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
- When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
- There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).
Arbitration
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people.
Sanctions issued under GamerGate are now considered Gender and sexuality sanctions. - The Kurds and Kurdistan case was closed, authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed
.
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2021 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AmandaNP, Operator873, Stanglavine, Teles, and Wiki13.
You placed the Toyota Camry article under the Pending Changes protection on October 13, 2017 (apparently with no specified expiration date). It seems that the article has remained under the PC protection since then. Could you please unprotect the article now? Per the WP:PCPP policy, "Indefinite PC protection should be used only in cases of severe long-term disruption," and that's not really the case here. Looking at the article's history for February-March, I don't see a few edits that were not accepted but they did not appear to have been actual vandalism. I don't think the article qualifies for PC protection now, as there is no active vandalism or BLP or copyright violations there. Thanks, Nsk92 (talk) 12:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Black panther
editHello, I see you have placed PCP on Black panther. However, this is giving autoconfirmed users an edge in edit wars, which can be problematic. Would you consider unprotecting? Thanks! Firestar464 (talk) 01:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Recent edits convince me that it should remain thusly protected. Samsara 02:02, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2021
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the
delete-redirectuserright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.
Technical news
- When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
- Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)
Arbitration
- A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.
Administrators' newsletter – May 2021
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
- The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.
Technical news
- The user group
oversightwill be renamed tosuppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.
- The user group
Arbitration
- The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.
Administrators' newsletter – June 2021
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.
- Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.
Technical news
- Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.
Arbitration
- After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.
Unprotection request
edit1 was put under pending changes 2 years ago for frequent vandalism, but there has been little since. I propose that this page be unprotected since it can be handled by regular counter-vandalism patrollers. Thanks in advance! (please ping on reply) Sennecaster (What now?) 05:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- It is under semi, not PC1. The PC1 has remained enabled because of this bug. Samsara 02:03, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Question
editHi @Samsara:, Can I ask question to you ? When i read any wikipedia article at the end of article I found categories box .How to remove this?(Fade258 (talk) 12:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC))
- I suspect the most comprehensive solution would be a userscript through GreaseMonkey, as that will work even when you're not logged in, as long as you're using the same browser where you installed the script. Mediawiki also very similarly provides a userscripts mechanism, but these will only be active when you are logged in. I'm not aware of any script that does exactly what you're asking, but it is definitely possible to create one with GreaseMonkey. HTH, Samsara 18:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
- An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.
Technical news
- IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.
Arbitration
- The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.
Technical news
- Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)
Arbitration
- Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.
Miscellaneous
- You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.
The article Miswart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. rsjaffetalk 23:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello Samsara, I just want you to protect The Magic School Bus TV series pages from vandals.
editHello. Samsara are you an administrator around Wikipedia. I need your help, because I notice that the 1994-1997 TV series the Magic School Bus has been vandalised and reverted over and over again.
The vandal was from an anonymous user 2603:8080:600:4486:49F4:3D85:9765:95EA who removed all of the Canada things on the article. he even claims that it's not a Canadian series. Please protect this page please, before it becomes worse.
Administrators' newsletter – September 2021
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.
- A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.
- A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
- A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.
Technical news
- The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.
Administrators' newsletter – October 2021
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, extended confirmed protection may be used preemptively on certain high-risk templates.
- Following a discussion at the Village Pump, there is consensus to treat discord logs the same as IRC logs. This means that discord logs will be oversighted if posted onwiki.
Technical news
- DiscussionTools has superseded Enterprisey's reply-link script. Editors may switch using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features.
Arbitration
- A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
- Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
- The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.
Miscellaneous
- Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
- The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
Boo!
editHello Samsara:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
—usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 22:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2021
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.
Technical news
- Toolhub is a catalogue of tools which can be used on Wikimedia wikis. It is at https://toolhub.wikimedia.org/.
Arbitration
- GeneralNotability, Mz7 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections. Ivanvector and John M Wolfson are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves to stand in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections from 07 November 2021 until 16 November 2021.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of five new CheckUsers and two new Oversighters.
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Administrators' newsletter – December 2021
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).
Administrator changes
Technical news
- Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
- The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections is open until 23:59, 06 December 2021 (UTC).
- The already authorized standard discretionary sanctions for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), broadly construed, have been made permanent.
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
editA recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2022
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.
- Additionally, consensus for proposal 6C of the 2021 RfA review has led to the creation of an administrative action review process. The purpose of this process will be to review individual administrator actions and individual actions taken by users holding advanced permissions.
Arbitration
- Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Cabayi, Donald Albury, Enterprisey, Izno, Opabinia regalis, Worm That Turned, Wugapodes.
Miscellaneous
- The functionaries email list (functionaries-en
lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
How we will see unregistered users
editHi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Iron Maiden site semi protection
editHi. I would like to submit Iron Maiden band page to semi - protection which may prevent the action by unregistered editors and editors with accounts that are not confirmed. Thanks!
Administrators' newsletter – February 2022
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- The Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines have been published for consideration. Voting to ratify this guideline is planned to take place 7 March to 21 March. Comments can be made on the talk page.
Technical news
- The user group
oversightwill be renamedsuppressin around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections. - The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.
- The user group
Arbitration
- Community input is requested on several motions aimed at addressing discretionary sanctions that are no longer needed or overly broad.
- The Arbitration Committee has published a generalised comment regarding successful appeals of sanctions that it can review (such as checkuser blocks).
- A motion related to the Antisemitism in Poland case was passed following a declined case request.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2022 Steward elections will begin on 07 February 2022, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2022, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey is open until 11 February 2022.
Nomination for deletion of Template:SCOTMcontributor
edit Template:SCOTMcontributor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2022
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A RfC is open to change the wording of revision deletion criterion 1 to remove the sentence relating to non-infringing contributions.
- A RfC is open to discuss prohibiting draftification of articles over 90 days old.
Technical news
- The deployment of the reply tool as an opt-out feature, as announced in last month's newsletter, has been delayed to 7 March. Feedback and comments are being welcomed at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project. (T296645)
- Special:Nuke will now allow the selection of standard deletion reasons to be used when mass-deleting pages. This was a Community Wishlist Survey request from 2022. (T25020)
- The ability to undelete the talk page when undeleting a page using Special:Undelete or the API will be added soon. This change was requested in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey. (T295389)
Arbitration
- Several unused discretionary sanctions and article probation remedies have been rescinded. This follows the community feedback from the 2021 Discretionary Sanctions review.
Miscellaneous
- The 2022 appointees for the Ombuds commission are Érico, Faendalimas, Galahad, Infinite0694, Mykola7, Olugold, Udehb and Zabe as regular members and Ameisenigel and JJMC89 as advisory members.
- Following the 2022 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AntiCompositeNumber, BRPever, Hasley, TheresNoTime, and Vermont.
- The 2022 Community Wishlist Survey results have been published alongside the ranking of prioritized proposals.
Unprotect anything about Israel and Palestine !
editAdministrators' newsletter – April 2022
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open proposing a change to the minimum activity requirements for administrators.
Technical news
- Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the
deletelogentryanddeletedhistoryrights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928) - When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)
Arbitration
- Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures § Opening of proceedings has been updated to reflect current practice following a motion.
- A arbitration case regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing has been closed.
- A arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been opened.
Miscellaneous
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines has closed, and the results were that 56.98% of voters supported the guidelines. The results of this vote mean the Wikimedia Foundation Board will now review the guidelines.
A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox album/genre/Sol-Angel and the Hadley St. Dreams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
It doesn't seem that something like this should exist as a subpage of the template:infobox album
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Solidest (talk) 14:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox album/genre/Sol-Angel and the Hadley St. Dreams
edit Template:Infobox album/genre/Sol-Angel and the Hadley St. Dreams has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Liz Read! Talk! 01:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
New administrator activity requirement
editThe administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2022
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, a change has been made to the administrators inactivity policy. Under the new policy, if an administrator has not made at least 100 edits over a period of 5 years they may be desysopped for inactivity.
- Following a discussion on the bureaucrat's noticeboard, a change has been made to the bureaucrats inactivity policy.
Technical news
- The ability to undelete the associated talk page when undeleting a page has been added. This was the 11th wish of the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey.
- A public status system for WMF wikis has been created. It is located at https://www.wikimediastatus.net/ and is hosted separately to WMF wikis so in the case of an outage it will remain viewable.
Arbitration
- Remedy 2 of the St Christopher case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to place a ban on single-purpose accounts who were disruptively editing on the article St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine or related pages from those pages.
Instincts
editPeek at !thank for my opinion on a deletionist you may remember. I do wish that the instincts of those who have been around awhile could be appreciated more here. But the legalists will have resort only to the rules as written. I fear that information and informing have become devalued here.
But do come back, so that other voices can be heard. Shenme (talk) 21:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
edit
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2022
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Several areas of improvement collated from community member votes have been identified in the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines. The areas of improvement have been sent back for review and you are invited to provide input on these areas.
Technical news
- Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
- The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.
Arbitration
- Remedy 2 of the Rachel Marsden case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to delete or reduce to a stub, together with their talk pages, articles related to Rachel Marsden when they violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.
- An arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been closed.
Your March 2021 revision of the PaintShop Pro page, which listed Jasc PSP version 9.02
editIn regards to Jasc Paint Shop Pro version 9.02, I can locate no record of such a version after reviewing both Jasc and Corel FTP server listings on both the Corel and archive.org websites. The last update and/or patch for version 9 on those servers is version 9.01. Did you have another source of information about an update to version 9.02? NZ Flag Maven (talk) 18:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Chimpanzee
editThe page for chimpanzee is protected against vandalism, but there’s no template added. Could you please fix it? The Will Smith Fish from Shark Take (talk) 21:10, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
edit
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:00, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
edit
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux Talk 13:06, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Ramle
editWhy have u locked Ramle page 46.32.121.179 (talk) 23:04, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Desktop Linux Summit for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desktop Linux Summit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
File:Picture sapanta gimp edit.jpg listed for discussion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Picture sapanta gimp edit.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Picture sapanta ps edit2.jpg listed for discussion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Picture sapanta ps edit2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:21, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Date of birth and death of Mary, mother of Jesus
editHello! I would like to remind you that the death of the Mother of God took place in the year 57 ("Lives of the Saints", Volume I, Tbilisi, 2001), when she was 72 years old (Epiphanius of Salamis, George Kedrenos, Andrew of Crete, simeon metafrastul). Appointed 14 years and 11 days (ყოვლადწმიდა ღვთისმშობლის დაწინდვა), Accordingly, 57-72=-15 (date of birth). According to Christian tradition, he was born on September 8 (21) and died on August 15 (28). I can change it with your permission. Lasha-george (talk) 16:14, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
The article Pentax K-S1 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails GNG. No reliable sources on google.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 21:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
The file File:Tuatara cladogram.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused, superseded by File:Tuatara cladogram.svg.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:11, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
The article HD Pentax-D FA 645 Macro 90mm F2.8 ED AW SR has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of notability, Wikipedia is not a product directory
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of GNOME Panel for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GNOME Panel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.― ☪ Kapudan Pasha (🧾 - 💬) 17:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Cultural depictions of dinosaurs
editCultural depictions of dinosaurs has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. PrimalMustelid (talk) 12:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Tamron AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD Aspherical IF for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamron AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD Aspherical IF, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamron AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD Aspherical IF until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
The article Tamron AF 18-250mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Per suggestion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamron AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD Aspherical IF
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
edit| Happy First Edit Day! Hi Samsara! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC) |
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LabPlot (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.