Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD) are fatal heart diseases that can cause death regardless of gender, age, race and ethnicity. The statistics shows that one person dies every 37 seconds in the United States from CVD. The heart attack, also known as myocardial infarction, is caused by a deficiency in myocardial perfusion or blood flow to cardiac muscle tissue.
In general, patients with suspicious heart disease symptoms undergo echocardiography first due to low cost, safety, and nonionizing radiation. However, echocardiography is limited by operator dependency, less field of view, technical artifact and low image quality. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR) is a non-invasive imaging modality which produces high quality images and perform safely. However, CMR requires a relatively long image acquisition time compared to Cardiac Computed Tomography (CCT). CCT provides high spatial and temporal resolution within relatively short time period. Retrospect data have proposed that the CCT provides accurately in left ventricle (LV) functional analysis, and characterizing the LV myocardium, which is complementary to echocardiography and CMR.
The mean difference in end-systolic radial strain between manual segmentation and CNN segmentation was 12.42%. The mean global circumferential strain differences in endocardium and epicardium were 0.34% and 0.04%, respectively. The mean global longitudinal strain difference in endocardium and epicardium were 0.06% and 0.07%, respectively.
The results summarize that the automated myocardium segmentation using CNN performs well in observing LV myocardial function. This could potentially assist finding the regional and global myocardial dysfunction and evaluating the myocardium diseases.