OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the performance of the iLet bionic pancreas (BP) in non-Hispanic White individuals (here referred to as Whites) and in Black, Hispanic, and other individuals (here collectively referred to as Minorities). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluated glycemic management with the BP versus standard of care (SC) in 161 adult and 165 pediatric participants with type 1 diabetes over 13 weeks. RESULTS: In Whites (n = 240), the mean baseline-adjusted difference in 13-week HbA1c between the BP and SC groups was -0.45% (95% CI -0.61 to -0.29 [-4.9 mmol/mol; -6.6 to -3.1]; P < 0.001), while this difference among Minorities (n = 84) was -0.53% (-0.83 to -0.24 [-6.0 mmol/mol; -9.2 to -2.8]; P < 0.001). In Whites, the mean baseline-adjusted difference in time in range between the BP and SC groups was 10% (95% CI 7-12; P < 0.001) and in Minorities was 14% (10-18; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The BP improves glycemic control in both Whites and Minorities and offers promise in decreasing health care disparities.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa's) are the standard treatment for children with central precocious puberty (CPP). We aim to present data on available GnRHa options with an easy-to-review table and discuss factors that influence treatment selection. Five GnRHa's are currently FDA-approved and prescribed in the US and published data suggest similar safety and efficacy profiles over the first year of treatment. One- and 3-month intramuscular (IM) leuprolide acetate (LA) have long-term safety and efficacy data and allow for flexible dosing. Six-month IM triptorelin pamoate offers a longer duration of treatment, but without long-term efficacy and outcome data. Six-month subcutaneous (SQ) LA combines a SQ route of injection and long duration of action but lacks long-term efficacy and outcome data. The 12-month SQ histrelin acetate implant avoids injections and offers the longest duration of action, but requires a minor surgical procedure with local or general anesthesia. Factors in treatment selection include route of administration, needle size, injection volume, duration of action, and cost. The current GnRHa landscape provides options with varying benefits and risks, allowing physicians and caregivers to select the most appropriate therapy based on the specific needs and concerns of the child and the caregiver. Agents have different advantages and disadvantages for use, with no one agent displaying superiority.

Context

Treatment options for central precocious puberty (CPP) are important for individualization of therapy.

Objective

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 6-month 45-mg leuprolide acetate (LA) depot with intramuscular administration.

Methods

LA depot was administered at weeks 0 and 24 to treatment-naïve (n = 27) or previously treated (n = 18) children with CPP in a phase 3, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study (NCT03695237). Week 24 peak-stimulated luteinizing hormone (LH) suppression (<4 mIU/mL) was the primary outcome. Secondary/other outcomes included basal sex hormone suppression (girls, estradiol <20 pg/mL; boys, testosterone <30 ng/dL), suppression of physical signs, height velocity, bone age, patient/parent-reported outcomes, and adverse events.

Results

All patients (age, 7.8 ± 1.27 years) received both scheduled study doses. At 24 weeks, 39/45 patients (86.7%) had LH suppressed. Six were counted as unsuppressed; 2 because of missing data, 3 with LH of 4.35-5.30 mIU/mL and 1 with LH of 21.07 mIU/mL. Through 48 weeks, LH, estradiol, and testosterone suppression was achieved in ≥86.7%, ≥97.4%, and 100%, respectively (as early as week 4 for LH and estradiol and week 12 for testosterone). Physical signs were suppressed at week 48 (girls, 90.2%; boys, 75.0%). Mean height velocity ranged 5.0 to 5.3 cm/year post-baseline in previously treated patients and declined from 10.1 to 6.5 cm/year at week 20 in treatment-naïve patients. Mean bone age advanced slower than chronological age. Patient/parent-reported outcomes remained stable. No new safety signals were identified. No adverse event led to treatment discontinuation.

Conclusion

Six-month intramuscular LA depot demonstrated 48-week efficacy with a safety profile consistent with other GnRH agonist formulations.

Turner syndrome, a congenital condition that affects ∼1/2,500 births, results from absence or structural alteration of the second sex chromosome. There has been substantial effort by numerous clinical and genetic research groups to delineate the clinical, pathophysiological, cytogenetic, and molecular features of this multisystem condition. Questions about the molecular-genetic and biological basis of many of the clinical features remain unanswered, and health care providers and families seek improved care for affected individuals. The inaugural "Turner Resource Network (TRN) Symposium" brought together individuals with Turner syndrome and their families, advocacy group leaders, clinicians, basic scientists, physician-scientists, trainees and other stakeholders with interest in the well-being of individuals and families living with the condition. The goal of this symposium was to establish a structure for a TRN that will be a patient-powered organization involving those living with Turner syndrome, their families, clinicians, and scientists. The TRN will identify basic and clinical questions that might be answered with registries, clinical trials, or through bench research to promote and advocate for best practices and improved care for individuals with Turner syndrome. The symposium concluded with the consensus that two rationales justify the creation of a TRN: inadequate attention has been paid to the health and psychosocial issues facing girls and women who live with Turner syndrome; investigations into the susceptibility to common disorders such as cardiovascular or autoimmune diseases caused by sex chromosome deficiencies will increase understanding of disease susceptibilities in the general population.

BACKGROUND: Currently available semiautomated insulin-delivery systems require individualized insulin regimens for the initialization of therapy and meal doses based on carbohydrate counting for routine operation. In contrast, the bionic pancreas is initialized only on the basis of body weight, makes all dose decisions and delivers insulin autonomously, and uses meal announcements without carbohydrate counting. METHODS: In this 13-week, multicenter, randomized trial, we randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio persons at least 6 years of age with type 1 diabetes either to receive bionic pancreas treatment with insulin aspart or insulin lispro or to receive standard care (defined as any insulin-delivery method with unblinded, real-time continuous glucose monitoring). The primary outcome was the glycated hemoglobin level at 13 weeks. The key secondary outcome was the percentage of time that the glucose level as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring was below 54 mg per deciliter; the prespecified noninferiority limit for this outcome was 1 percentage point. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 219 participants 6 to 79 years of age were assigned to the bionic-pancreas group, and 107 to the standard-care group. The glycated hemoglobin level decreased from 7.9% to 7.3% in the bionic-pancreas group and did not change (was at 7.7% at both time points) in the standard-care group (mean adjusted difference at 13 weeks, -0.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.6 to -0.3; P<0.001). The percentage of time that the glucose level as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring was below 54 mg per deciliter did not differ significantly between the two groups (13-week adjusted difference, 0.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.04; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The rate of severe hypoglycemia was 17.7 events per 100 participant-years in the bionic-pancreas group and 10.8 events per 100 participant-years in the standard-care group (P = 0.39). No episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In this 13-week, randomized trial involving adults and children with type 1 diabetes, use of a bionic pancreas was associated with a greater reduction than standard care in the glycated hemoglobin level. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04200313.).